-
Posts
54884 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
273
Everything posted by ewerk
-
They Might Be Giants - She Thinks She's Edith Head. Hence my new choice of avatar.
-
Nah Vodka is low in calories I think.
-
Draw (Match Result) Barnet v Plymouth (Sat Jan 27th - 15:00) 9/4 Birmingham (Match Result) Birmingham v Reading (Sat Jan 27th - 15:00) evens Draw (Match Result) Crystal Palace v Preston (Sat Jan 27th - 15:00) 2/1 Derby (Match Result) Derby v Bristol Rov (Sat Jan 27th - 15:00) 1/3 Ipswich (Match Result) Ipswich v Swansea (Sat Jan 27th - 15:00) 4/5 West Ham (Match Result) West Ham v Watford (Sat Jan 27th - 15:00) 4/5 Man. Utd (Match Result) Man Utd v Portsmouth (Sat Jan 27th - 17:15) 2/7 Ten quid pays out £1083
-
shut the fuck up G'wan the T-Keith
-
In his defence, the signings he has made haven't been bad. As he himself says, he could go out and sign several bad players for the sake of it. When you look at the players who he is aware of but not interested in signing, or the players he's watched, you see that the net is wider than Oliver's targets suggest. Martins has done ok for a £10m player, Sibierski was a lucky signing, Duff wasn't needed and Bernard and Rossi have been flops (albeit inexpensive flops). Roeder is sounding like a stuck up bitch who maintains she's holding out for "Mr. Right" and before she knows it she's a 40 year old spinster living in a house full of cats and its too late. The reason he got the job is supposed to be because he was the best manager available, better than us or any of the other candidates but to date his work in the transfer record is abysmal. The players are there, other clubs have signed them but Roeder's problem is that he can't identify the right player for the right price which is a huge part in being a successful manager.
-
Watching Oliver's video on the website and listening to some of the names he's rhyming off is depressing, the likes of Bent, Crouch, Davies, Bale and Barnes are all obvious and expensive targets, Jesus anyone on this board could have identified them yet this is the best Roeder can come up with? The man has been a complete failure in the transfer window and it just isn't good enough for a Premier League standard manager.
-
but 5m would buy us a decent CB and when I say decent I mean one that is better than we currently have It'd probably buy us two.
-
And who would be those cynical souls then? *raises hand. Then you'll enjoy this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnRx6sDz16g
-
Shite, I don't know many specifics about Johansson but got the impression he was a decent enough fella. Isn't Platini supposed to be Blatter MkII?
-
He's no Cherno Samba like.
-
http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=4...ainst+Gavrancic For fuck's sake! 25th of January he realises he isn't good enough, could he not of spoken to these people a couple of months ago and figured out who he was after. Tis a fucking mockery.
-
Aye he said something along the lines of, "Shearer called me a prick and he was right, I was being a prick".
-
So the Lancashire Cup is just between two unis? Worldseriestastic.
-
Not sure if this works or not, could give it a shot. Excellent work
-
"I think I'm offended", you were only asked a question you prick, how could that offend you? Idiot.
-
Have you ever heard a person from Hong Kong speaking to friends or family in Chinese whilst on the phone? They may have a greeting; of course they do. But they will still say 'hello' or 'okay' in English. No they say hoy, or something similar for hello. That's hi with a chinese accent. You didn't answer my question, by the way. Yes, yes I have. They do drop in English words but hello is not one of them.
-
Have you ever heard a person from Hong Kong speaking to friends or family in Chinese whilst on the phone? They may have a greeting; of course they do. But they will still say 'hello' or 'okay' in English. No they say hoy, or something similar for hello.
-
You reckon the Chinese don't have a word for hello then?
-
Tbh that's bollocks.
-
Should I have heard of Babel before?
-
No flys on you. A meringue? Some might say the answer was in the question, or at least directly below it.