Kid Dynamite 6082 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Aye, City will fee like they've made a mistake there. Especially with KDB getting on now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 17034 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Best money Chelsea have spent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 1 hour ago, Holden McGroin said: Palmer is absolute quality to be fair. And it’s first full season. Pretty incredible really. He still looks like he is a bit of a twat though. The (alleged) fact that he's a bit of a twat is the main reason he didn't stay with us imo. We didn't want to let him go, but he wanted game time. It was a good deal all around to be fair. He got game time, chelsea got a good player, we got a wedge & our academy got that extra boost. We knew he was quality hence the £42m + add ons He didn't seem like he quite fitted in our system, again, imo We replaced him with Doku and we're doing ok. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 52 minutes ago, Kid Dynamite said: Especially with KDB getting on now shhhh, don't say that, it's not true, i refuse to accept that 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 for those that may be interested.... Stefan Borson, @slbsn, on TalkSport with White and Jordan at 10.30 today with a football finance update - Chelsea, hotels, car parks, Everton, Forest, Leicester, new PSR… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30761 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 20 hours ago, OTF said: Not having seen it it sounds more like pointing out that championing a percentage with this many games to play and so many teams and factors involved is rather pointless (but then so is most punditry) as it will change so frequently. I like the statistical analysis from games after the fact, but it needs to be consumed along with the match itself. Not a fan of the win loss draw percentages that they now put up in each match and with each goal scored. It really doesn't add any value. Yeah. I thought it was a bit tongue in cheek and a reference to how one or two results can have a massive impact in the odds at this stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9215 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 He's right, mind. Super computers analyse meteorological systems, they investigate the hidden mysteries within gene sequences, peering at the building blocks of existence. You don't need one for this shit You can forecast probabilities on fucking Excel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 35460 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 20 hours ago, Toonpack said: So let me get this straight, you are comparing the analysis skills of, arguably, the greatest striker this country has ever produced against someone who lives in the spare room playing with spreadsheets, AND coming out on the side of the spreadsheet geek ? Yes. DID I FUCKING STUTTER?! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9215 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Gemmill's read Toonpack's post, and he's had a think, then he's typed out his reply and then bang, he's submitted it. /ShearerPunditry 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20137 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 10 hours ago, Renton said: By that token so are we. yeah, i think we should be thinking about challenging for top 5/6 now, given our run in, our form and the players we have to come back. it may be that chelsea rise as spurs fall away. spurs have some minging fixtures and that palmer kid os on fire for chelsea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9215 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Just now, Dr Gloom said: yeah, i think we should be thinking about challenging for top 5/6 now, given our run in, our form and the players we have to come back. it may be that chelsea rise as spurs fall away. spurs have some minging fixtures and that palmer kid os on fire for chelsea Chelsea and Man Utd are near impossible to gauge. They're getting by on individual talent, but they've got players with loads of it. They can as easily lose to a relegation side as they can take points off a title challenger. They could conceivably lose the next 4 on the bounce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20137 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 8 minutes ago, The Fish said: Chelsea and Man Utd are near impossible to gauge. They're getting by on individual talent, but they've got players with loads of it. They can as easily lose to a relegation side as they can take points off a title challenger. They could conceivably lose the next 4 on the bounce. yup, but they could also win some of them. and their final four all look winnable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 12 minutes ago, The Fish said: Chelsea and Man Utd are near impossible to gauge. They're getting by on individual talent, but they've got players with loads of it. They can as easily lose to a relegation side as they can take points off a title challenger. They could conceivably lose the next 4 on the bounce. i hope so. i'll be at Wembley for their semi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 talksport comparing chelsea hotel with newcastle and related party Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 14892 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 3 minutes ago, LondonBlue said: talksport comparing chelsea hotel with newcastle and related party really? What is it that those bullshitting lickspittle toss rags suggesting that NUFC have sold back to themselves?… 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 2 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: really? What is it that those bullshitting lickspittle toss rags suggesting that NUFC have sold back to themselves?… in short "whats the difference between chelsea selling themselves a hotel and newcastle seeling to saudi clubs" so the suggestion is more that you're hard done by and chelsea getting away with it. of course the chelsea hotels hasn't been approved yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 4 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: really? What is it that those bullshitting lickspittle toss rags suggesting that NUFC have sold back to themselves?… talksport tv link i'm on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 7208 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 3 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: really? What is it that those bullshitting lickspittle toss rags suggesting that NUFC have sold back to themselves?… talking about newcastle selling players to saudi clubs. jordon claiming selling hotels is ok because it's easier to establish fair market value on property. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 7208 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 and another thing.... they've got the terminally stupid, cholesterol drenched man utd supporter on yet again at 11.30. no doubt he'll spend his time polluting the airwaves claiming his entire family were dangerously close to being murdered by social media. the fat cunt. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 567 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 7 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said: and another thing.... they've got the terminally stupid, cholesterol drenched man utd supporter on yet again at 11.30. no doubt he'll spend his time polluting the airwaves claiming his entire family were dangerously close to being murdered by social media. the fat cunt. yeah, once Stefan goes, so do i. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 14892 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 13 minutes ago, LondonBlue said: in short "whats the difference between chelsea selling themselves a hotel and newcastle seeling to saudi clubs" so the suggestion is more that you're hard done by and chelsea getting away with it. of course the chelsea hotels hasn't been approved yet! The premier league member clubs had a vote on it and decided to keep things as they were. Chelsea are using accountancy tricks that there probably isn’t proper rules around. PL closed the long term contract amortisation loophole and they’ll close this eventually . This isn’t a dig, but they closed the inflated sponsorship thing too. It seems they’re always two steps behind the curve… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 35460 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Enjoyed Ten Hag having to tell Garnacho off for liking social media posts slagging the manager off for his treatment of the player. That bloke is on borrowed time there unfortunately. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30761 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Aye, all those players we’ve sold to Saudi clubs with inflated values. I suppose they’re not exactly known for letting the facts get in the way of a story though. Newcastle have dove everything by the book and haven’t even looked to exploit any loopholes so far. There’s the issuing of shares but that’s legit and nothing other clubs haven’t done 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30761 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Just now, Gemmill said: Enjoyed Ten Hag having to tell Garnacho off for liking social media posts slagging the manager off for his treatment of the player. That bloke is on borrowed time there unfortunately. Aye but Southgate replacing him isn’t necessarily an improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 35460 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Just now, Alex said: Aye but Southgate replacing him isn’t necessarily an improvement. Yep, looking forward to the next episode. The players will love Southgate but he seems very limited and hasn't exactly set the world alight in previous club jobs. Done well with England but with an absolutely incredible squad of players with whom he has limited touch points. Nevertheless! Brailsford knows best. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now