Leazes?

[Ted Maul 0]

You think the anti-Shepherd brigade beat him to death in the town last night or is he just avoiding this forum like the plague?

[Renton 17793]

Look, he's a busy man. If you've got something to say to him, pm him or take it to the howaythetoon forum.

[Gemmill 34503]

I'd like to think that even Shepherd's staunchest supporter would look at the current situation and have to conced that Shepherd is in the firing line with good reason. Having said that, Leazes has surprised me before in how far he'll go to defend Shepherd.

 

Just seen the footage of the protest on Goals on Sunday there. I'm gutted that the next home game is so far away. I would bet good money that Shepherd won't be there for it though.

[Baggio 0]

He's on N-O defending the amount of money Shepherd takes out in dividends.

[sammynb 2929]

He's on N-O defending the amount of money Shepherd takes out in dividends.

Has anyone ever actually checked if his IP address is out of SJP?

Edited November 5, 2006 by sammynb

[Toonpack 6866]

Leazes steps in from the cold SHOCK HORROR possibly?????

 

you have got to say - again - that like all boards, too many bad appointments and they are finished themselves and their time is getting closer.

Edited November 5, 2006 by Toonpack

[Renton 17793]

There's a letter in the Sunday Sun today that just has to have been written by Leazes. He even uses the expression "rose tinted spectacles".

 

Only thing is its by a guy called Rich Oliver of Cramlington . Maybe he we was moved out of the west end during the slum clearances?

[BlueStar 0]

Leazes steps in from the cold SHOCK HORROR possibly?????

 

you have got to say - again - that like all boards, too many bad appointments and they are finished themselves and their time is getting closer.

 

And HTL has said that if Roeder turns out not to be a good appointment, Freddy should go. Dark days for the Fat One indeed.

Edited November 5, 2006 by BlueStar

[peasepud 59]

Leazes steps in from the cold SHOCK HORROR possibly?????

 

you have got to say - again - that like all boards, too many bad appointments and they are finished themselves and their time is getting closer.

 

And HTL has said that if Roeder turns out not to be a good appointment, Freddy should go. Dark days for the Fat One indeed.

 

Shepherd must be shitting bricks now like.

[Rob W 0]

He's on N-O defending the amount of money Shepherd takes out in dividends.

Has anyone ever actually checked if his IP address is out of SJP?

 

 

Its actually Gibralter - he's Dougies love child

[Rob W 0]

There's a letter in the Sunday Sun today that just has to have been written by Leazes. He even uses the expression "rose tinted spectacles".

 

Only thing is its by a guy called Rich Oliver of Cramlington . Maybe he we was moved out of the west end during the slum clearances?

 

 

and move away from all them lovely immigrants he loves so much?

 

for shame, for shame

[luckyluke 1]

I think he's realised that Freddy is not the answer, gone insane and has been sectioned.

[BlueStar 0]

Surprised no-one's nit picked "Where for art thou?" being used to mean "Where are you" yet tbh.

[Toonpack 6866]

Leazes steps in from the cold SHOCK HORROR possibly?????

 

you have got to say - again - that like all boards, too many bad appointments and they are finished themselves and their time is getting closer.

 

AND when I asked if he'd finally seen the light he said

 

I've always said this

 

Unfuckingbelievable

[Mark 0]

Leazes steps in from the cold SHOCK HORROR possibly?????

 

you have got to say - again - that like all boards, too many bad appointments and they are finished themselves and their time is getting closer.

 

AND when I asked if he'd finally seen the light he said

 

I've always said this

 

Unfuckingbelievable

 

 

Will be a different one, man.

[snakehips 0]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

Edited November 5, 2006 by snakehips

[Toonpack 6866]

Leazes steps in from the cold SHOCK HORROR possibly?????

 

you have got to say - again - that like all boards, too many bad appointments and they are finished themselves and their time is getting closer.

 

AND when I asked if he'd finally seen the light he said

 

I've always said this

 

Unfuckingbelievable

 

 

Will be a different one, man.

 

Nope it's exactly the same Leazes, the one and only

[LeazesMag 0]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597264

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg583197

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg535150

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...mp;#entry204865

 

Might be painful for some of you to be wrong, but ref judgements on Kluivert, Souness, Luque, Boumsong, Ameobi, Bellamy, Zoggy ..... I'm always right.

[Ted Maul 0]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597264

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg583197

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg535150

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...mp;#entry204865

 

Might be painful for some of you to be wrong, but ref judgements on Kluivert, Souness, Luque, Boumsong, Ameobi, Bellamy, Zoggy ..... I'm always right.

