ajax_andy

Nice one mate that would be much appreciated

Would prefer not to get a newly born pup as we both work, so one 6 months or older would be best. I would still come home at lunch time to let it out etc, but don't want to leave a newly born pup alone for 4 hours at a time.

Bit of a long shot I know, but does anyone have, or know someone with a Labrador puppy they are looking to home? Ideally it'd be 6 months to a year old, but would consider a younger pup. Cheers Andy

Lovely pic... nice post processing of an already strong image too. Strong image and good contrast

Illuminati shizzle and a break away movement to end the silent tyranny that reigns upon the unsuspecting masses... or something along those lines.

Can't confirm it of course, but it looks good. An absolute massive amount of data has been hitting the Parky radar for a number of weeks...Mankind is moving to the edge of a big moments. * Reg the Annunaki it has been mistranslated and passed down incorrectly and we are aware it is misinformation: The Annunaki thing is completely made up. Anu (even going back to Sumer, Baylonian texts and later Egyptian) means spirit or a spirit guide, not a literal being at all. It is the moment when the 'earth meets the sky.' The 'Anu' guide you through the 'Book of the dead' and so on... Don't trust anybody who bangs on about the Annunaki as 7ft beings who has us as slaves and so on...Misinformation. The elite are losing control of the planet as we speak. Insider testiomony recently revealed that some key members have split from the ruling group and their is a power play going on right now. The insider predicted the first result of this would be seen in the Middles east and then China. yeah like I said about the Annunaki it depends on who you believe... Sitchin for me is full of bollocks but he does have his supporters out there. Sitchin is a stooge for the ruling elite. It's psyops in the sense that we are not in control of our past and were slaves and so on...Rubbish. Stooge or no stooge he has no background in ancient Sumerian, whilst anyone who does states that he's wrong... still has his believers though and made a fair old mint before he died i'm sure. Tbh I dont believe in his translations at all... but I do quite like the concept

I didnt. He just encapsulated nincely my "straw man argument" Ricky Gervais is attacking religion....oh it must be cool and intelligent, lets do the same shall we....ooh Oh look its Charlie Brooker, hes great in the guardian ha ha hes so funny. People try to look like free thinkers and end up looking like sheep. The problem is that you are stating or rather implying that all people who dont believe in religion are influenced by the likes of Ricky Gervais and Charlie Brooker. I myself dont believe in religion, but its got nothing to do with popular culture, its to do with my unease that the so called "men of god" abuse children, and that religion causes wars... how is that a "godly" way of life? In fact a lot of athiests probably lead a much more "devine" lifestyle than those who are religious. Religion also flies in the face of facts... "you must believe" they say... why must I believe? Especially when all the evidence points to that belief being completely wrong? Dont get me wrong I actually believe in forces at work that we can't explain... I dont believe them to be "devine" as such, but I do believe in spirituality and some sort of eternal plain which we ascend to. However religion is massively outdated and doesnt reflect society as it is now... it contradicts that which is known to be correct and implies that it's right regardless... and that isnt really a solid foundation for me to live my life by. Science also has its own problems, but again thats a completely different argument I am talking about those who actively attack my faith, not those who choose to believe something different. Fair enough, but you are debating on a thread to do with UFO's/Aliens which by religious definitions should surely make the extistance of such impossible or highly unlikely? Are they god's children too?

Can't confirm it of course, but it looks good. An absolute massive amount of data has been hitting the Parky radar for a number of weeks...Mankind is moving to the edge of a big moments. * Reg the Annunaki it has been mistranslated and passed down incorrectly and we are aware it is misinformation: The Annunaki thing is completely made up. Anu (even going back to Sumer, Baylonian texts and later Egyptian) means spirit or a spirit guide, not a literal being at all. It is the moment when the 'earth meets the sky.' The 'Anu' guide you through the 'Book of the dead' and so on... Don't trust anybody who bangs on about the Annunaki as 7ft beings who has us as slaves and so on...Misinformation. The elite are losing control of the planet as we speak. Insider testiomony recently revealed that some key members have split from the ruling group and their is a power play going on right now. The insider predicted the first result of this would be seen in the Middles east and then China. yeah like I said about the Annunaki it depends on who you believe... Sitchin for me is full of bollocks but he does have his supporters out there.

