Renton

Is that a Boro fan listening to Pigbag?

I was hoping for an answer at last there, as LM was replying to this thread, but now he's pissed off again. Tell you what Leazes, don't bother. After asking you 10 times now and you refusing to answer, I'm sure people can make their own minds up.

Jesus wept what a complete joke you are. For the third time, what post are you talking about? Tell me the thread and post number and I'll read it. And for the ninth time, are you a supporter of the BNP or not - yes or no? If you don't want me to make assumptions just answer this! Btw, just because it appears you are too thick to realise what the point was when me and others stated what we studied at Uni, it was in response to you claiming our view points had come from "fancy Dan" lecturers, which was patent nonsense, as for the most part we didn't study humanities or politics (not that that should matter). Now, just answer the question, please. Or do you think I'll stop asking it? Because I won't. 147442[/snapback] typical response of a clever left winger, as I've said. "Im more intelligent than you, you can't disagree with me. Boo Hoo". I have answered your silly question 4 times now, you are obviously too thick to understand a reply. So I can only say, I am glad I don't have the "qualifications" you have...because they are obviously worthless. What a pompous prick you are !!! Why don't you make an intelligent reply to the point in the other thread about Hamza ? Have you read it yet ......... 147459[/snapback] Tenth and last time Leazes, are you a supporter of the BNP? Yes or no? If you have answered this question 4 times already, direct me to one of them by thread name and post number, because I must have missed it.

You're right Spongebob. I don't want any more contact with LM, I was just trying to get him to admit what he really is before I called time. His refusal to answer this question though answers it anyway I guess, and I'm sure it is clear to everyone who has read these threads what his character is. I really like 90% of the people on this board, even when I disagree. I guess it's inevitable your going to get the odd unpleasent character though, and I shouldn't let it get to me. Leazes Mag is a joke. But any joke pretty soon becomes unfunny when it is told several times, which is where we are now with him. Gardening advice is needed indeed.

Jesus wept what a complete joke you are. For the third time, what post are you talking about? Tell me the thread and post number and I'll read it. And for the ninth time, are you a supporter of the BNP or not - yes or no? If you don't want me to make assumptions just answer this! Btw, just because it appears you are too thick to realise what the point was when me and others stated what we studied at Uni, it was in response to you claiming our view points had come from "fancy Dan" lecturers, which was patent nonsense, as for the most part we didn't study humanities or politics (not that that should matter). Now, just answer the question, please. Or do you think I'll stop asking it? Because I won't.

Never finished above eighth, pub leagues aside. 147372[/snapback] Never had any money to work with. I don't think you will find many Leicester fans complaining about their league positions under him.

what ? Warmonger George ? What about him being a martyr ? What about the proof that he was a terrorist killer ? What would you have done to him, if he had turned up at Dover claiming asylum ? 146750[/snapback] He was a known terrorist and mass murderer Leazes. I doubt any person on this board would have a problem in his assassination. Remember in the previous thread, the only post you agreed with me on was that Hussein should have been taken out 20 years ago? So why are you surprised by my response? Btw, that word in bold is a pretty crucial point I think. Are you going to answer my final post on the other thread now? 146753[/snapback] Abu Hamza was a known to be involved in terrorism. What was your stance on him being free for a long time ? 146830[/snapback] My stance is enough evidence was gathered to put him on trial and he was then arrested, and rightly so. My stance is I back the authorities on this, whatever Leazes Mag states. What's your stance? Bit of an odd question if you ask me. 146835[/snapback] He was arrested, but it was years too late. While he was free, his mosque preached hatred, stored arms and trained bombers. Do you really think this is desirable ? 147078[/snapback] Well whatever, I don't know the ins and outs of it, or why he wasn't arrested sooner. Was it not because he was under surveillance? Sometimes you can get a better result if you observe a known terrorist or terrorist sympathiser, rather than go straight in and risk a failed conviction? Pretty sure this is what happened in Northern Ireland. Regardless, Leazes will be on here later saying that if I had my way I give him a grant and pat him on the back or something equally inane........ 147087[/snapback] http://www.al-bab.com/yemen/hamza/hamza1.htm you said that a known terrorist would be detained. Hamza was a known terrorist for many years, and wasn't detained. So you were talking out of your arse mate. It is obvious that this only happened because they were not able to legally charge him, even though he was known , which means our laws are inadequate. To say differently is obviously talking out of your arse again. He also claimed everything our benefits system allowed during that time. Rather than admit you are wrong, you say 'well whatever'. 147177[/snapback] I see there is a real rush to respond to this one 147338[/snapback] My internet connection was down - have you answered if you are a supporter of the BNP yet - this is the eighth time I've asked you now - yes or no? Tyne Bridge, I don't know much about the background of Abu Hamza, but I'd think there was a bit of a difference between him, being kept under surveillance in London, and this Zarquawi person, who was roaming the streets of Iraq, actively killing people. I'd imagine the army got some information which they had to act on then and there, and took the opportunity to take him out, which I applaud. If you can't see the difference though, then that's your problem. Perhaps you think this is a hypocritical stance? Well if you do, your problem is with the government and legal system with this country, not me. Personally though, I don't have a problem with how Hamza has been dealt with, and I think keeping him under surveillance might have yielded some important information about terrorists, although this is specualtion, I admit. Nice insults in what was a civil conversation btw, well done.

