jaythesouthernmag

Maybe he should have sent it to the mackems

LM if you go to so many games why do you not post in the match threads when we have been doing so well??

Listening to all the people who spoke to him on Saturday makes it even more baffling as to why, there has to be something very serious, too big for him to face. I hope if It's bad then for the sake of his family it never comes out. If it turns out a tabloid has been hounding him then they should be shut down, I deteste our gutter press anyway

Made me well up a bit, imagine talking about a mate you've known for 20 years on live tv knowing there's a chance you were the last person to hear from him. Don't think sky should re-run that tbh

Just had sky's Brynn Law outside Ellend Rd, they were good mates and exchanged texts on Saturday afternoon, he then said he txt him Sunday morning to say give him a call as sick rumour going round, no call then he broke down. Very sad to see

Glad he's playing as his legs have gone and he's nowhere near the player he was, my Chelsea supporting mates words not mine. Also hope Colo's shitter,error prone look-a-likee plays too I think we will turn em over

Signing a couple of old Man Utd rejects as your main defenders, letting your best strikers go and replacing them with an unproven teenager and a cock end like Bendtner is a recipe for disaster, fucking funny tho

Robert >>>>>>>>>>>>>Jonas Couldn't give a shit if Jonas does work hard, Robert was the best winger since Ginola and wasn't far from being as good as David. I'd take the Robert of his first season here o ver Ginola in his first season here, so much more productive but he let himself down near the of his time here. Loved Robert, some thunderbolts,knocking Bernard over with that free kick and playing that game with what looked like a puffer jacket under his shirt

RIP great player for us a proper 100%er.

Big critic last season, fucking world class this season, he's a superstar keeper. I reckon he's won us a fair share of games so far, an integral part of our defence. How unlucky is Harps to run into Timmy after Shay

Great result especially with Chiek missing, not shaping up to badly for a team with no ambition that sells its best players and replaces them with second rate ones Maybe some doubters may now start to believe we are a good side

answer the question man Why don't you answer my questions?? Would YOU consider Europe a success THIS season? Which clubs, in your opinion, should we be competing with and for what league position?? Simple really??? for the last time, I see the long term not the short term. I don't consider a flash in the pan in terms of league positions to be a "success", and long term success WILL NOT happen while the club sells its best players and pockets the cash. Get it ? Why is 7th success for one person and 5th is failure for another ? 7th will never be success for me, but Manchester United and Arsenal whether we like it or not will always be a bigger club than we are, Liverpool are massively bankrolled while, Man City and Chelsea were behind us before Abramovic and the Arabs, while Tottenham are the role model for us they've over taken us. The dynamics of the Premiership are totally different to what they were in 2003. So from being the third or fourth club in the pecking order in 2003, Chelsea and Man City have wiped us out the water and Tottenham are a London club on the up. With the external investment in Man City, Chelsea and Liverpool, and the sheer size of Arsenal and Man Utd, even if we had the set we had on paper in 2003, then we'd be vying for the slot of sixth biggest club with Tottenham in their present form at best. Spot on there

answer the question man Why don't you answer my questions?? Would YOU consider Europe a success THIS season? Which clubs, in your opinion, should we be competing with and for what league position?? Simple really??? for the last time, I see the long term not the short term. I don't consider a flash in the pan in terms of league positions to be a "success", and long term success WILL NOT happen while the club sells its best players and pockets the cash. Get it ? Why is 7th success for one person and 5th is failure for another ? As its relative to where we and other teams are NOW, in the PRESENT, 2011 Get it?? Still didnt answer any questions there grey man

answer the question man Why don't you answer my questions?? Would YOU consider Europe a success THIS season? Which clubs, in your opinion, should we be competing with and for what league position?? Simple really???

I'm only replying to posters like manc mag. If I don't reply, posters like Fish and JAysouthernmag ask me why I haven't responded ? In fact, I've asked mancmag the same question twice today....... Correction, you don't answer posts where you can't use your stock responses. Fuck, you won't even answer if you think getting into the Europa league this season will constitute success but getting into the Europa League - and even finishing 5th in the premiership - was booed and regarded as failure not so long ago. I'm not quite sure of the difference, can you explain ? I believe Alex and HF have also pointed this out, so apologies if you have explained already to them and I missed it. Can't even answer a simple question without mentioning what happend previously. There has been a lot of water under the bridge since then. We are talking about the present. Would you not consider a European place THIS season would be a success? I never said European football under the previous owners was a failure, just for the record As I said, I'm looking for the football club to set itself up and show ambition for the long term, not a flash in the pan run of games after selling its best players and pocketing the cash, which is short term. Please explain why 7th is success for Mike Ashley and failure for others ? Still no answer to the question then and the usual drivel too I will leave it there then and let other posters judge you by those responses you can judge me by how well the team do in the long term, however 4 years have passed and to date, Mike Ashley has got nowhere near his predecessors, despite adopting "better" policies. I rest my case look at the league tables in a few years time chum. LOL And for you to refer to another poster as a grey man when you can't give answers to simple questions is pretty laughable really

