Renton

Have you been whooshed? Shirley not!

But I wouldn't stop at punching him.

Dame Judy Dench?

Your viewpoints on anything are worthless to LM apparently, because of your viewpoints on Bellamy. Another stunning incite into how LM's mind works.

Suggest you look at Bridgets and PL's posts that I agreed with PP. They prove I read posts. When they talk sense, they get a sensible reply. 149259[/snapback] That answer proves my point though, all you've done there is refer to to two posts where you replied sensibly to a post you agreed with, what Im saying is you appear to skim, see theyre not backing you up (regardless of what stance they are taking) and automatically spout the abuse, NOTHING in any post of SLPs has he taken a left wing stance but he got the abuse thrown his way. 149270[/snapback] PP, if he calls me a "racialist" .... am I not entitled to call him back ? And - he is the one who said "there is no middle ground", so he's either a "right wing racialist" or a "left wing do gooder". He implied it himself. If YOU read the post properly mate, you'll see that. If I thought for a moment he was up for a proper debate, I would have replied that there is of course middle ground, there is always middle ground in any view. 149277[/snapback] If its justified then yes, course you can however you would have had to had a total humour bypass to have read that post as anything other than a pisstake. For fucks sake he ends it with "all hail emperor Meenzer" or sumit. 149282[/snapback] I've tried to resist biting on this, but enough. Having a medical qualification makes you no more or less qualified to comment on the subjects in this thread. However your continued insinuations that having a medical degree actually makes you more stupid are ridiculous beyond belief. If this is what you believe then I can only hope that any medical attention you recieve in the future is from people as dim as you assume them to be, as you don't really deserve anything else. 149445[/snapback] As I've said before, how do you know anything about me ? You shouldn't make assumptions. I would say that someone who has an understanding of a subject, lets say defence and security, has as much understanding of medical matters as someone who has an understanding of medical matters has of defence and security. So - why does Renton insist he knows all about defence and security ? Have I, for instance, insisted I know about medical matters ? I wouldn't do that, because I don't. Is that a difficult concept ? 149531[/snapback] I explained that I understood that concept in my post. It's higlighted in bold. What I took issue with was your consistent insinuations that not only did a medical qualification not help you understand defence issues, but possessing one actually inhibited your ability to come to grips with it. Which is bollocks. 149542[/snapback] As I have said at least three times now, the subject of education came up precisely because me, Alex, and Rikko (I think) thought they were irrelevant to this debate at hand. Yet despite this, Leazes still obsesses about them. Basically he's a sad case who can't understand the simplest of concepts. Any discussions with him are completely pointless as a result; it took me a while to appreciate this, but it will become obvious to nearly everyone in time. My suggestion is to just put him on ignore - at least that way you don't feel you have to respond to his pointless digs, lies and misinterpretations.

Thers also the fact that its always used as a jokey kind of word in an Alan Partridge style as when he called that bloke a "Bloody Mentalist". And the rest of SLP's post makes it blatantly clear he's having a luagh! I didn't know racialist was a proper accepted term meaning the same as racist though, so after 25 pages this thread has finally come up with a bit of almost useful information 149222[/snapback] to make a distinction. I would say that "racist" is a theoretical word used by theorists, who believe that race determines characteristics, whereas a "racialist" is someone who believes in race supremacy. Whatever. Racist is the most commonly used expression, Whereas someone who uses the word "racialist" instead, reminds me of when Chris Waddle used to come on TV and talk about someone getting a "pelanty". And the stupid mackem idiot thought he was being clever. So I place SLP's use of the word "racialist" in the bracket of a stupid mackem, or a stupid child, getting the expression incorrect, and he thought he was being clever. Either that or his use of language is poor, and he's just thick. Or maybe just not clever, like Renton. Not that I'm bothered like. EDIT. I see Alex hasn't bothered to answer Pilchard Chops yet either. What a surprise. 149257[/snapback] You blatantly just looked that up as you clearly didn't even know it was a word when you had a pop at SLP Oh and I'm not responding to Pilchard Chops as I feel my attack on him was unfair and I have no desire to escalate our minor disagreement (unlike yourself, unsurprisingly). 149497[/snapback] I see LM is still obsessing about me then. That's quite an inferiority complex he's got there.

Not to kick over a hornets nest, but there's one thing I have to ask in regard to this answer Renton. Is it feasible to expect the person with his finger on the trigger to be entriely certain that the person in his sights is absolutely the right person? Intelligence, such as it is, leaves a lot to be desired and while innocent lives should not be lost, is it actually possible to be a hundred percent certain that you've got the right guy? I agree that simply popping everyone with a beard and a backpack is rediculous, but honestly, it is unimaginably difficult to get sufficient information on a target without them becoming aware and disappearing or, even worse, accelerating whatever plans they have... I think you're shoot to kill but only if you're sure is un-workable in this current clime 149444[/snapback] Give me a break GF, I was merely trying to be succinct for the purposes of Peasepud's questions. I'm perfectly aware that the police or army have a difficult job - I've said so several times on this thread alone, and really can't be bothered to repeat myself constantly.