No response from Leazes either - what a surprise. Didn't get an answer to my question either. It's ironic that Leazes thinks people assume things about him - you haven't got much option when he refuses to answer a simple yes/no question.

Who was he forced to sell? The only decent player I can think of that left was Lampard but that was at the start of Roeder's time as caretaker. 147135[/snapback] I thought the firesale happened after they were relegated like. I'd be honest enough to say I don't know a great deal about West Ham and what went wrong that year, but it is a fact he got a fairly talented team relegated. And that he did this at Watford. And almost did at Gillingham. That can't be all down to bad luck and poor chairmanship, and I doubt it would happen to a truely talented manager like O'Neill (imo). I hope of course that Roeder can prove doubters like myself wrong, I really do. But at the same time I find it pretty strange that people can forget about his past so readily, and convince themselves he is a top class manager after 20 games or whatever for us. The single most important position of employment at any club is the manager's post. We went for the cheap, easy option, and employed a man who has failed at all his previous clubs - that's the bottom line. We may regret it.

Freddie buys the players, so this doesnt really matter 147029[/snapback] Aye, there is no point in having a manager then. Roeder has never managed a club that has been able to buy top class players so I can't imagine what fans you have been talking to mate. I hope they have some money, as Faye is crap, Clark is finished which only leaves Emre and Parker, and Butt. 147082[/snapback] I assume you're referring to me and I mean West Ham ones. He spent quite a bit there iirc. And I doubt he'll have much to spend here this year at least, unless he proves shrewd in the transfer market, which he hasn't really done before. But maybe this time it will be different, I don't know. You said earlier that not getting O'Neill was no great loss, and it was pointed out that O'Neill hasn't failed anywhere he's been at, whereas Roeder has - 3 times (and every time) in fact. Given their respective managerial records, are you seriously saying you'd rather have Roeder than O'Neill, because that's how it's coming across to me.

Need to log in to get on the parsnip, for some strange reason.

what ? Warmonger George ? What about him being a martyr ? What about the proof that he was a terrorist killer ? What would you have done to him, if he had turned up at Dover claiming asylum ? 146750[/snapback] He was a known terrorist and mass murderer Leazes. I doubt any person on this board would have a problem in his assassination. Remember in the previous thread, the only post you agreed with me on was that Hussein should have been taken out 20 years ago? So why are you surprised by my response? Btw, that word in bold is a pretty crucial point I think. Are you going to answer my final post on the other thread now? 146753[/snapback] Abu Hamza was a known to be involved in terrorism. What was your stance on him being free for a long time ? 146830[/snapback] My stance is enough evidence was gathered to put him on trial and he was then arrested, and rightly so. My stance is I back the authorities on this, whatever Leazes Mag states. What's your stance? Bit of an odd question if you ask me. 146835[/snapback] He was arrested, but it was years too late. While he was free, his mosque preached hatred, stored arms and trained bombers. Do you really think this is desirable ? 147078[/snapback] Well whatever, I don't know the ins and outs of it, or why he wasn't arrested sooner. Was it not because he was under surveillance? Sometimes you can get a better result if you observe a known terrorist or terrorist sympathiser, rather than go straight in and risk a failed conviction? Pretty sure this is what happened in Northern Ireland. Regardless, Leazes will be on here later saying that if I had my way I give him a grant and pat him on the back or something equally inane........

Freddie buys the players, so this doesnt really matter 147029[/snapback] Only the ones that have proved successful with hindsight is what I heard.

Looks like he's pissed off again without answering. Does anyone know what post he's talking about btw?

your training should come in handy when you are mopping up after the next explosion, that you are waiting to happen. Shame you haven't got the common sense, to understand that prevention and attempting to tackle the problem is the best cure. Unless, of course, you are one of the victims. Still, just so long as we have a terrorist or two roaming around the country, Renton will defend his "rights". Because he is "educated" in medicine you know, and so understands how the security of the country works. Have you read my other post yet, the one you keep asking about ? 146974[/snapback] I've asked you to point it out by the number - the one that's on the top right of the post, then I'll read it. Does it answer if you support the BNP or not though? Otherwise frankly I can't be arsed to read it tbh. Would it not be easier to say yes or no now? Seventh time of asking that is, btw.

Am I right in thinking no windows open = no maggots? That's got to be a blessing.

Profound.

So we're short everywhere, and Roeder has his work cut out. Talking to fans of other clubs, one of his weakest points as a manager seems to be buying top class players, and of course he does not have a big profile, so this is a worry, to me at least.

I thought you were serious for a second.

Agreed. But the people are twats - the least friendly I have seen out of Paris (!), London, Milan, Barcelona, Cannes etc. Maybe I was unlucky but I won't be returning. Plus, architecturally it was pretty much destroyed in the second world war. Some of the ruins they preserved are interesting though.

I recommend Complicity - a cracking read I thought. I hardly ever read any more unfortunately, since I gave up public transport. When I do (on holiday), I tend to stick to autobiographies. Must try harder I guess, and spend less time wasting my time on stuff like this.

I went last year and thought it was a bit shit personally. Sorry if that doesn't help much.

I'm pretty sure none of that has crossed his mind.

Damn.

Leazes obviously has a huge chip on his shoulder about education, I can only assume he went to a rough school in the west end and left with no qualifications, and is bitter about it. Whoops, me and my assumptions again. 146839[/snapback] He's got GCSE in domestic science for his curries. 146877[/snapback] CSE you mean.