ewerk 34928 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Not guilty on one count, jury still deliberating on another as they have thus far been unable to reach a unanimous decision. Looks like the pewbs defence worked. Right up there with 'if the glove don't fit'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 8112 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Tbf there's not much in the texts to suggest oral sex took place. It's nailed on that he's guilty on the other count though. Some daft cunt is obviously dragging their heels over the decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 34928 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1458 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:06, StraightEdgeWizard said: Tbf there's not much in the texts to suggest oral sex took place. It's nailed on that he's guilty on the other count though. Some daft cunt is obviously dragging their heels over the decisionGuilty on the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1458 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Was that the digital? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 34928 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Aye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 38370 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:10, ewerk said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 34928 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 (edited) It'll be interesting to see how long he gets. Certainly has to be custodial now. Well it was probably always going to be custodial. Edited March 2, 2016 by ewerk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 8112 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Hope the ugly bastard gets made into someone's 15 year old bitch in prison Look forward to the Mackems statement to explain away their reasons for playing a paedo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 47118 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Guilty of the second charge. That'll be clink time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53531 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 6 in a row forever asterisked for "digital interference". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 4489 Posted March 2, 2016 Author Share Posted March 2, 2016 And they're still deleting all threads raised about it. Kim Jong Un must own that site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1458 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Judge has told him that a custodial sentence is almost inevitable now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 8112 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Guidelines are for between 4-10 year sentence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 38370 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Quite surprised about it. Not that I believed his version for a second but I thought he might get away with both the more serious offences due to lack of evidence. That's some serious prison time as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 34928 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:29, StraightEdgeWizard said: Look forward to the Mackems statement to explain away their reasons for playing a paedo http://www.safc.com/news/club-news/2016/march/club-statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4795 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:50, Alex said: Quite surprised about it. Not that I believed his version for a second but I thought he might get away with both the more serious offences due to lack of evidence. That's some serious prison time as well. "You felt turned on" was pretty damning I think. Whether he was shaved or not was more a his worrd against hers deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53531 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:51, ewerk said: http://www.safc.com/news/club-news/2016/march/club-statement Whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 38370 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:53, NJS said: "You felt turned on" was pretty damning I think. Whether he was shaved or not was more a his worrd against hers deal. I would've said I'd felt her tits. Hypothetically, obviously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 34928 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4795 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:51, ewerk said: http://www.safc.com/news/club-news/2016/march/club-statement They're saying he lied under oath - so sue him then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonMarshy 2 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonMarshy 2 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:51, ewerk said: http://www.safc.com/news/club-news/2016/march/club-statement "sure thank god you got him guys! good job we didnt have anything to do with helping him prolong this or use him to escape relegation or anything, whooo-eee no sir! ah well, bad guy goes to jail and everyone is happy! punch anyone? lovely fruit punch right over here!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53531 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 On 02/03/2016 at 16:56, ToonMarshy said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 8112 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 No response to the claim they had access to ALL of the texts he sent her. Using terms like 'presumably' isn't much of a defence either I hope the FA slam the cunts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now