I dont think anyone (certainly not me) is equating paedophiles with catholic priests as a whole... it is however an example of those supposedly closest to god commiting haneous crimes against another human being. If there had been lots of priests murdering prostitues i'd have used that as part of may argument... its not a dig at Catholic Priests, its just a nod towards something that doesnt add up in the grand scheme of religion

They're as diametrically opposed as any two things can be - no amount of apologist twisting can change that. Wrong. The problem, at rock bottom, is this: If nothing happens without a cause, then something must have caused the universe to appear. But then we are faced with the inevitable question of what caused that something. And so on in an infinite regress. Some people simply proclaim that God created the universe, but children always want to know who created God, and that line of questioning gets uncomfortably difficult. One evasive tactic is to claim that the universe didn't have a beginning, that it has existed for all eternity. Unfortunately, there are many scientific reasons why this obvious idea is unsound. For starters, given an infinite amount of time, anything that can happen will already have happened, for if a physical process is likely to occur with a certain nonzero probability-however small-then given an infinite amount of time the process must occur, with probability one. By now, the universe should have reached some sort of final state in which all possible physical processes have run their course. Furthermore, you don't explain the existence of the universe by asserting that it has always existed. That is rather like saying that nobody wrote the Bible: it was. just copied from earlier versions. Quite apart from all this, there is very good evidence that the universe did come into existence in a big bang, about fifteen billion years ago. The effects of that primeval explosion are clearly detectable today-in the fact that the universe is still expanding, and is filled with an afterglow of radiant heat. So if nothing happens without a cause, what caused the beginning of the universe? Surely as it defies the laws of physics, it is by definition something devine, wouldnt you say? Goal post moving shite as usual. The vast majority of Theists don't know, understand or believe in a 14bn year old universe. Everything they do actually believe in has been proven to be wrong beyond ny kind of doubt. It's only since the big bang has been theorised that philosophical bullshit like that has been invented. I actually admire the honesty of Creationists more than the twisting insanity of people like you. As I said in my first post, it depends how you define g-d. I think the problem is that mans stupidity over the years has made the whole idea seem ridiculous...of course it is the same popular culture that built religion to be a grey haired man in the sky, that is now seeking to break it down. I find it similar to the "ROONEY IS THE BEST PLAYER IN THE WORLD / ROONEY IS CRAP" rubbish you read in the tabloids whenever he is going through whatever run of form he is in at the time. Popular consciousness. Sheep thinking. I'm sorry but the only thing you've posted so far that has really any validity is the thing you cut and pasted Mans stupidity has lead him to attempt to discover what creates life, sustains it, and ultimately destroys it, its also lead him to try and crack the codes of space travel and the universe itself...is that really stupidity? No its not... its about trying to understand the basicc questions of why and how are we here. In the process we've discovered that most of what is written in religion is bollocks or is really stretching the truth... its nothing to do with popular culture or being stupid... its about a thirst for discovery and understanding... two traits that laugh in the face of stupidity. Comparing Rooney to god is nonsensical btw and really pointless.

I didnt. He just encapsulated nincely my "straw man argument" Ricky Gervais is attacking religion....oh it must be cool and intelligent, lets do the same shall we....ooh Oh look its Charlie Brooker, hes great in the guardian ha ha hes so funny. People try to look like free thinkers and end up looking like sheep. The problem is that you are stating or rather implying that all people who dont believe in religion are influenced by the likes of Ricky Gervais and Charlie Brooker. I myself dont believe in religion, but its got nothing to do with popular culture, its to do with my unease that the so called "men of god" abuse children, and that religion causes wars... how is that a "godly" way of life? In fact a lot of athiests probably lead a much more "devine" lifestyle than those who are religious. Religion also flies in the face of facts... "you must believe" they say... why must I believe? Especially when all the evidence points to that belief being completely wrong? Dont get me wrong I actually believe in forces at work that we can't explain... I dont believe them to be "devine" as such, but I do believe in spirituality and some sort of eternal plain which we ascend to. However religion is massively outdated and doesnt reflect society as it is now... it contradicts that which is known to be correct and implies that it's right regardless... and that isnt really a solid foundation for me to live my life by. Science also has its own problems, but again thats a completely different argument

