Donald Trump

[Ayatollah Hermione 15458]

There’s always next year. Maybe he can negotiate a peace deal between Wykiki and 95% of the Earth’s population next time round. Got to be easier than dealing with this lot 

[Gemmill 53626]

On 24/06/2025 at 20:35, Rayvin said:

US intel suggests all 3 nuclear sites are largely intact, and that any delay posed to Iran's development in this field is measured in months rather than years.

 

Well worth it, I'm sure.

 

They've now found "new intelligence" that backs Trump.  I think it was located next to the alternative facts. 

 

Proper Kim Jong Un shit. Next time the intelligence agencies won't make the mistake of disagreeing with him in the first place though. 

 

We're a few years away from them posting double digit economic growth figures that Trump just makes up and no one is allowed to dispute. 

[Craig 8077]

As was mentioned in the media yesterday, if they've completely obliterated  Iran's nuclear capability then surely there's no necessity on them to focus on them any longer. So why the continued interest? 

[Isegrim 10910]

[Isegrim 10910]

Fascists.

[Dazzler 13178]

1 minute ago, Isegrim said:

Fascists.

We need to make sure you aren’t a snowflake who says hurty words about our very thick skinned leader.

[ewerk 34945]

29 minutes ago, Isegrim said:

Fascists.

 

Well that's you on the visa blacklist.

[Toonpack 12649]

31 minutes ago, Isegrim said:

 

Fascists.

 

I'll take your word for it, if anyone would know .............

[Monkeys Fist 47180]

1 hour ago, Toonpack said:

 

I'll take your word for it, if anyone would know .............

[RobinRobin 13240]

 

Trump's America 

[Dazzler 13178]

4 hours ago, RobinRobin said:

 

Trump's America 

It's not just America tbh...

[Monkeys Fist 47180]

It’ll be interesting see the reaction of the governments of the US’s allies when civil war breaks out there and the right-minded folk are fighting to oust the Fascists in government. 
 

Who will they support, at what point will they drop support for Trump and his cuntlets, or will they just ignore it and pretend everything is hunky D? 

[Renton 24972]

On 24/06/2025 at 20:35, Rayvin said:

US intel suggests all 3 nuclear sites are largely intact, and that any delay posed to Iran's development in this field is measured in months rather than years.

 

Well worth it, I'm sure.

 

This is my worry now. Iran are going to be more determined than ever to get nuclear weapons. This will not bring any type of stability to the ME. My own view is that Iran is led by Islamic fundamentalists who will nor act rationally like other nuclear armed actors such as Israel or even North Korea. I genuinely think they would use a nuclear weapon preemptively to facilitate their passage to paradise. These people really believe that Israel is  "cancerous tumour" and the US is the great Satan (and recent activities will have reinforced this). Al Khameni is an old man now, he doesn't give a sit what happens to his own people. If he thinks the destruction of Israel, no matter that it will also destroy Iran, will deliver paradise, then that's what he will do. And that risk has only increased.

 

Interestingly of course, there are many Americans backing Trump for similar reasons. They want the prophecy of Armageddon to materialise so they experience the rapture. I wish this religious lunacy was confined to the dust bin of history but it hasn't, and might be the death of us all.

[Rayvin 6697]

6 minutes ago, Renton said:

 

This is my worry now. Iran are going to be more determined than ever to get nuclear weapons. This will not bring any type of stability to the ME. My own view is that Iran is led by Islamic fundamentalists who will nor act rationally like other nuclear armed actors such as Israel or even North Korea. I genuinely think they would use a nuclear weapon preemptively to facilitate their passage to paradise. These people really believe that Israel is  "cancerous tumour" and the US is the great Satan (and recent activities will have reinforced this). Al Khameni is an old man now, he doesn't give a sit what happens to his own people. If he thinks the destruction of Israel, no matter that it will also destroy Iran, will deliver paradise, then that's what he will do. And that risk has only increased.

 

Interestingly of course, there are many Americans backing Trump for similar reasons. They want the prophecy of Armageddon to materialise so they experience the rapture. I wish this religious lunacy was confined to the dust bin of history but it hasn't, and might be the death of us all.

 

If Iran doesn't give a shit about its own people, why did it agree to a ceasefire? Why did it commit to the minimum possible retaliation on the US in a bid to avoid escalating things? Why has it taken steps to de-escalate the issue at every turn? Why hasn't it created nukes so far at all, it's had plenty of time to do so? I think you're blinded by your fears and prejudices about religion on this.