 

Haven't you denied being NE5 in the past?

[snakehips 0]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597264

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg583197

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg535150

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...mp;#entry204865

 

Might be painful for some of you to be wrong, but ref judgements on Kluivert, Souness, Luque, Boumsong, Ameobi, Bellamy, Zoggy ..... I'm always right.

 

Ah, thanks Leazes - not having continuous tinternet acccess means I haven't seen half of that lot. Some of it makes interesting reading, though.

 

For example:

 

"I am not saying they were planned. I am saying that in the real world, you have to make short term buys sometimes"

 

and

 

"The biggest mistake and the most short sighted policy of all is to buy average players who you will need to replace in a year or two"

 

Indeed, Leazes, you are always right. Especially if you cover all bases like the two quotes above.

 

I make mistakes, Lord knows I do. I am living with my emotions from yesterday, not one week ago, not two months ago and certainly not pre-Keegan - something you enjoy referring to.

 

My emotions following yesterday's debacle tell me we are in deep shit and if it is only you and I that can see we are in need of a striker who can score goals, we are in reallly deep as it is fucking obvious to me that that is our most pressing requirement.

 

Yesterday was my first game of the season, so you will have been able to formulate your thoughts over a longer period than I, but yesterday was a frightening sight for me, I have to say; Truly frightening.

[manc-mag 1]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597264

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg583197

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg535150

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...mp;#entry204865

 

Might be painful for some of you to be wrong, but ref judgements on Kluivert, Souness, Luque, Boumsong, Ameobi, Bellamy, Zoggy ..... I'm always right.

 

I don't think theres a massive amount of disagreement over individual players generally on here tbh-where theres been divergence, it's largely been over how much time they should be given to make the grade and how long we can tolerate poor performances from x, y or z. I don't think you've displayed any clairvoyant qualities re managers either-everyone's been depressed to fuck with the Souness and Roeder appointments.

 

No, I think TM's referring to the Shepherd situation, where it seems to be you against the entire right minded footballing public.

[LeazesMag 0]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597264

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg583197

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg535150

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...mp;#entry204865

 

Might be painful for some of you to be wrong, but ref judgements on Kluivert, Souness, Luque, Boumsong, Ameobi, Bellamy, Zoggy ..... I'm always right.

 

Ah, thanks Leazes - not having continuous tinternet acccess means I haven't seen half of that lot. Some of it makes interesting reading, though.

 

For example:

 

"I am not saying they were planned. I am saying that in the real world, you have to make short term buys sometimes"

 

and

 

"The biggest mistake and the most short sighted policy of all is to buy average players who you will need to replace in a year or two"

 

Indeed, Leazes, you are always right. Especially if you cover all bases like the two quotes above.

 

I make mistakes, Lord knows I do. I am living with my emotions from yesterday, not one week ago, not two months ago and certainly not pre-Keegan - something you enjoy referring to.

 

My emotions following yesterday's debacle tell me we are in deep shit and if it is only you and I that can see we are in need of a striker who can score goals, we are in reallly deep as it is fucking obvious to me that that is our most pressing requirement.

 

Yesterday was my first game of the season, so you will have been able to formulate your thoughts over a longer period than I, but yesterday was a frightening sight for me, I have to say; Truly frightening.

 

its not aimed specifically at you, you are one of the realistic and sensible ones on here, its a response thats all, the same as the quotes you highlight. The point is that any realistic person accepts people make mistakes, but only true idiots will blame the chairman of the football club for spending money on a player, then blame him when the club doesn't spend money on a player. For instance. I am not happy buying short term stop gap players, but accept that the situation calls for it. However there are people who criticise it and say we should be buying more big proven players, then turn around and say the club should not be spending money they don't have and/or complaining about the finance report last week.

 

I think it is frighteningly obvious we have needed at least one striker, and has been for a while, and I equally share your view that it is frightening that people [people ? or idiots ?] actually think we needed defenders more, and still do in some cases, despite the attempt to put the situation in front of them in the best way I could.

[LeazesMag 0]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597264

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg583197

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg535150

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...mp;#entry204865

 

Might be painful for some of you to be wrong, but ref judgements on Kluivert, Souness, Luque, Boumsong, Ameobi, Bellamy, Zoggy ..... I'm always right.

 

I don't think theres a massive amount of disagreement over individual players generally on here tbh-where theres been divergence, it's largely been over how much time they should be given to make the grade and how long we can tolerate poor performances from x, y or z. I don't think you've displayed any clairvoyant qualities re managers either-everyone's been depressed to fuck with the Souness and Roeder appointments.

