Gemmill 34441 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I'd have him back for 10 million, no bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4218 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 aye me too, we're still not sure if we'll lose Cisse and Ba to the ACON and with 4 competitions and the inevitable injuries that will crop up through the season having a player capable of the level Carroll can produce will be valuable. more this Less this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 1 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I'd have him back for 10 million, no bother. I think most would but I can't see Liverpool selling him for £25 mill less they paid for him after just 18 months Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Maybe it would be easier to sell to us if they still owe money on the original deal(which I assume they do). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34441 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I think most would but I can't see Liverpool selling him for 25 mill less they paid for him after just 18 months 2J wouldn't cos Carroll made him cry real, salty tears when he left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 If Liverpool dont sell him for 10m this summer that means they have to play him and he has to score goals otherwise it doesnt make any sense financially. If he stays and doesnt play, then his price goes down. If they dont want him long-term, he has to play and score enough for the price to go up and then get rid of him. Or they keep him and leave him on the bench, in which case they should sell him now. Whichever way you look at it, if he is not part of their plans, selling him for a certain price makes sense. That could be as low as 10m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADP 0 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 If we got him back for 10m then we should sell a dvd about the whole thing next to the 7-1 spurs, 5-0 manure and 5-1 mackems in the club shop. Bonus feature entitled: Ashley - where IS the 25m? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34441 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 HF fucking loading the stat cannon, sticking his hands over his ears and turning away.... BOOM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 5906 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 25mil to loan him for 18months. Blows the Gyan loan fee the scruffs seemed so proud about out of the water! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 2J wouldn't cos Carroll made him cry real, salty tears when he left. Nah I actually still rate him as a player but I don't think he suits the way we play anymore, and I don't think he'd return to not be guaranteed a place in the first team. With the personnel we have got 4-3-3 is clearly our best formation as was demonstrated last season, so to change a formation for Carroll (who I don't think is as good as Ba or Cisse) would be absolutely absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 People talk about the 4-3-3 as though it was employed against a variety of sides and styles and always worked. I may be mistaken but that formation was deployed against mainly the weaker sides in the league, no? Or was at least successful against the west broms etc? I may be wrong like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinh9 0 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I think most would but I can't see Liverpool selling him for £25 mill less they paid for him after just 18 months With the way that clubs value players as "assets" it would be a staggering loss for them to sell at anything less than 25 million right now. That simply isn't going to happen, which is why you see a loan move being touted. You get the wages off the books but you retain the asset. Only a loan move makes sense for Andy- especially because a really strong season could recoup some of his value. I think it would be a mistake to bring him back here. A player like that is going to look for first-team football or he'd just fight at Liverpool. We shouldn't offer first-team football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I have to be honest, I'd fucking love to see him back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16635 Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Evens to re-join us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Think about what I told you on October 22nd 2010. *Touches nose* People are definitely round the table, not him though he's still away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Think about what I told you on October 22nd 2010. *Touches nose* People are definitely round the table, not him though he's still away. Let's just hope it's not an exchange plus cash deal with one of our big boys. *touches wood*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Let's just hope it's not an exchange plus cash deal with one of our big boys. *touches wood*. I'm sworn to secrecy so I'm not going in to details, but the source I trust 10000%, and where he got it from well, the man commands respect. All I know is there's a table, they're at one end, we're at the other with a blank piece of paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4218 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Are Liverpool "they" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Are Liverpool "they" ? It's fair to say they're a North West team with many supporters with a penchant to wear low quality sports clothing on nights out yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26326 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Same source who told you about Tiote's move? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Same source who told you about Tiote's move? No and not the same source who told me Pardew was coming 7 weeks before he did, and before anyone had even mentioned his name neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4218 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 So you're saying we're going to sign someone from Liverpool? Or them someone from us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 So you're saying we're going to sign someone from Liverpool? No I'm saying we're talking to Liverpool. 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4218 Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 So that's utterly meaningless then? Just some vague Saturday morning attention seeking you can claim to be "right" about if something does happen that will never come up again if nothing does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now