Generic small time football blather thread FOREVER

[Toonpack 9103]

[Dazzler 9269]

43 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

You need big balls to be a success in the premier league, so this fella is fucked.

[PaddockLad 16991]

2 hours ago, ewerk said:

I didn't know wyki was a closet St. Mirren fan.

 

I think you’ll find I’ve already formed the TT branch of the St Mirren supporters club. If you want to apply for membership PM Andrew for a form  

 

18 hours ago, PaddockLad said:

Think I might start supporting St Mirren

 

 

 

[Toonpack 9103]

St Mirren PAH, St fucking Liedown cunts

[PaddockLad 16991]

1 hour ago, Toonpack said:

St Mirren PAH, St fucking Liedown cunts

Whits wrang wi yer girney lookin puss the day ya bam?

[ewerk 30159]

Fair play to this little scamp.

 

 

[Guest MrRaspberryJam]

Shocking haircut. 

[Gemmill 44090]

Future young offender, that one. 

[ewerk 30159]

 

[Dazzler 9269]

The spending cap has been voted in. man city, man utd and villa all voted against it and chelsea abstained. Fuck know what it all means but there's going to be a spending cap now.

[Gemmill 44090]

Won't come in immediately (think it's not til 25/26), but the prevailing view seems to be that in the short to medium term, it'll be good news for us and will loosen the purse strings a decent amount. 

[Dazzler 9269]

8 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

Won't come in immediately (think it's not til 25/26), but the prevailing view seems to be that in the short to medium term, it'll be good news for us and will loosen the purse strings a decent amount. 

Surely that's the same for villa though, so a bit odd they'd vote against it. Unless they are so cock sure of themselves and think they'll be able to maintain top 4 form next year whilst getting bummed by celtic on Wednesday's

[ewerk 30159]

15 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

Won't come in immediately (think it's not til 25/26), but the prevailing view seems to be that in the short to medium term, it'll be good news for us and will loosen the purse strings a decent amount. 

 

Not really, the 85% spending cap as a percentage of revenue still applies and is reduced to 70% by UEFA rules.

[Dazzler 9269]

23 minutes ago, ewerk said:

 

Not really, the 85% spending cap as a percentage of revenue still applies and is reduced to 70% by UEFA rules.

Is this not to replace the 85% spending cap? If not then what is the fucking point, it doesn't level anything. "You can spend c£400m this year, but only if it's less than 85% of your revenue" is fucking mentally over complicated. 

[ewerk 30159]

I think it's basically to stop the biggest earning clubs taking advantage of the 85% figure as obviously that will be multiples of the revenue of the lowest earning club. But in effect I don't think this will really change anything as it's only really Man City and Chelsea that are adversely affected by it.

[Gemmill 44090]

 

 

 

That's what I'm basing it on. 

 

[ewerk 30159]

Yes but the anchoring element is irrelevant unless we can grow our revenues substantially.

 

 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 3788]

Ffs let clubs do what they want and go bust if they fuck up. 

[Holden McGroin 6451]

Are we signing Mbappe or not?

[Ayatollah Hermione 13760]

My take on this new financial nonsense is that we wouldn’t have floated it and voted for it if it wasn’t going to help us bridge the gap 

[Tdansmith 3201]

[ewerk 30159]

That is funny given how utterly shit Chelsea have been.

[ewerk 30159]

This is the shit we’re up against regarding PSR. Fanks Mike.

 

 

[Toonpack 9103]

Could the accountants finally redeem our accountant.

 

 

[Gemmill 44090]

This lot are fucking desperate to get relegated.

 

Their fans need to let some miidnight fireworks off outside Companies House.