Ugly Mackems 133 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Shows no gratitude at all towards those who risked their own safety to sucure his own safety. The two Canadians rescued with him are totally not interested in helping the rescuers with details of their ordeal that could give information that may lead to the capture of the hostage takers. Cunts! Send them back to almost certain death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 well its not often I jump in to agree but yeah, if they're not willing to give over all the information they have then its like shitting on the grave of the American that was killed and helping to sign a death sentence for the next poor sods that are grabbed by this gang. Frankly, its proof that special forces etc shouldnt waste their time trying to get silly old goats such as this out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Deserves the bread knife treatment i reckon. Fucking disgraceful behaviour imo. Bet the rescuers wish they had put a bullet in his head now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 from the Beeb "Head of the British Army, Gen Sir Mike Jackson, said he was "saddened" there did not seem to be any gratitude. Christian Peacemaker Teams, the group all three men were campaigning for, insisted it had thanked the soldiers. And Pat Kember, the campaigner's wife, said: "I am overjoyed that Norman is free to come home and I am very grateful for all those who have helped secure his release." " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6082 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 hes a loon! theyl be trying to keep him off the telly cos hel just go into a rant ala kanye stylee about how the military occupation of Iraq is unjust and hed rather hed been left there than been the subject of military intervention. whats the sad old cunt doing fucking off abroad and leaving his family at home for anyway. surely they should be his first concern. needs to sort his priorities tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I'm just going for a, boiling, piss. Ungrateful old twat. Sickening, vomit inducing self interested arsehole. Wanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 i was under the impression that he hadnt been rescued as such. it was more like the special force unit came across him as he'd been abandoned by his captors. i may be wrong....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6082 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 the 'official' story is that they launched an attack to free him but his captors had already fled. however, that may be spin doctor talk for 'found him by accident'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 the 'official' story is that they launched an attack to free him but his captors had already fled. however, that may be spin doctor talk for 'found him by accident'. 110464[/snapback] exactamundo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Seem to be plenty of conflicting stories and quotes, but if he's really not said thanks to the soldiers who saved him then he's a fucking moron. He's stupid enough to go over there anyway, no wonder he got kidnapped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WubbleUC 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 (edited) Apparently he's planning on going back. Well then, if the deluded auld git thinks Iraqis are just going to fall at his feet and welcome him with open arms, just bacause he doesn't agree with the war, he's stupider than I thought. I cannot beleive that ungreatful old bastard hasn't thanked his rescuers. Weather it was a mistake or not, I'd definitely be thanking them if it was me, having seen the quite simply horrible way previous captors have been killed. He obviosuly wouldn't have minded getting pumped full of lead at close range, or getting his head brutally sawn off while they captured it on tape then.. Edited March 25, 2006 by WubbleUC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4002 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 FFS he hasn't made any statement yet. His organisation did say thanks so the general or whoever was talking shite. Since when has anything generals said been 100% truth? Daily Mail journalism at its best (I saw it in the Standard which is the same thing). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 FFS he hasn't made any statement yet. His organisation did say thanks so the general or whoever was talking shite. Since when has anything generals said been 100% truth? Daily Mail journalism at its best (I saw it in the Standard which is the same thing). 110478[/snapback] you're as deluded and as naive as him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Saying he thanked them here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4844800.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4002 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 (edited) FFS he hasn't made any statement yet. His organisation did say thanks so the general or whoever was talking shite. Since when has anything generals said been 100% truth? Daily Mail journalism at its best (I saw it in the Standard which is the same thing). 110478[/snapback] you're as deluded and as naive as him 110480[/snapback] Thee was a statement of thanks on their website yesterday before the general spoke. He has not spoken to a journalist yet. I agree he's an idiot for going there but this "thanks" story is utter shite. I'm sorry it doesn't fit your worldview but thats the truth. Edit: now he has spoken and surprise surprise thanked them whilst making his point. Edited March 25, 2006 by NJS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 No 10 getting in a First Strike in case he sounds off about the War I guess......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 FFS he hasn't made any statement yet. His organisation did say thanks so the general or whoever was talking shite. Since when has anything generals said been 100% truth? Daily Mail journalism at its best (I saw it in the Standard which is the same thing). 110478[/snapback] you're as deluded and as naive as him 110480[/snapback] Thee was a statement of thanks on their website yesterday before the general spoke. He has not spoken to a journalist yet. I agree he's an idiot for going there but this "thanks" story is utter shite. I'm sorry it doesn't fit your worldview but thats the truth. Edit: now he has spoken and surprise surprise thanked them whilst making his point. 110484[/snapback] apparently he didn't say thanks to anyone, he's only made a public statement after being vilified for it. I can't see why the people who said he didn't thank them would say he didn't if he had ! These people don't seek publicity, so they must be pretty pissed off. If he goes back again he's just taking the piss IMO [or fantastically stupid] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordiesned 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 He has said thankyou! He was on the news earlier reading a prepared statement in which he paid courage to those who had recued him. Freed Kember thanks rescue troops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordiesned 0 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 FFS he hasn't made any statement yet. His organisation did say thanks so the general or whoever was talking shite. Since when has anything generals said been 100% truth? Daily Mail journalism at its best (I saw it in the Standard which is the same thing). 110478[/snapback] you're as deluded and as naive as him 110480[/snapback] Thee was a statement of thanks on their website yesterday before the general spoke. He has not spoken to a journalist yet. I agree he's an idiot for going there but this "thanks" story is utter shite. I'm sorry it doesn't fit your worldview but thats the truth. Edit: now he has spoken and surprise surprise thanked them whilst making his point. 110484[/snapback] apparently he didn't say thanks to anyone, he's only made a public statement after being vilified for it. I can't see why the people who said he didn't thank them would say he didn't if he had ! These people don't seek publicity, so they must be pretty pissed off. If he goes back again he's just taking the piss IMO [or fantastically stupid] 110512[/snapback] He's only made a public statement now because he's only just got home! I liked Jimmy Carr's line on 9 out of 10 cats last night mind: "If he'd wanted to be beaten and chained to a radiator he'd have got a home help in." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 The naive ones are the people who accept the shite in the likes of the Mail as gospel tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 Whole story nothing but the usual spin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 He's nee Terry Waite like tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smooth Operator 10 Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 Hostage syndrome tbh, he's obviously fallen in love with his captors and who can blame him, he's 70 odd, it's his last chance of a meaningfull relationship. He obviously wasn't happy in his marriage or he wouldn't have fucked off to work in a war zone would he. He's been removed from his loved one's by burly blokes in balaclavas! Tantermount to kidnapping tbh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 (edited) TBH I wouldn't send ANYONE to save someone who volunteers to go and risk their lives in downtown Baghdad It's their choice after all Mrs T's "robust" reaction to IRA hunger strikers soon saw that off as a tactic Edited March 27, 2006 by Rob W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Kirkey 0 Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 What did he expect would happen, misguided cretin. Nice to see (I counted, might well have been more) three coppers outside his house dealing with the media 'scrum' yesterday too. God forbid they'd actually do some proper police work, waste of manpower having them there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now