ChezGiven

I think Aeris said that Marveaux has better vision for a pass He's a fucking idiot.

I'm pretty sure its a parody account set up by a mackem with the sole objective of being used in future internet arguments to refute the fact that they are ones who are obsessed.

The lad who sits behind him i reckon.

No other record of you buying the ticket existed apart from on your phone? What a nightmare.

What a load of shite.

You'll have to explain that one.

He can play like that though, maybe he just had more energy when he was younger or the French league was just slower. You can't have it all I suppose.

My only observation on Cabaye yesterday was that sometimes he is in space and instead of dribbling, passing and moving, he looks for the pass every time. Not saying its a bad thing when he can pass the way he does but there are times when he could run with the ball a bit more. That would mean him carrying on those runs which perhaps he is instructed not to do in that role he has. He scored a few goals for Lille getting into the box with neat little one twos rather than his now more typical long range efforts.

Pardew is priming Ben Arfa to return hungry and in form so I share his optimism after yesterday. We've got a fairly settled first 11 who are getting used to playing with each other, a world class talent to come back into the side and only City who we should write off getting points against.

Santon looked like he had picked up a knock before he came off. Was struggling to make it back over the half way line about a minute before he came off.

Isn't Gemmill's estate a Volvo?

My first match in donkeys.

The only thing you're repeating Dave is yourself.

We were, we had Simpson, Obertan and Marveaux in our side, there were plenty of opportunities for them to get at us but for one reason or another they didnt. A lot of those reasons were down to Pardew's tactics so saying it like i did maybe sounds unfair. Some of those reasons were also because they hadnt done their homework on Simpson, Obertan and Marveaux. Apart from the 2 fine saves, they also had the Eto'o scuffed shot and the chest / volley from the edge of the box which if it had hit the target was a goal. We had the best chance of the game but they will be disappointed not to have got at us more. Yes, a lot to do with our set up but they didnt take advantage of the opportunities our side presented.

"They looked there for the taking" They looked incredibly organised as you'd expect from their manager, they gave us no time on the ball which is exactly how to play on that pitch. They got tight and pressed us hard, forcing errors and making any short passing very difficult. They were good on the ball, slick, fast paced and had some highly talented players making dangerous runs all over the place. We were there for the taking and they didnt manage it. To say the opposite just proves Gemmill's point.

At least 10! He doesn't look the type to have a hairy arse either.

I'd put good money on Street Spice being run by a bunch of standers.

I watched that Men who Stare at Goats film the other day. No recipes in it though. Madhur Jaffrey's book has a chapter / essay on goat iirc.

Whilst sitting down on a chair, can you lean to one side enough to lift the opposite thigh off the chair? If you cant, you must have a massive arse.

As soon as it was announced he was "injured" i called bullshit. http://www.shieldsgazette.com/sport/football/newcastle-united/newacstle-skipper-fabricio-coloccini-could-face-longer-spell-on-sidelines-1-5472644

Hugh Jarse tbh.

Back to fronters are an odd bunch, i dont want to even entertain the idea of shit being flicked onto or even just smeared towards my sack (or hand cupping sack). Here's what the professional have to say on the matter. Back to front is the new standing up.

"sitter, careful folder, front to backer" You could eat your dinner off it.

Stoned and Starving boys, it's quality.