2nd most popular boys name in the UK

[ChezGiven 0]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

 

Then why quote the figure you did?

 

Do you know what a sample is?

 

Its a little jar containing wee.

[Fop 1]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

 

Then why quote the figure you did?

 

Do you know what a sample is?

 

Its a little jar containing wee.

In Chris's case quite fitting.

[Jusoda Kid 1]

Fuck off Mo, it does, it's not even our country any more.

Since when is it your country? Fuck off back to Narnia!

 

 

Fuck off back to Bradford

[The Fish 9210]

Sorry Stevie, I was busy today.

 

I'm saying that Meenzer was using those terms ironically and if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too.

 

It isn't however carte blanche, allowing certain terms to be bandied about under the veil of irony. Darkie is no where near as offensive as Nigger. As you well know.

[Guest Stevie]

Sorry Stevie, I was busy today.

 

I'm saying that Meenzer was using those terms ironically and if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too.

 

It isn't however carte blanche, allowing certain terms to be bandied about under the veil of irony. Darkie is no where near as offensive as Nigger. As you well know.

What a fucking idiot :icon_lol: :icon_lol:

 

That is hilarious, and this cunts been made a mod. You should put that in your rules on the rule guidance page. "if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too." Basically stating if that someone wants to use racist terminology when trying to be ironic, then this forum condones it. Thanks for clearing that up.

[Kid Dynamite 6082]

Fuck off Mo, it does, it's not even our country any more.

Since when is it your country? Fuck off back to Narnia!

 

 

Fuck off back to Bradford

 

Glad my avatar quote has been vindicated by this thread

[Happy Face 29]

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

...and just to go back to this. You're the lying whore in this case.

 

You can't say based on what proprtion of the population was muslim 8 years ago, and what proportion is now. How much that population has increased. You can only say how much the proportion has increased.

 

So even if your 4% IS a reported best guess. In no way shape or form does that correlate with a 25% increase in muslim population.

 

If the entire UK population has grown by 0.5% and the Muslim population grew by (say) 1% in the same time it might have caused the jump from 3% to 4% as a proportion.

 

That assumes your 4% is a researched figure.

 

Yes you can, you can do anything with statistics, it's all in how you present them (as you should well know).

 

You can if you make them up as you go along...as you did just then.

 

Again only if Fop make up your figures too

 

What?

[Happy Face 29]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

 

Then why quote the figure you did?

 

Do you know what a sample is?

 

Do you know why you quoted the figure you did?

 

Because it came from actual research I quoted the source for.

[Monkeys Fist 39159]

Can I suggest a new forum, like the Gerld one, but titled;

Fopped

where all threads that have been fopped can be quietly placed to rot?

[Andrew 4263]

Can I suggest a new forum, like the Gerld one, but titled;

Fopped

where all threads that have been fopped can be quietly placed to rot?

 

its called deleting

[Tom 13915]

To be honest Fop's quite well behaved and well liked in the secret forum.

[adios 717]

To be honest Fop's quite well behaved and well liked in the secret forum.

 

That's just a euphemism for your bum, isn't it?

[Tom 13915]

[Monkeys Fist 39159]

To be honest Fop's quite well behaved and well liked in the secret forum.

sounds like a real fun place.

[Tom 13915]

[LeazesMag 0]

To be honest Fop's quite well behaved and well liked in the secret forum.

 

 

oh dear.

 

I didn't think that this place would stoop down to the pathetic way of doing things like Newcastle Online

[Tom 13915]

I was only joking man

[Meenzer 14136]

The first rule of the secret forum is: you do not talk about the secret forum.

 

The second rule of the secret forum is: you do not talk about... no, wait, I got that wrong. The second rule is: no smoking.

[The Fish 9210]

Sorry Stevie, I was busy today.

 

I'm saying that Meenzer was using those terms ironically and if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too.

 

It isn't however carte blanche, allowing certain terms to be bandied about under the veil of irony. Darkie is no where near as offensive as Nigger. As you well know.

What a fucking idiot

 

That is hilarious, and this cunts been made a mod. You should put that in your rules on the rule guidance page. "if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too." Basically stating if that someone wants to use racist terminology when trying to be ironic, then this forum condones it. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

come off it Stevie, you know fine well you're being argumentative for the sake of it. If you can't see the difference between "Darkie" and "Nigger", well, you should just give up your speaking out loud privileges as you're obviously guilty of wasting them.

[Fop 1]

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

...and just to go back to this. You're the lying whore in this case.

