Renton

clip fast buckle

That's not a fucking autonym! Try again. 124495[/snapback] According to Gemmill it is.

All nouns are man! I've already established that despite what these idiots think. 124490[/snapback] No they're not, and all you have established is that you're a thick twat! But then, we already knew this, so it doesn't belong in this thread....

No it's not. But is this: Orange

No you thick twat!

So is an autonym an autonym then? That is the question.

4 letters...literally. 124465[/snapback] That word's been banned.

It's a word that describes itself. 'Noun' is a noun 'Word' is a word 124446[/snapback] Aye. And Scott is a Scott. Dog is a dog. Cat is a cat. I'm sure I'm onto something with this noun thing. 124458[/snapback] But you are not literally a five lettered word though are you?

Are you cheating.

Yes you have dummy. Scott is your name but it doesn't describe you does it? It applies to verbs that describe themselves I believe. EDIT: Adjectives even 124443[/snapback] I don't think that's right. Give an example other than autonym? 124449[/snapback] Small 124451[/snapback] No, I don't think so. Catmag got it I think.

It's a word that describes itself. 'Noun' is a noun 'Word' is a word 124446[/snapback] Ahhh.

Yes you have dummy. Scott is your name but it doesn't describe you does it? It applies to verbs that describe themselves I believe. EDIT: Adjectives even 124443[/snapback] I don't think that's right. Give an example other than autonym?

No, but the word noun is an autonym. 124440[/snapback]

You charmer.

Did you know a word that describes itself is known as an autonym? 124415[/snapback] Hold on, my head is now hurting. The only autonym must be autonym then, right? Or did you make that up?

Personally, I don't worry about refereeing decisions too much because 90% of the time if you play well enough you get your reward. But what I have noticed is that fans of any team tend to be completely unobjective and selective in their memory about refereeing decisions. How many wrong decisions have actually favoured us? Probably quite a few in fact, but you won't account for them, because either you dismiss them wrongly or forget about them. That's not a criticism btw, it's just human nature.

I was the last year to do O levels. They were much harder than GCSEs, and that really is a fact. Proper exams in those days, none of this course work shite. I read recently that A level maths students today couldn't complete an O level maths paper from the 1970s - more FACT.

Did you know SLP never made it back from SoL?

I didn't. I did know that paracetamol is very toxic to cats though - they don't metabolise it like humans.

But why would I want to do that?! I'm staying at a pub! 124353[/snapback] Fair do's 124354[/snapback] Fair dinkum, Shirley?

That's not tough in the slightest tbh. 124351[/snapback] What's your answer then? I think it would be quite a difficult choice tbh, given a) Owen's injury record and his apparent lack of interest in NUFC. If it was just a player vs player comparison then it's Owen every time, but when you take other things into account.... 124355[/snapback] I'd choose Bellamy plus 6 million squid thankyou very much.

Most of his excuses were about us having injuries iirc, not refereeing decisions. Except he called them reasons. Well, these reasons don't seem to be preventing Roeder doing his job. Continue perpetuating the myth Souness was an unlucky manager if you like, but in reality nothing could be further from the truth.

That's not tough in the slightest tbh.

Souness wasn't criticised because we dropped points due to reffing, he was criticised because we played absolutley gash under him, ars. I suppose by your reckoning we've just been lucky under Roeder then?