They're as diametrically opposed as any two things can be - no amount of apologist twisting can change that. Wrong. The problem, at rock bottom, is this: If nothing happens without a cause, then something must have caused the universe to appear. But then we are faced with the inevitable question of what caused that something. And so on in an infinite regress. Some people simply proclaim that God created the universe, but children always want to know who created God, and that line of questioning gets uncomfortably difficult. One evasive tactic is to claim that the universe didn't have a beginning, that it has existed for all eternity. Unfortunately, there are many scientific reasons why this obvious idea is unsound. For starters, given an infinite amount of time, anything that can happen will already have happened, for if a physical process is likely to occur with a certain nonzero probability-however small-then given an infinite amount of time the process must occur, with probability one. By now, the universe should have reached some sort of final state in which all possible physical processes have run their course. Furthermore, you don't explain the existence of the universe by asserting that it has always existed. That is rather like saying that nobody wrote the Bible: it was. just copied from earlier versions. Quite apart from all this, there is very good evidence that the universe did come into existence in a big bang, about fifteen billion years ago. The effects of that primeval explosion are clearly detectable today-in the fact that the universe is still expanding, and is filled with an afterglow of radiant heat. So if nothing happens without a cause, what caused the beginning of the universe? Surely as it defies the laws of physics, it is by definition something devine, wouldnt you say? Unfortunately its an impossible question to answer... especially as no-one even understands the universe as it is now (electric universe being the new idea), let alone how it began, what came before it (if anything) etc etc Yes people can theorise that it has always been there, or that it was created by a devine being... or that it doesnt even exist (holographic universe theory), and that we dont exist... to suggest it as "devine" is just a thoery, and as valid as any other, but ultimately is also impossible to prove or even really comprehend as being any more correct than any other theory.

Erm or this which kind of sums up what I said but in one line lol

Also amusing all the conspiricy theorists that will believe it is signs of aliens whilst dismissing rational arguments. Its a fake BTW. There is no proof of aliens, most if not all pics & videos are fakes or mis-identifications. If there are weird craft flying around in our skies there's a fair chance most if not all are human created and secret projects. However despite all that it still makes a whole lot more sense that there's such things as "aliens" over "god(s)" Depends how you define g-d doesnt it? Its common amongst atheists to believe religion and science are at odds, nothing could be further from the truth.....but its trendy to laugh at religious types whilst believing beyond all doubt (and against scientific proof) that 9-11 was an inside job. People trying to look intelligent innit. Well if you look at the theory of creation over evolution then yes they are at odds with each other... they couldn't be more at odds if they tried. I define "gods" as those specified in the specific religious texts they belong too... how else could you define them? I actually think its best to look at all the "evidence" available and make an informed opinion... there is no solid evidence available to the likes of you and I to suggest either Aliens or Gods exist... however as our understanding of life on this and potentially other planets increases, the odds of one being possible increases and the other decreases. 911 has nothing to do with this subject, but to dismiss the possibility of it being anything other than "terrorists" smacks of a very narrow view point. Again there's no solid evidence available to the likes of you and I, so you have to look at all the circumstantial evidence for both sides... neither adds up and therefore its impossible to have a definitive answer for either side... however there is no "scientific proof" as you state that either side of that argument is correct. But like i said that really has nothing to do with this thread and could be debated all day long in its own thread. To throw 911 in here is just someone with a narrow view point on anything "conspiracy" trying to cast everyone who believes in one thing as part of the "tin foil hat brigade"... which like I said shows a very narrow point of view and an inability to debate the subject matter correctly

