manc-mag

Is Villa one of them? I.e. was he the bloke Nigel Spink replaced? Correct. Apparently only Spink's second game or summat btw.

Goalkeeper Jimmy Rimmer has 2 European Cup medals with two different English clubs having played only 6 minutes of European finals. Name the clubs tbf.

Aye but that ball was on from the start of the match and it was a World Cup semi! I'd love it if that was the answer like, just pure amateurism and they'd run out of adidas balls. Mind you they managed to find one for the final. I was wondering whether it was cos they were two European teams and they'd possibly opted for a ball they normally played with in Europe? No idea ultimately mind. And as you imply, like shite would it be allowed these days whatever the reason.

Was watching the "Match of the Century" on youtube recently (Italy v West Germany 1970 semi final) and what I want to know is why are they playing with a white ball when it was the iconic world cup of: The Telstar ball. Evidence here: I don't know the answer to this by the way so sensible answers only because it's narking the fuck out of me. Also, was there a flower bed running all way round the perimeter of the Azteca or are my eyes deceiving me?

Former European player of the year iirc or did I make that up?

He had the odd game where he was mint though. Portsmouth home, and Derby away spring to mind when we won 2-1. * we sang ooh ahh Franzie Carr, before Cantona had even signed for t'Leeds. He had a couple of good games for us aye but I cant see how that would have translated to Serie A form. The rags had it for "Ooh Aah Paul McGrath" originally btw. I thought it was Villa who sang that, and was it not on the back of some 1991 hip hop track. He was away from Man Utd by then. Nah it was Man U much as it pains me to give them the credit for anything. I must have missed the hip hop track completely mind. Unless you're thinking of 'Oops upside your head' which must've been the late 70's rather than 1991

He had the odd game where he was mint though. Portsmouth home, and Derby away spring to mind when we won 2-1. * we sang ooh ahh Franzie Carr, before Cantona had even signed for t'Leeds. He had a couple of good games for us aye but I cant see how that would have translated to Serie A form. The rags had it for "Ooh Aah Paul McGrath" originally btw.

That's 6 games too many.

Always leaves us with an Eastenders 'dum-dum-dum' cliffhanger this lad with his polls.

Massimo Taibi was another keeper they signed to be the next Schmeichel. Wore tracky-b's and let a tame shot go through his legs. Never heard of again. Think he played two games and in one of them, he was class so he was actually 50:50 with regards to the quality of his performances. 'The Blind Venetian' as he was dubbed. Played more than two games for the rags though Shirley?

"The three-night camp-out has become an annual homage for the pair." Laying on the gay innuendo much?

Tbf I've never called you a 'cunt' even though we've had our differences for a few years now. Cunt or not, I still think we all want what's best by this club at the end of the day. We'd look right wankers wasting our time posting on here and arguing with each other otherwise.

WoooOOO, check out Kelvin Klein being all critical... Mwah Cheeky bint. Seriously though, I've never seen a man in a puffball skirt before.

Fucking class the last few pages of this thread, mind. Stevie man, what the fuck's going on with them shreddies?

money no object at the end of the day.

Class!

I've long since accepted there are a lot of loonie lefties on here Renton. I was young and idealistic myself once. Nowt to do with being left wing or idealistic Leazes, your views on this thread are just overtly racist, full stop. I'm a bit shocked tbh, but you are of course welcome to your viewpoint. I don't see much racist in what Wacky said in contrast. Renton. What are these "racist" comments ? Those which differ from you ? Look through the thread again, I was not the person who referred to "blacks", nor was I the person who referred to "niggers". Thats the problem with people like you, when someone doesn't agree with you, you just label them "racists". Fact is, the opening post stated a truth, which has been admitted as such, I agreed with the comment and was then immediately stalked by people who made no reference to the opening comment, only my comments in agreement. You are a left winger, and like all left wingers, get their knickers in a twist if someone doesn't agree with you about things like this, but you fail to see that people like me who are not happy with being told what we can and can't say in our own country doesn't make us "racists". What do you think of the people who restrict this "freedom of speech", yes, this old chestnut again, the UK where we are supposed to have freedom of speech according to the left wingers who then immediately hang others who voice comments they don't agree with and try to say they can't do it ? Do you understand this hypocrisy ? I suspect not. Do you not see the people who come into the country and failing to adapt are the racists ? Why shouldn't you expect someone entering a country to obey and conform to its laws and culture ? So, please, look through this post again, and look more carefully at who used the comments "blacks" and "niggers", it wasn't me mate, it was one of your own lefties. Hypocrisy ? You couldn't do it more perfectly if you tried. Touchy. Wacky's first comment ('blacks') was politically incorrect, but as it was true (New Orleans being a city inhabited mainly by black people), I wouldn't call it racist. Especially as it was really contrasting Japanese people with American people (look at thread title). You on the other hand have basically insinuated black people and immigrants predisposed to crime. You stand by this assertion even when presented with facts it is not true. And your own evidence? 'Common sense'. I can't really see how this can be anything but blatant prejudice, which makes it racist as well. You might not read the Daily Mail, but I would bet my house you read BNP leaflets. NJS's comments were clearly tongue in cheek, please tell me you know this. As for the rest, keep convincing yourself you're being persecuted for your beliefs if you want, and that the 'lefties' are trying to censure you. You must feel so disadvantaged as white middle aged man in this country, after all. None of your batshit beleifs make any odds to me, and I fully accept you have a right to say them. However, I'm not getting drawn into an argument with you after this post, as I know from many past experiences how utterly futile this is, as you seem to completely lack the ability to understand what anybody else is saying. If you don't believe me, ask yourself why virtually every member of this board has the same perception of you. Nail ------ Head

