Dr Gloom 24832 Posted yesterday at 07:19 Share Posted yesterday at 07:19 (edited) 40 minutes ago, ewerk said: It makes zero difference to PSR how the payments are structured. why structure it that way then? Is it not about bumping payments into the following financial year or something so there’s more headroom this window? Edited yesterday at 07:25 by Dr Gloom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 24832 Posted yesterday at 07:20 Share Posted yesterday at 07:20 Genuine question. This isn’t the week I’m finally getting the hang of this accountancy lark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 24832 Posted yesterday at 07:26 Share Posted yesterday at 07:26 (edited) Amortisation wankers Edited yesterday at 07:27 by Dr Gloom 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53986 Posted yesterday at 07:27 Share Posted yesterday at 07:27 6 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: Genuine question. This isn’t the week I’m finally getting the hang of this accountancy lark If we buy him for £50m on a 5 year contract, the PSR effect is £10m per year. We could structure the payments as £1 today and the rest 5 years today, but it wouldn't matter because amortisation is done on a straight line basis. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 35104 Posted yesterday at 07:37 Share Posted yesterday at 07:37 15 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: Genuine question. This isn’t the week I’m finally getting the hang of this accountancy lark Most likely because of cash flow rather than PSR. Though given the Saudis aren’t short of a pound or two I don’t know why we aren’t offering clubs money up front in order to gain an advantage. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 24832 Posted yesterday at 07:43 Share Posted yesterday at 07:43 2 minutes ago, ewerk said: Most likely because of cash flow rather than PSR. Though given the Saudis aren’t short of a pound or two I don’t know why we aren’t offering clubs money up front in order to gain an advantage. isn’t that connected to PSR/APT though? The Saudis aren’t allowed to just pump their billions into the club either through the ownership or related parties so delaying the payments means we have more cash to spend this window? Forgive my rudimentary understanding of all this. I fucking hate this craic tbh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53986 Posted yesterday at 07:48 Share Posted yesterday at 07:48 Aye we need to operate as a standalone business, so managing cash flow is important. If we're getting cash injections from the Saudis, I guess they would have to be treated as loans, which now attract interest for PSR following the latest rule changes. They could inject cash as equity but I assume that would dilute the other shareholders. Also, we struggle to move quickly on transfers anyway, the last thing we want is to layer this on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 15540 Posted yesterday at 10:23 Share Posted yesterday at 10:23 As was mentioned on here the other day, the stadium is going to be massive from a commercial POV. A huge outlay but, if you do it right, it’ll be making money every day. Which makes the constant delays in the announcement even more frustrating 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duffman 11 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Will Elanga help us against all the teams playing with a low block against us? Think I’d rather see if Eddie is capable of turning Sancho back to his dortmund best. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 35104 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Duffman said: Think I’d rather see if Eddie is capable of turning Sancho back to his dortmund best. I can think of 300,000 reasons a week as to why that’s a bad idea. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaser 1512 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Duffman said: Will Elanga help us against all the teams playing with a low block against us? Think I’d rather see if Eddie is capable of turning Sancho back to his dortmund best. If a team is willing to pay £5m not to sign him, then we stay clear. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 13254 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Chaser said: If a team is willing to pay £5m not to sign him, then we stay clear. If Chelsea knock back a winger, when they have signed all the wingers then it’s probs not worth looking at it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 20291 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago We sign Harvey Elliot for the job description as outlined above ^ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 15540 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Elliott can’t finish 90 minutes and is only being talked about because he scored a couple of goals against some kids. No thanks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 24832 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Elliot looks a good technical player to me. Srill very young and I imagine Howe could massively improve him too. I think he’d be a good buy if one of willock or Sean leave plus he can cover loads of postions 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53986 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 24595 Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago https://football-italia.net/newcastle-united-step-in-for-thiaw-after-como/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 24595 Posted 39 minutes ago Share Posted 39 minutes ago Are we still close to agreeing Trafford yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 11342 Posted 34 minutes ago Share Posted 34 minutes ago no. nor any cunt else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBass 3283 Posted 20 minutes ago Share Posted 20 minutes ago 13 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said: no. nor any cunt else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now