Gemmill 53657 Posted yesterday at 05:17 Author Share Posted yesterday at 05:17 8 hours ago, PaddockLad said: Did you and @thebrokendollmake this? It looks like when they gave spiders LSD and observed them making webs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 11070 Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago (edited) 8 hours ago, PaddockLad said: quite comfortably the most concise, self explanatory graphic I've ever seen posted on here. well done pl, if only the desperately needy with their unnecessarily convoluted, gaudy hyperbole could follow suit. Edited 23 hours ago by thebrokendoll 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 20024 Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 58 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Did you and @thebrokendollmake this? It looks like when they gave spiders LSD and observed them making webs. It’s a flow chart. I remember doing them at school. I also suggested about two months ago that we’d get champions league if we won our home games. I haven’t contributed much to this thread because I knew if we won our home games we’d get champions league. Tbh I posted it for the feeble minded who constantly needed to post about something that was arithmetally obvious not long after the cup final, just a bit of clarification for you 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53657 Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago TBD, he's posted it for you, I think. I don't like the term he's using but it's out of my control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 7904 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 10 hours ago, PaddockLad said: And STILL CT won't fancy our chances 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 1091 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago On 19/05/2025 at 18:01, Craig said: The reality is each of the 5 teams HAVE to win on Sunday. Man City - have 2 games Bournemouth (H) & Fulham (A). Neither is straight forward. I'd much rather having points on the board than games in hand Chelsea - have to go to Forest and win. Not straight forward. Villa - have to go to Man Utd and win. Not straight forward. Forest - have to beat Chelsea and hope Villa don't win. Not straight forward. Newcastle - have to beat Everton at home. Surely the easier ask of any of the 5 teams. thanks to last night i think 4 teams need to win and city need to draw. whether that helps city or not time will tell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 24568 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 13 minutes ago, LondonBlue said: thanks to last night i think 4 teams need to win and city need to draw. whether that helps city or not time will tell who have you got - fulham away? can't see you losing there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 7904 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 16 minutes ago, LondonBlue said: thanks to last night i think 4 teams need to win and city need to draw. whether that helps city or not time will tell A point is surely enough for you. It leaves a possibility of Man City, Newcastle, Chelsea & Villa all ending on 69 points, but Villa would need to win by 18 goals! Not even Man Utd are that shit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 3783 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 12 hours ago, PaddockLad said: That's an interesting prediction. Let's see if it all comes true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 11070 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago oy @Gemmill, look at this for a chart, eat your fucking heart out and weep..... 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53657 Posted 18 hours ago Author Share Posted 18 hours ago 37 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said: oy @Gemmill, look at this for a chart, eat your fucking heart out and weep..... Can you explain the Chelsea/Forest column please? When it says W and L who's winning and who's losing, cos they can't both do it. I MEAN FOR FUCKS SAKE. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 12438 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Can you explain the Chelsea/Forest column please? When it says W and L who's winning and who's losing, cos they can't both do it. I MEAN FOR FUCKS SAKE. Careful TBD this fuckers on the verge of getting his lass' red marker pen out. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 11070 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Can you explain the Chelsea/Forest column please? When it says W and L who's winning and who's losing, cos they can't both do it. I MEAN FOR FUCKS SAKE. simpleton. the outcome would apply to either team, being as they play each other. being embarrassingly pernickety doesn't make you look clever, just a cunt. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 7904 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Toonpack said: Careful TBD this fuckers on the verge of getting his lass' red marker pen out. Euphemism? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53657 Posted 17 hours ago Author Share Posted 17 hours ago 27 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said: simpleton. the outcome would apply to either team, being as they play each other. being embarrassingly pernickety doesn't make you look clever, just a cunt. Poor presentation. Very poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 4452 Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 3 hours ago, thebrokendoll said: oy @Gemmill, look at this for a chart, eat your fucking heart out and weep..... That looks more like a table than a chart 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 6673 Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Not only are we completing data/probability visualisation pieces of Newcastle's chances, but now also a critical review of said data presentation methodologies. I've seen less scrutiny in academic journals Remember to call out your innate bias and areas in which further research could be done lads. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 5698 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 9 hours ago, thebrokendoll said: simpleton. the outcome would apply to either team, being as they play each other. being embarrassingly pernickety doesn't make you look clever, just a cunt. Does that not mean 9 rows of your table are redundant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBass 3219 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Andrew said: Does that not mean 9 rows of your table are redundant? Aye, the ‘W’ should be ‘W/L’ and the ‘L’s can be removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 53657 Posted 8 hours ago Author Share Posted 8 hours ago What a day for tbd. Turned up with his knackers in a wheelbarrow, waving his "chart" about, and he's leaving with his bollocks well and truly flicked to within an inch of themselves. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 34774 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Someone has been reading up. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 11070 Posted 40 minutes ago Share Posted 40 minutes ago 8 hours ago, Andrew said: Does that not mean 9 rows of your table are redundant? I've no idea in all honesty mate, I stole it off n.o. and never gave it much more than a cursory glance. bit like the ones gemmill chucks up on here. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now