Talking to my Liverpool supporting mates at work last night, all but one reckon he's poor and the one that didn't said he needs to adapt his game. I don't think he can and I wouldn't be surprised if he's loaned out then eventually flogged

I'm only replying to posters like manc mag. If I don't reply, posters like Fish and JAysouthernmag ask me why I haven't responded ? In fact, I've asked mancmag the same question twice today....... Correction, you don't answer posts where you can't use your stock responses. Fuck, you won't even answer if you think getting into the Europa league this season will constitute success but getting into the Europa League - and even finishing 5th in the premiership - was booed and regarded as failure not so long ago. I'm not quite sure of the difference, can you explain ? I believe Alex and HF have also pointed this out, so apologies if you have explained already to them and I missed it. Can't even answer a simple question without mentioning what happend previously. There has been a lot of water under the bridge since then. We are talking about the present. Would you not consider a European place THIS season would be a success? I never said European football under the previous owners was a failure, just for the record As I said, I'm looking for the football club to set itself up and show ambition for the long term, not a flash in the pan run of games after selling its best players and pocketing the cash, which is short term. Please explain why 7th is success for Mike Ashley and failure for others ? Still no answer to the question then and the usual drivel too I will leave it there then and let other posters judge you by those responses you can judge me by how well the team do in the long term, however 4 years have passed and to date, Mike Ashley has got nowhere near his predecessors, despite adopting "better" policies. I rest my case

Respond to the points with a valid argument of why they are incorrect I've had enough of responding to you. I've tried to explain to you why the club is not set up to challenge for where it should. No you have not, all you do is spout the same old drivel about what happened years ago. The points I make above are valid and relevant to how the game is in 2011/2012 and the reason you can't address them is that your typical stock responses won't work. Now IF you can, please explain which of my points I made are incorrect bearing in mind its 2011/2012 season now, ok?? You also mentioned where we should be competing, where do you think we should realistically be competing? Champions? Top 4? Europa league? I'm not saying what happened years ago, I'm telling you how clubs are successful. Wake up. See the bit where you say "Arsenal could compete but Wenger chooses not to", replace that with "Newcastle could compete but Ashley chooses not to". Is that relevant enough for you ? It would be if a) you answered my points and maybe explain how and which teams you think we should be competing with. I look forward to your irrelevant answer "Newcastle could compete but Ashley decides not to" is bang on the button chum. I heard that, you said it in your previous answer. Can you please elaborate on WHICH teams we should be genuinely competing with and where would be an acceptable league position for us?? Do you accept/deny its harder to compete than it was previously due to the vast sums of money being spent by very wealthy owners? not for the first time....fuck me sideway. Do you ever read anything ? It is not "harder" for Newcastle United to compete at higher levels than the likes of Stoke, Wigan, Bolton, Blackburn, Villa etc, in fact it never was any harder. Do you understand this, do you actually read and understand anything ? Why are Newcastle United, with the 3rd biggest ground in the country and the 14th highest turnover in world football when Mike Ashley bought this club, selling their best players and pocketing the cash rather than backing their own appointed manager ? Sorry, I appear to have missed the bit where you said which teams we SHOULD be competing with, the ones you have mentioned above are teams we ARE competing with, how many players from those teams would get into our first 11?? I notice you didn't answer the question on where you think we should be finishing? See I've wrote it again just in case you missed it.

