ewerk

What are the 'genuine' safety concerns? I've looked it up and the data shows absolutely zero evidence of an increased likelihood of a cis woman being assaulted by a trans-woman in a shared setting.

The bit where they have to put down the fallers should make for interesting viewing.

Now sure seems like a good time to publish a league table of which nationality is doing the most raping.

When you've made nearly £200m in profit over the last three seasons then it seems a bit stupid to pick a fight with the ordinary fan, particularly when you're having a poor season by your own high standards.

Rashford looks decent going forward but still offers very little when he doesn't have the ball. He has his sights on a bigger club than Villa but I don't see which of them would want him. The big stumbling block is his wages. Maybe he is a good lad and will be happy to take a pay cut to progress his career but I doubt it and Man U will be loathe to subsidise his wages in order to get him shifted on a permanent transfer so there's nothing straightforward here.

I’ve got no statistics but put yourself in the shoes of a trans woman going to the gym and having to use the male showers.

20% of the country today feel very uncomfortable seeing two men kissing yet we legalised it nearly 60 years ago. What you call feelings I call prejudices. Personally I think most of the country wouldn’t be arsed about it. Referendum anyone?

I don’t see the decision itself as divisive. This isn’t America where the judiciary is politicised, the Supreme Court has in no way declared that they agreed with the law, they just clarified how the current law should be interpreted. If Starmer disagrees with the current law then he could change it in the morning. But he won’t because he has no convictions and balls the size of peanuts. If he had this view for years then I’d disagree with him but at least he’d have a strongly held view. Turns out he’s as much of a wet blanket as he initially appeared.

To all of you moaning that the membership is a waste of money, I’ve just been given exclusive pre-sale access to our preseason match against Arsenal… in Singapore.

Who knew he was capable of such statesmanship and solemnity? While stood beside a seven foot rabbit. https://x.com/catholicsat/status/1914347487600521585?s=46

Fox News: Genocide? No problem. Irish band calling out the genocide? Absolute outrage. https://x.com/kneecapceol/status/1914452410942283812?s=46

And if people feel more threatened by passing a black man in the street at night should we ban black men from being out at night? Edit: Not to mention that is a tiny vocal minority kicking up this fuss, or being used to make noise. Most of whom I imagine will be generally anti-trans.

Which is why it comes back to the point I made the other day, where’s the evidence?

Why’s the link top secret? Is this the new anti-Quiff policy?

I’ll never forget that 94th minute winner he scored in front of the away end.

Give it Giggsy till the end of the season.

The search function on there is actually pretty good for anyone with an IQ above single figures.

We used to have a play pen where Ant put Quiff from time to time. Wound him up no end.

Pipe down, yesterday’s man.

Discord is shite.

Stump up for the Patreon, fatty.

They had some decent satellites back then tbf.