how stupid, as stupid as you ? No, of course not. Wanker. Leazes, you're a daft racist at the end of the day. Even when you make valid, moderate points about restrictions to freedom of speech, that doesn't change the fact that your motives are essentially racist. It's evident in so much of your output. nah, it isn't me who enforces my beliefs and cultures on countries I choose to emigrate to against their own establishments. I realise this is difficult for you to comprehend. Go back to your studies and try again. I think you supporting the racists makes you almost as bad as them, certainly as stupid anyway. Aye, righto. good. Let it drop. You and Renton think I'm a racist, I think you and Renton are racists. Leave it at that then. Except you don't actually think that, you're just saying it to try to make a point. Which is a different matter altogether.

how stupid, as stupid as you ? No, of course not. Wanker. Leazes, you're a daft racist at the end of the day. Even when you make valid, moderate points about restrictions to freedom of speech, that doesn't change the fact that your motives are essentially racist. It's evident in so much of your output. nah, it isn't me who enforces my beliefs and cultures on countries I choose to emigrate to against their own establishments. I realise this is difficult for you to comprehend. Go back to your studies and try again. I think you supporting the racists makes you almost as bad as them, certainly as stupid anyway. Aye, righto.

how stupid, as stupid as you ? No, of course not. Wanker. Leazes, you're a daft racist at the end of the day. Even when you make valid, moderate points about restrictions to freedom of speech, that doesn't change the fact that your motives are essentially racist. It's evident in so much of your output.

Leazes, even you're not that stupid ffs.

That all immigrants are 'bad uns'. FACT! Although it's become a more watered down "Britain is 'overpopulated'" as the thread has developed, hoping that nobody would notice. I think it was NJS that said that it was down to economic factors rather than, race, creed etc.... I'm proud as a country that we are willing to helpout people from less developed countries who are geniunley persecuted. Obv the system has been abused and numbers need to be regulated though.. When it comes to it, If I was walking down a dark alley with with either a gang of charvers at the bottom or a gang of immigrants, I know which group I'd be more aprehensive of. That's a moderate and perfectly valid viewpoint. Leazes on the other hand is just talking shit, as spoon fed to him by the right wing press. the likes of njs, hf, parky are just the other side of that coin. he might be out of line lumping you in with them, but he has a point with regards to the average "lefty's" position on this forum. Thing is, I'm not making an extreme leftist point just by pulling him up for talking baseless right wing nonsense, I'm merely pointing out he's talking shit. It's simply his stock in trade reaction to label you a 'loony lefty' if you disagree with him. After you do this, most threads of this ilk then tend to develop with someone expressing a more centre right view, which he'll then try and either i) claim supports his earlier (far right) views-which it almost certainly doesn't, or ii) adopt wholesale as his own-at which point the basic premise of the argument has shifted altogether and you're into the usual circularity nonsense.

Makes sense, as I think I might have seen her in something called Hungarian Honeys (can't remember what volume) come to think about it... She's good in gladiator as well! Dodgy moles though if I'm being hyper-critical. I've grown to like it! Who are you talking about btw? I'm struggling to follow the porn debate here on top of the immigration row.

That all immigrants are 'bad uns'. FACT! Although it's become a more watered down "Britain is 'overpopulated'" as the thread has developed, hoping that nobody would notice. I think it was NJS that said that it was down to economic factors rather than, race, creed etc.... I'm proud as a country that we are willing to helpout people from less developed countries who are geniunley persecuted. Obv the system has been abused and numbers need to be regulated though.. When it comes to it, If I was walking down a dark alley with with either a gang of charvers at the bottom or a gang of immigrants, I know which group I'd be more aprehensive of. That's a moderate and perfectly valid viewpoint. Leazes on the other hand is just talking shit, as spoon fed to him by the right wing press.

That all immigrants are 'bad uns'. FACT! Although it's become a more watered down "Britain is 'overpopulated'" as the thread has developed, hoping that nobody would notice.