 

No, I think TM's referring to the Shepherd situation, where it seems to be you against the entire right minded footballing public.

 

The Shepherd situation is a different situation to the pressing need for a forward and an attacking midfield player of the type mentioned. I don't think judging players is a clairvoyant quality, sometimes it is easy and obvious, so long as you don't wear rose tinted glasses and are honest, and accept what is requred to be successful in the premiership, then its basis stuff.

 

No, Shepherd like all chairman will go if the club continues to disappoint. That is football. The point i have made from day 1 is don't automatically expect better. There are plenty around who are a lot worse, and we have had them ourselves so we are not immune to it. Time will tell. We might get lucky or we might suffer an absolute disaster. Some people obviously don't understand this, although the mackems just down the road stare them in the face as a classic example - but having a board who is ambitious and backs their managers gives you a chance, having one that is mediocre and afraid to do this gives you no chance of ever succeeding. If this happens, or we get someone who does not have any interest in the club, it WILL be an absolute disaster, if you can't see this then there is nothing else I can say other than you - not you - are extremely naive.

Edited November 6, 2006 by LeazesMag

[Renton 17793]

Below is a quote from leazes on N-O. Now he has either been reading my posts today, or he is not as stupid as he looks Virtually the exact same thing I am saying. Me and Leazes, like that: *holds up crossed fingers*

 

 

"Despite buying new forwards, we still need more because they are either not playing or aren't what we want or aren't good enough. That is obvious. We don't need defenders anything like we need forwards.

 

Up front we need someone to make things happen, ie like Shearer did. We need someone who will put pressure on defenders, whether by strength, pace or both, we need to give them something to do and something to stop. We are still putting in crosses, and hitting the ball down the field but there is no one there to either muscle for the ball or get their first and enable the team to push out."

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597264

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg597227

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg583197

 

http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/....html#msg535150

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...mp;#entry204865

 

Might be painful for some of you to be wrong, but ref judgements on Kluivert, Souness, Luque, Boumsong, Ameobi, Bellamy, Zoggy ..... I'm always right.

 

I've been sad enough to follow those links and even sadder I've already read them. What do you think they prove exactly? Fuck all as far as I can tell.

 

The bit I've bolded just sums you up, you are such an arrogant arse it's unbelievable. But just for the record, you have recently agreed Roeder was a good choice of manager, at least you had no problems with his canditure and success at getting the job. You also thought O'Neill was no better than Souness. But worst of all of course is your unremitting support of Shepherd no matter what happens. It's truly pathetic Leazes, while he is sunning himself in his Majorcan villa [shudder] paid for by "mugs" like us he will be pleased as punch there are still morons like you who will stand up for him no matter what happens to the club.

 

Dinosaurs like you are dying out, but unfortunately I fear it is too late now no matter what happens to Shepherd, it really looks like his gross incompetence have fucked the club up Risdale style. So Leazes, if we are relegated, do you agree Shepherd will have left the club in it's worst financial position in its history? I'll give you a clue, the answer is yes.

[sammynb 2929]

The Shepherd situation is a different situation to the pressing need for a forward and an attacking midfield player of the type mentioned. I don't think judging players is a clairvoyant quality, sometimes it is easy and obvious, so long as you don't wear rose tinted glasses and are honest, and accept what is requred to be successful in the premiership, then its basis stuff.

 

No, Shepherd like all chairman will go if the club continues to disappoint. That is football. The point i have made from day 1 is don't automatically expect better. There are plenty around who are a lot worse, and we have had them ourselves so we are not immune to it. Time will tell. We might get lucky or we might suffer an absolute disaster. Some people obviously don't understand this, although the mackems just down the road stare them in the face as a classic example - but having a board who is ambitious and backs their managers gives you a chance, having one that is mediocre and afraid to do this gives you no chance of ever succeeding. If this happens, or we get someone who does not have any interest in the club, it WILL be an absolute disaster, if you can't see this then there is nothing else I can say other than you - not you - are extremely naive.

Leaze, sorry mate, I for one have agreed with you on many things, not the least the whole Souness/Bellamy shite but I don't think you can use the arguement in bold any longer.

It is obvious to all that Shepherd is picking and choosing who Newcastle sign, not the manager (the rumours of other managers turning us down for this very reason are to many and often).

And you have to agree that is untenable for a manager, any manager to build a team from players someone else is telling you you are having.

Edited November 6, 2006 by sammynb