The new pope's considerably worse like. And I bet Primal Scream aren't as good as the Jesus and Mary Chain nowadays....

Hope this helps, but bare in mind I literally don't want to be exposed to anything Leazes says from now on - having him on ignore actually really does make this a better board imo.

Daley Thompson was white as a KKK gown freshly washed with Daz on the speccy. Only posh kids had C64s.

Apple Ie? Sounds Fancy Dan to me - no monochromatic graphics there. This is what you want.

That's frpm some fancy Dan console, not a humble spectrum. On the Spectrum, Cookie was the best ever food based game : FACT SQUARED.

Why, might I ask? 149090[/snapback] The picture Meenzer posted reminds me of one of the levels. 149092[/snapback] Ah, it reminded me of Jet Set Willy. Mr Wimpy was OK at the time I thought - what could be better than making 20 foot burgers whilst being chased up and down ladders by ingredients?

Good post I thought.

Why, might I ask?

I have a cellar instead. 149049[/snapback] I have a utility room.

A larder's a lah-di-dah pantry tbh.

You need an unlocked phone as far as I know.

Insignificant compared to the cost of the raid I suspect.

Finally Renton comes clean with the truth. Leazes has been vindicated. 148845[/snapback] I've noticed you've been conspicuous by your absence like. Any tips? 148847[/snapback] In what regard? If you mean how to handle Leazes, I've been advising from about page 3 that you stop replying to him before it gets out of hand. It's now out of hand. 148849[/snapback] Ah. Fair enough.

Finally Renton comes clean with the truth. Leazes has been vindicated. 148845[/snapback] I've noticed you've been conspicuous by your absence like. Any tips?

It's difficult to know how to react when someone's being so bloody-minded, particularly since he's admitted that he wants your bottom. I'm actually a bit jealous. 148842[/snapback]

Seriously though, given the fact that Leazes has been writing all sorts of lies specifically about me for a week now (I think I'm intelligent, I think my qualifications make me superior in this debate, I welcome terrorists etc etc), as have been picked up on by Meenzer btw, how am I supposed to react? How would other people have handled it? Interested to know, from anyone else but Leazes, obviously.

Just for the record Renton, I think you're a thick pompous twat, a do gooder left winger, completely clueless and I really don't give a flying fuck what your "medical qualification" is, nor your hypocrisy in assuming things of others, yet say intelligent people shouldn't do such things. You might have a "medical qualification" but you certainly know fuck all about security of the UK. Only a complete wanker would think such things have a connection, other than being a medical man having a bomb going off may give you something to do, which is probably why you said we would have to accept these things happening. In short, a wanker of the first degree. Your attitude you showed towards HTL in bringing up a child abuse comment led to a similar "argument" with him...funny how its always someone else isn't it ? Flounce off like a big bairn, again, just because someone disagrees with your naive theories. What an arsehole. Ironic you are complaining - again - about "spreading lies" but it's OK for you to spread lies. Don't dish it out if you can't take it. Double wanker. What is ironic about me agreeing with Bridget last night ? Why don't you answer, or is it just a stupid comment that you haven't a clue and don't even know what you meant yourself ? I think debating with you is a waste of time, and you should fuck off. tbh.... 148684[/snapback] Right, my final response to you then. Firstly, the relevance of my comment last night was that in my opinion, you were solely agreeing with Bridget because she was disagreeing with me. This, I though, was ironic, as I cannot think of a single board member who is more opposed to your thick nazi tendencies than Bridget. As I don't want to talk for her on this issue, I'll leave it there. However, at least I have answered this now, unlike you (see my sig, which I shortly will be removing when I put you on ignore) There you go again, a supposedly intelligent man, making assumptions and jumping to conclusions, patronising and insulting. Shame to say it again Renton, but I think someone of your hypocrisy, and left wing do gooder tendencies is clearly a thick deluded twat. You brought up your "qualifications". I think your persistent references to "thick" along with this does nothing other than prove your insecurity of your opinions. I will settle for saying you are clueless about security measures in the UK. insults flying thick ! and fast now. Tut tut. Not very intelligent is it ? I quite like proving you wrong. I see you are assuming things again. So intelligent, what a shame you make such silly statements. Waste of a good brain, obviously. Nice to see, that when it boils down to it, you swear just like anyone - not good at all Renton, doesn't fit your image One thing you should learn matey, is not to throw out insults when you can't take them back. One day, you might see it, but I doubt it somehow. 148833[/snapback] Can I just verify now that you've had the last word you will desist from obsessing about me in virtually every single post, like you have been? Just that this would be a bit unfair as from now on I can't read your posts. And Gemmill, shut your mouth!