Jump to content

Politics


Christmas Tree
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

I'm not disputing that he's anti-zionist. The pattern is clear there.

So he is anti-Jewish people believing they have a right to a homeland?

 

I really would like someone to clarify Corbyn's definition of Zionism.  And where is this 90% figure coming from?  It feels like the definition is a huge issue here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, no. I'm saying the opposite. Jewish people could have had a homeland without creating Israel, which was done in a way that was undeniably dismissive of the humanity and needs of the people already living there, presumably because they weren't white enough to be important.

 

Creating Israel was at best, unintentionally racist. This is not the same statement as 'Jewish people having a homeland is a racist endeavour'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

Um, no. I'm saying the opposite. Jewish people could have had a homeland without creating Israel, which was done in a way that was undeniably dismissive of the humanity and needs of the people already living there, presumably because they weren't white enough to be important.

 

Creating Israel was at best, unintentionally racist. This is not the same statement as 'Jewish people having a homeland is a racist endeavour'

 

 

So how was Israel created?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

Um, no. I'm saying the opposite. Jewish people could have had a homeland without creating Israel, which was done in a way that was undeniably dismissive of the humanity and needs of the people already living there, presumably because they weren't white enough to be important.

 

Creating Israel was at best, unintentionally racist. This is not the same statement as 'Jewish people having a homeland is a racist endeavour'

So you’re anti-Zionist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

Um, no. I'm saying the opposite. Jewish people could have had a homeland without creating Israel, which was done in a way that was undeniably dismissive of the humanity and needs of the people already living there, presumably because they weren't white enough to be important.

 

Creating Israel was at best, unintentionally racist. This is not the same statement as 'Jewish people having a homeland is a racist endeavour'

But now it exists and we have to deal with reality not an alternate history. As such do these people not have a right to live where they live, to go home, in spite of being against how their government opresses people? Because they can still be defined as Zionists.

 

And yes, I realise using the phrases 'go home' and 'these people' is not a good look but I can't be arsed changing it <_<   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, adios said:

But now it exists and we have to deal with reality not an alternate history. As such do these people not have a right to live where they live, to go home, in spite of being against how their government opresses people? Because they can still be defined as Zionists.

 

And yes, I realise using the phrases 'go home' and 'these people' is not a good look but I can't be arsed changing it <_<   

 

 

Absolutely they do. In my opinion. I've said previously on many occasions in the terrorist thread that the whole issue needs to be accepted for pragmatic reasons.

 

The point remains that taking a position against Zionism is not, looked at literally, racist. Islam contains within it a political ideology. Are we not allowed to criticise and reject that without being termed racists? It calls for the Islamation of all states. In effect, the Muslim 'homeland' would be the whole world.

 

Please note that i am not saying all or even most Muslims believe or want this. In fact i think less than half do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK so by @Rayvin's definition I am anti-Zionist and by @ewerk's I am a Zionist. Glad we've cleared that up. :razz:

 

But more importantly, Corbyn is claiming the former, so unless we have evidence he's lying, this incident does not make him a racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont even have an agenda in defending Corbyn anymore, i want him gone too - but this anti-semitism stuff is doing my fucking head in. I read an article in the Guardian the other day from someone who apparently backed Corbyn through every other anti-Semitism contention but drew the line at this one. Not the anti-Semitism definition, not Ken Livingstone, not the fucking mural, this statement. This statement was just beyond the pale, apparently.

 

FFS.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.