Also amusing all the conspiricy theorists that will believe it is signs of aliens whilst dismissing rational arguments. Its a fake BTW. There is no proof of aliens, most if not all pics & videos are fakes or mis-identifications. If there are weird craft flying around in our skies there's a fair chance most if not all are human created and secret projects. However despite all that it still makes a whole lot more sense that there's such things as "aliens" over "god(s)"

Very true! Also pretty much all religions believe in the same events happening (big flood that wiped out most of the earth etc) they just explain it in different ways. Basically they pretty much all stem back to the same events happening in the past though... kind of makes religious wars a bit ridiculous when you think about it (not that they arent even if you dont think about it, and most religious wars are nothing to do with religion anyway) They all talk about powerful beings descending from the skies and changing humanity... I think i'd be more inclined to believe those beings were aliens than "gods", although it could be argued that if aliens manipulated our DNA or even created us that they are actually "gods" by definition.

All of the Muslim world is related to ancient religion. Iraq was home to the sumerians who are believed to be the oldest civilization to have been on earth... depending on who you believe their ancient texts depict visitors from outer space called the Annunaki who set up religion, civilization etc Also Jerusalim is home to "the son of god"... an all powerful being who descended from the skies blah blah blah. Some people may argue that "gods" are just powerful beings that traverse the universe and come down to our planet... i.e aliens. So it would be logical to presume that "Aliens" would be be more likely to visit the muslim world as this is their "habitual home" on this planet so to speak. The Jews have some vague claim on the place as well I think. Haha yeah thats true... justa vague one tho like u said ;-)

All of the Muslim world is related to ancient religion. Iraq was home to the sumerians who are believed to be the oldest civilization to have been on earth... depending on who you believe their ancient texts depict visitors from outer space called the Annunaki who set up religion, civilization etc Also Jerusalim is home to "the son of god"... an all powerful being who descended from the skies blah blah blah. Some people may argue that "gods" are just powerful beings that traverse the universe and come down to our planet... i.e aliens. So it would be logical to presume that "Aliens" would be be more likely to visit the muslim world as this is their "habitual home" on this planet so to speak.

Get yerself to Nice. Lovely and cheap from newcastle with easy yet. Loads of culture, fabulous beaches, great transport system with St Tropex etc to the right and Monte Carlo to the left. Yep sounds pretty good tbh... will look in to it this week I think.... just found out 10% of staff at my work are getting laid off so might have to wait to book anything to see if i'm getting the axe or not. Bad times!

Everywhere in the Northern hemisphere that is 'hot' is likely to be hot in August. I'm not great in heat but have found the Costa del Sol to be OK as you tend to get sea breezes. Only been in May or September though. There's a nice resort about 50 mile east og Malaga called Nerja which is worth seeing, and Marbella is canny nice despite its rep. Not much culture though. What about Barcelona? Or Nice in cote d'azure (direct Easy Jet flights). The latter will be expensive though. Nice might be a good shout actually... will have a look in to it so cheers for that. Been to Barcelona last year for my stag do... love the place but think i'd rather go for a few days rather than a full 2 weeks. Cracking place tho... especially when you get to go to the Nou Camp and watch Barca lift the title

Was thinking of Andalucia but been warned its ridiculously hot in August when we're planning on going. Anyone got any suggestions? Want a bit of culture but also a nice beech to relax and unwind on. Needs to be fairly easy to get too... i.e. not 14 hour flights and then a huge journey at the other end Somewhere thats a decent 30 degrees but no more would be nice.

Very cute! My dog died last week... she was 14 so had a good innings. Will be looking at chocolate lab pups in a few months time to fill the void.

Is it possible to view something x number of light years away if you are travelling at the speed of light? Wouldn't the sheer speed which you were travelling distort any image so much that it would be impossible to see anything? We dont see images, but process light reflecting off objects, this information travels to us at the speed of light. So you would have to travel faster than the speed of light to distort a relative position. Ahh ok I didnt know that

To travel at the speed of light you'd need some sort of ship that was in some sort of "bubble" where the laws of physics didnt apply... thus protecting your body from the forces of gravity etc. I'm pretty sure this has been proposed as being (in theory) possible by scientists