Jump to content

The Cricket Thread


McFaul
 Share

Do you like cricket?  

105 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

It was a poor score first innings score given the circumstances, despite it being over 400. Same with the last test. The collapses are a worry but they only happen because of not getting enough runs in the first innings. Too many players getting out to daft shots instead of really grafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you on the collapsing and 477 was slightly under par on that surface but it still should have been more than enough runs for us to at least get a draw. No test side in India has posted a score that high in the first innings and gone into lose a game before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think it's time for Cook to go as captain now.  We have some quality players but there doesn't seem to be enough fight in the team when things go against them.  Maybe changing the captain will help address that.  This was always going to be a very big challenge but the last two tests have been pretty pathetic on the whole (while still having some good individual performances).  I don't think that there's much in the line up that needs to change apart from having everyone fit (Wood would be a good addition if he could stay fit but I suspect he'll always be a bit injury prone) so beyond that it's either the captain or coach you need to look at.  Bayliss and Farbrace have done an excellent job with the white ball teams and I wonder if having Morgan (and Butler) captain those teams has also had a more positive influence than what Cook is having with the test team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree DK. Losing by an innings after scoring the best part of 500 runs is pathetic. Something's got to change. you're only going to win games when your bowlers take 20 wickets and our spinners haven't been as good as we hoped they would plus our fielding has been sloppy. But the manner in which we continue to throw wickets away and collapse when things aren't going our way has to be looked at - it isn't a coincidence that this keeps happening. Perhaps are more aggressive, proactive skipper would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you on the collapsing and 477 was slightly under par on that surface but it still should have been more than enough runs for us to at least get a draw. No test side in India has posted a score that high in the first innings and gone into lose a game before.

Was a bit more than slightly below par. Just look at how easy India found it and also look at the way in which Rashid and Dawson batted. I.e. batting time and working hard for the right to play your shots. I take your point they should've batted out for a draw but you already know that because I said that yesterday. Anyway, we're just repeating ourselves but not enough batsmen get the big hundreds once they're in or convert 40s/50s/60s into tons. Also, batting records have come tumbling in recent years and will continue to do so. Historical precedent has a relevance but not in the way it once did. In any case, if you're going to argue England's 477 was a good score surely the fact that India got the biggest score ever against England (and declared) puts it into context. Especially with England batting first. India are class but do they really have loads more batting talent than that England side? I don't think so. Obviously they have better spinners but still...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think it's time for Cook to go as captain now.  We have some quality players but there doesn't seem to be enough fight in the team when things go against them.  Maybe changing the captain will help address that.  This was always going to be a very big challenge but the last two tests have been pretty pathetic on the whole (while still having some good individual performances).  I don't think that there's much in the line up that needs to change apart from having everyone fit (Wood would be a good addition if he could stay fit but I suspect he'll always be a bit injury prone) so beyond that it's either the captain or coach you need to look at.  Bayliss and Farbrace have done an excellent job with the white ball teams and I wonder if having Morgan (and Butler) captain those teams has also had a more positive influence than what Cook is having with the test team.

Cook's gone as captain like. Probably good for him and the team going forward. I wouldn't throw the baby out with the bath water though as he's still a class player and Bayliss and Farbrace have had, on the whole, a very positive impact on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was a bit more than slightly below par. Just look at how easy India found it and also look at the way in which Rashid and Dawson batted. I.e. batting time and working hard for the right to play your shots. I take your point they should've batted out for a draw but you already know that because I said that yesterday. Anyway, we're just repeating ourselves but not enough batsmen get the big hundreds once they're in or convert 40s/50s/60s into tons. Also, batting records have come tumbling in recent years and will continue to do so. Historical precedent has a relevance but not in the way it once did. In any case, if you're going to argue England's 477 was a good score surely the fact that India got the biggest score ever against England (and declared) puts it into context. Especially with England batting first. India are class but do they really have loads more batting talent than that England side? I don't think so. Obviously they have better spinners but still...

I'm not sure why we're arguing as I'm pretty sure we agree. England should have at the very least have saved both games after batting first the past two tests. We failed to win from dominant positions because our spinners haven't been good enough and because while plenty of players made runs, none went on to score a daddy hundred. Potential draws were turned into defeats by our inability to stem final innings collapses. Again. Getting as boring as it is predictable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why we're arguing as I'm pretty sure we agree. England should have at the very least have saved both games after batting first the past two tests. We failed to win from dominant positions because our spinners haven't been good enough and because while plenty of players made runs, none went on to score a daddy hundred. Potential draws were turned into defeats by our inability to stem final innings collapses. Again. Getting as boring as it is predictable

Yeah, I think we largely agree and it was a combination of those things obviously. My point, which I probably didn't make very well was that you probably wanted at least another 150 in the first innings of the 4th test and a similar sort of score (i.e. 550-ish*) in the last one. That puts more pressure on India because it's almost impossible for them to win (although I have little doubt they'd have managed draws) and it removes the pressure of having to bat when all you can possibly do is a save the match at best in the 2nd innings.

*edit: And that side / batting line up should've been more than capable of making that sort of score.

Edited by Alex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent level headed assessment of England's situation. The line up he's picked for Australia does look exciting though perhaps a little harsh on Moeen. I agree he should be in the side as a batsman and occasional spin bowler rather than frontline spinner so it probably does come down to a choice between him and Buttler.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2016/dec/20/england-india-test-series-alastair-cook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like the idea of buttler in tests. he's still got a bit to go to prove he can do it in the long form, but if he can adapt his one day game he has the potential to be the most destructive wickie/bastman in the world. 

 

i think bairstow has shown in the past year that he is good enough after a sticky start and more than good enough to bat at 5 as a specialist batsman. whether that's what transpires remains to be seen, but root/bairstow/stokes/buttler is an exciting middle order. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely harsh on Ali, especially as he's just got four hundreds in the last year. But it's plain for everyone to see that he's not a frontline bowler. It remains to be seen whether Rashid is the answer there though. Ali's struggles against the short ball are likely to be tested against Australia too.

That batting lineup certainly looks exciting though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morgan hit a last ball 6 for 70no this morning for the Thunder in his last game in the big bash before he heads out to India.  Hopefully him Willey and Billings can take on their form from Australia where they've all been excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.