I'm only replying to posters like manc mag. If I don't reply, posters like Fish and JAysouthernmag ask me why I haven't responded ? In fact, I've asked mancmag the same question twice today....... Correction, you don't answer posts where you can't use your stock responses. Fuck, you won't even answer if you think getting into the Europa league this season will constitute success but getting into the Europa League - and even finishing 5th in the premiership - was booed and regarded as failure not so long ago. I'm not quite sure of the difference, can you explain ? I believe Alex and HF have also pointed this out, so apologies if you have explained already to them and I missed it. Can't even answer a simple question without mentioning what happend previously. There has been a lot of water under the bridge since then. We are talking about the present. Would you not consider a European place THIS season would be a success? I never said European football under the previous owners was a failure, just for the record As I said, I'm looking for the football club to set itself up and show ambition for the long term, not a flash in the pan run of games after selling its best players and pocketing the cash, which is short term. Please explain why 7th is success for Mike Ashley and failure for others ? Still no answer to the question then and the usual drivel too I will leave it there then and let other posters judge you by those responses

Respond to the points with a valid argument of why they are incorrect I've had enough of responding to you. I've tried to explain to you why the club is not set up to challenge for where it should. No you have not, all you do is spout the same old drivel about what happened years ago. The points I make above are valid and relevant to how the game is in 2011/2012 and the reason you can't address them is that your typical stock responses won't work. Now IF you can, please explain which of my points I made are incorrect bearing in mind its 2011/2012 season now, ok?? You also mentioned where we should be competing, where do you think we should realistically be competing? Champions? Top 4? Europa league? I'm not saying what happened years ago, I'm telling you how clubs are successful. Wake up. See the bit where you say "Arsenal could compete but Wenger chooses not to", replace that with "Newcastle could compete but Ashley chooses not to". Is that relevant enough for you ? It would be if a) you answered my points and maybe explain how and which teams you think we should be competing with. I look forward to your irrelevant answer "Newcastle could compete but Ashley decides not to" is bang on the button chum. I heard that, you said it in your previous answer. Can you please elaborate on WHICH teams we should be genuinely competing with and where would be an acceptable league position for us?? Do you accept/deny its harder to compete than it was previously due to the vast sums of money being spent by very wealthy owners?

I'm only replying to posters like manc mag. If I don't reply, posters like Fish and JAysouthernmag ask me why I haven't responded ? In fact, I've asked mancmag the same question twice today....... Correction, you don't answer posts where you can't use your stock responses. Fuck, you won't even answer if you think getting into the Europa league this season will constitute success but getting into the Europa League - and even finishing 5th in the premiership - was booed and regarded as failure not so long ago. I'm not quite sure of the difference, can you explain ? I believe Alex and HF have also pointed this out, so apologies if you have explained already to them and I missed it. Can't even answer a simple question without mentioning what happend previously. There has been a lot of water under the bridge since then. We are talking about the present. Would you not consider a European place THIS season would be a success? I never said European football under the previous owners was a failure, just for the record

Respond to the points with a valid argument of why they are incorrect I've had enough of responding to you. I've tried to explain to you why the club is not set up to challenge for where it should. No you have not, all you do is spout the same old drivel about what happened years ago. The points I make above are valid and relevant to how the game is in 2011/2012 and the reason you can't address them is that your typical stock responses won't work. Now IF you can, please explain which of my points I made are incorrect bearing in mind its 2011/2012 season now, ok?? You also mentioned where we should be competing, where do you think we should realistically be competing? Champions? Top 4? Europa league? I'm not saying what happened years ago, I'm telling you how clubs are successful. Wake up. See the bit where you say "Arsenal could compete but Wenger chooses not to", replace that with "Newcastle could compete but Ashley chooses not to". Is that relevant enough for you ? It would be if a) you answered my points and maybe explain how and which teams you think we should be competing with. I look forward to your irrelevant answer

I'm only replying to posters like manc mag. If I don't reply, posters like Fish and JAysouthernmag ask me why I haven't responded ? In fact, I've asked mancmag the same question twice today....... Correction, you don't answer posts where you can't use your stock responses. Fuck, you won't even answer if you think getting into the Europa league this season will constitute success

Once again Leazes fails to give a simple answer, this fucker has to be a politician. Is a Europa league place a success?? Jesus questions don't come much easier. Here try this, delete as appropriate It would constitute a success. YES/NO

Respond to the points with a valid argument of why they are incorrect I've had enough of responding to you. I've tried to explain to you why the club is not set up to challenge for where it should. No you have not, all you do is spout the same old drivel about what happened years ago. The points I make above are valid and relevant to how the game is in 2011/2012 and the reason you can't address them is that your typical stock responses won't work. Now IF you can, please explain which of my points I made are incorrect bearing in mind its 2011/2012 season now, ok?? You also mentioned where we should be competing, where do you think we should realistically be competing? Champions? Top 4? Europa league?