 

You're conflating Iran with Hamas and they are two very different entities. Hamas is a trapped animal prepared to destroy everything around it if it can just take down the thing that has it cornered. Iran is not in the same position at all.

 

And incidentally, we have plenty of Israelis, politicians included, calling for outright genocide in Gaza now. https://www.trtworld.com/middle-east/database-exposes-500-instances-of-israeli-incitement-to-genocide-in-gaza-16537146

 

I don't understand why they have your trust based on your red lines for Iran.

[Renton 24972]

3 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

If Iran doesn't give a shit about its own people, why did it agree to a ceasefire? Why did it commit to the minimum possible retaliation on the US in a bid to avoid escalating things? Why has it taken steps to de-escalate the issue at every turn? Why hasn't it created nukes so far at all, it's had plenty of time to do so? I think you're blinded by your fears and prejudices about religion on this.

 

You're conflating Iran with Hamas and they are two very different entities. Hamas is a trapped animal prepared to destroy everything around it if it can just take down the thing that has it cornered. Iran is not in the same position at all.

 

And incidentally, we have plenty of Israelis, politicians included, calling for outright genocide in Gaza now. https://www.trtworld.com/middle-east/database-exposes-500-instances-of-israeli-incitement-to-genocide-in-gaza-16537146

 

I don't understand why they have your trust based on your red lines for Iran.

 

My fear is that Iran will agree to cease fires, completely withdraw from the nuclear non proliferation obligations, get rid of inspectors, and develop a nuke in secret. I believe Iran IS different even to a genocidal Israel, which is a different issue. At the moment I am restricted to my phone so can't really articulate fully why, but if you will indulge me, Matthew Syed says it here.

 

 

 

Yes, I might be wrong. Maybe this is just pure prejudice on my behalf, but I think it applies to all religious fundamentalists of all abrahamic faiths. If you REALLY believe in this stuff, you will sacrifice literally everything for your God. I guess it's not even irrational from that pov. That's the difference. 

[Rayvin 6697]

13 minutes ago, Renton said:

 

My fear is that Iran will agree to cease fires, completely withdraw from the nuclear non proliferation obligations, get rid of inspectors, and develop a nuke in secret. I believe Iran IS different even to a genocidal Israel, which is a different issue. At the moment I am restricted to my phone so can't really articulate fully why, but if you will indulge me, Matthew Syed says it here.

 

 

 

Yes, I might be wrong. Maybe this is just pure prejudice on my behalf, but I think it applies to all religious fundamentalists of all abrahamic faiths. If you REALLY believe in this stuff, you will sacrifice literally everything for your God. I guess it's not even irrational from that pov. That's the difference. 

 

But then they could just have done it by now. No one can stop Iran developing nukes if it wants to - no one. Not Israel, not the US. The best any external entity can do is try to force regime change, but that isn't a guarantee. IMO Iran is adopting the same strategy that Sadam attempted to use - he didn't have WMDs but he didn't actually tell anyone that because it was more useful for him to be in a position whereby people assumed he was dangerous than to actually justify that perception. Iran doesn't need nukes, it just needs to look like it can be close enough to getting them at any given point for Israel to leave it the fuck alone. And the reason I'm confident that this is the strategy they're working to is that they could have had nukes by now if they really wanted them.

 

I've done a lot of reading over the past few days about the Iranian regime and its politics, and it seems that its regional militias are worth more to it than any nuclear weapon would be. Moreover, it seems to be focused more on Saudi than Israel or the West - which I would argue supports the idea that it is a politically motivated actor, not a religiously motivated one.

 

Triggernometry is a right wing youtube channel that talks highbrow but we wouldn't cite it in any other context.

 

EDIT - if you don't believe me on that last point, look at their most recent videos. They've interviewed Reform's chairman, they've got another view a few days earlier talking about how Britain is a nation of immigrants, South African farm murders, yet another video on immigration into the UK, the end of wokeism, how the left is to blame for creating the right, another video on UK immigration... that's going back 1 month. That's the sort of channel this is, and the one you're aligning yourself with on this point. Maybe they're right, but I don't know why I should believe they are based on the nonsense of the rest of their channel.

[Renton 24972]

8 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

But then they could just have done it by now. No one can stop Iran developing nukes if it wants to - no one. Not Israel, not the US. The best any external entity can do is try to force regime change, but that isn't a guarantee. IMO Iran is adopting the same strategy that Sadam attempted to use - he didn't have WMDs but he didn't actually tell anyone that because it was more useful for him to be in a position whereby people assumed he was dangerous than to actually justify that perception. Iran doesn't need nukes, it just needs to look like it can be close enough to getting them at any given point for Israel to leave it the fuck alone. And the reason I'm confident that this is the strategy they're working to is that they could have had nukes by now if they really wanted them.