 

You can't say based on what proprtion of the population was muslim 8 years ago, and what proportion is now. How much that population has increased. You can only say how much the proportion has increased.

 

So even if your 4% IS a reported best guess. In no way shape or form does that correlate with a 25% increase in muslim population.

 

If the entire UK population has grown by 0.5% and the Muslim population grew by (say) 1% in the same time it might have caused the jump from 3% to 4% as a proportion.

 

That assumes your 4% is a researched figure.

 

Yes you can, you can do anything with statistics, it's all in how you present them (as you should well know).

 

You can if you make them up as you go along...as you did just then.

 

Again only if Fop make up your figures too

 

What?

 

Indeed.

[Fop 1]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

 

Then why quote the figure you did?

 

Do you know what a sample is?

 

Do you know why you quoted the figure you did?

 

Because it came from actual research I quoted the source for.

 

You quoted A figure, yes.

[Fop 1]

Can I suggest a new forum, like the Gerld one, but titled;

Fopped

where all threads that have been fopped can be quietly placed to rot?

 

 

Although you'd never be out of there.

 

To be honest Fop's quite well behaved and well liked in the secret forum.

 

It's true.

[Guest Stevie]

Sorry Stevie, I was busy today.

 

I'm saying that Meenzer was using those terms ironically and if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too.

 

It isn't however carte blanche, allowing certain terms to be bandied about under the veil of irony. Darkie is no where near as offensive as Nigger. As you well know.

What a fucking idiot

 

That is hilarious, and this cunts been made a mod. You should put that in your rules on the rule guidance page. "if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too." Basically stating if that someone wants to use racist terminology when trying to be ironic, then this forum condones it. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

come off it Stevie, you know fine well you're being argumentative for the sake of it. If you can't see the difference between "Darkie" and "Nigger", well, you should just give up your speaking out loud privileges as you're obviously guilty of wasting them.

I can't even get my head around the breathtaking ignorance in your post. I know you're from Blyth but fuck me. Just incredible. The silence from the other moderators is notable. This is one of the biggest :oh no: moments I've seen on toontastic. Measuring two racist terms against each other, and the one you perceive as milder is passed as acceptable. As for nigger being a stronger word that darkie, I completely and utterly disagree. Nigger is a word used more by Americans the British people, and is used by black people as an every day word about other black people, but the rule is white people are not allowed to say it. Darkie is a more British derogatory term for black people, and in my view and in the view of others I've discussed it with equally as bad as "nigger", maybe even more so purely in my opinion due to the way the word "nigger" has almost been commercialised. Your ignorance is beyond staggering. When you started on this stance I almost spat my corn flakes out. Lets hope the newspaper don't see this, unless it's the Daily Mail you're going to join. Oh dear.

[Monkeys Fist 39159]

Can I suggest a new forum, like the Gerld one, but titled;

Fopped

where all threads that have been fopped can be quietly placed to rot?

 

 

Although you'd never be out of there.

 

To be honest Fop's quite well behaved and well liked in the secret forum.

 

It's true.

let's try it and see, eh?

[Happy Face 29]

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

...and just to go back to this. You're the lying whore in this case.

 

You can't say based on what proprtion of the population was muslim 8 years ago, and what proportion is now. How much that population has increased. You can only say how much the proportion has increased.

 

So even if your 4% IS a reported best guess. In no way shape or form does that correlate with a 25% increase in muslim population.

 

If the entire UK population has grown by 0.5% and the Muslim population grew by (say) 1% in the same time it might have caused the jump from 3% to 4% as a proportion.

 

That assumes your 4% is a researched figure.

 

Yes you can, you can do anything with statistics, it's all in how you present them (as you should well know).

 

You can if you make them up as you go along...as you did just then.

 

Again only if Fop make up your figures too

 

What?

 

Indeed.

 

I'm sorry Fop but you seem to have real trouble with expressing yourself clearly.

 

Are you still insisting that the muslim population of the UK has grown 25% in the last year?

 

Or are you disagreeing with something I've said? If so, what exactly, I'll be happy to discuss it in more detail sensibly and concede wherever I've made a mistake (which is often the case).

 

If your point is that ALL statistics are useless, then you're more of a dunce than anyone could have imagined. The national office of statistics produce very accurate data, that when interpreted correctly illuminate many issues.

 

When you come along and bastardise the numbers to come up with 25% bollocks, I agree it's useless. It's as bad as those fuckwit scientists in The Sun who come up with an imaginary formula for the perfect penalty, or the best pair of tits to advertise a new beer.

Edited September 11, 2009 by Happy Face