 

I've done a lot of reading over the past few days about the Iranian regime and its politics, and it seems that its regional militias are worth more to it than any nuclear weapon would be. Moreover, it seems to be focused more on Saudi than Israel or the West - which I would argue supports the idea that it is a politically motivated actor, not a religiously motivated one.

 

Triggernometry is a right wing youtube channel that talks highbrow but we wouldn't cite it in any other context.

 

Don't know anything about the channel, it did pop into my feed and I listened to it. I don't regard Syed as a right wing nut job, and his dad was Iranian so he'll have his own viewpoint. Maybe it just reinforced my prejudice, fair enough. But nothing scares me more than fundamental religious believers with a track history in martyrdom. 

The tension and conflict with Saudi btw, is very much sectarian and religious motivated. People always brush away the obvious fucking elephant in the room. The problems in the ME, like countless wars and conflicts before them, all stem from religion. You have a confluence of Christians, jews, and muslims,  each of many different sects. Never going to end well.

[Rayvin 6697]

3 minutes ago, Renton said:

 

Don't know anything about the channel, it did pop into my feed and I listened to it. I don't regard Syed as a right wing nut job, and his dad was Iranian so he'll have his own viewpoint. Maybe it just reinforced my prejudice, fair enough. But nothing scares me more than fundamental religious believers with a track history in martyrdom. 

The tension and conflict with Saudi btw, is very much sectarian and religious motivated. People always brush away the obvious fucking elephant in the room. The problems in the ME, like countless wars and conflicts before them, all stem from religion. You have a confluence of Christians, jews, and muslims,  each of many different sects. Never going to end well.

 

If you removed all religion from the Middle East tomorrow, people would still be fighting over resources and power. The things that people actually fight over in reality. I've never understood this idea that religion is the root of all conflict when we have so much conflict coming out of the US and Russia, neither of whom are doing it for religiously motivated reasons. The US has actually used nukes on people and yet we still worry about the religious doing it. Anyone is capable of it - I don't buy for a moment that Putin wouldn't launch nukes if he was backed into a corner enough incidentally, as Syed does. He said Putin wouldn't do it for fear of being killed in response... like, what? That's not a baseline concern even I would have in certain situations, let alone someone as motivated as Putin. It's speculative nonsense that assumes all non religious people are entirely rational actors, and all religious people are not. 

 

Maybe you are right and Iran would try to destroy the world the second it gets nukes, but then surely it would be doing this already anyway, surely if it was that motivated by this issue, it would have bent itself into fully. Instead it appears to be dithering around for 3 decades and just trying to look tough. To me that seems more like a political calculation than religious fervour.

[RobinRobin 13240]

For what it's worth, IMHO Iran is a fundamentalist, autocratic, theocracy. Just because it decided not to be obliterated by the US does not make it politically astute, just sensible. 

While i accept that both Trump and Putin are almost certainly atheist (how could anyone else be above them?) they do regularly rely on religion for motivation and probably justification. 

But what do I know? 

[Rayvin 6697]

2 minutes ago, RobinRobin said:

For what it's worth, IMHO Iran is a fundamentalist, autocratic, theocracy. Just because it decided not to be obliterated by the US does not make it politically astute, just sensible. 

While i accept that both Trump and Putin are almost certainly atheist (how could anyone else be above them?) they do regularly rely on religion for motivation and probably justification. 

But what do I know? 

 

Yes, religion used as propaganda to motivate idiots into all sorts of things, no argument there. But then so are many other things. WMDs were used to motivate idiots (such as myself at the time, young and naive as I was) into supporting the Iraq war when it was actually about consolidation of Western regional power, encirclement of Russia, and oil. NATO has been used by Putin to justify Ukraine even though he came out the other day and proclaimed that Ukraine and Russia are all one people and that the whole country belongs to him. The fact that such governments may use religion here and there does not speak to why they do any of these things, just how they ensure at least some of their support.

 

You make a good point about how they were sensible in choosing not to be obliterated by the US. In fact, that's the same point I was making. If we can rely on them to be sensible in that situation, and we can observe that good sense, why do we say that they would suddenly throw it out of the window if they had a nuke?

[spongebob toonpants 4633]

32 minutes ago, Renton said:

The problems in the ME, like countless wars and conflicts before them, all stem from religion

The problems all stem from earlier British imperialism and more recently USA imperialism, and exploitation of resources mainly oil

The West created these fundamentalists. Same as it ever was