Jump to content

Toonpack

Members
  • Posts

    13597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Toonpack

  1. The rules state it wasn't a penalty, therefore it wasn't an infringement, therefore no it wouldn't, what more do you need 🤷‍♂️ Outside the box if a player hits a shot and his follow through makes contact with a defender is that a defensive or attacking free kick or play on ????
  2. I was worried during the game at the time of the incident but I now know the rule, so I wouldn't claim an injustice in future, that would be illogical (captain).
  3. But knowing the rule, why ?? If it was standing leg fine, but making contact with the foot that's following though after a shot nope, an argument could be made he kicked Scharr. I know I'm being a tad facetious but the rule was (amazingly) correctly applied so I see no grounds for angst.
  4. The lass kicking rapist plays for them, cunts. Most dangerous city in mainland Europe 0 - Eddie's vichy bashers 3
  5. But it wasn't, as per the rules, so how can you get wound up by a correct decision 🤷‍♂️ Foden's follow through from his shot caused the contact. What would be annoying would be inconsistencies when/if it happens again.
  6. Hang on ! You'd be furious if we were not given a penalty contrary to the rules, when not giving it was a correct decision, and you're amazed an incorrect decision wasn't made (after a review) to reverse the correct decision ?? Aye ??
  7. Interesting article (well I thought so) - Iran https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/irans-capital-has-run-out-of-water-forcing-it-to-move/
  8. Judge him when he gets a run in the team with a full supporting cast (Tino in particular). WAY too early to judge just now.
  9. Won't happen, he's going to Italy with Tonali.
  10. 70-odd % possession and 38 touches in Forest box, maybe they should have bought a striker or two ...... Oh wait
  11. Hooked on 68 minutes for Chiesa who wasn't £130 million.
  12. According to the sky blokeys (Dawson and the ref one) talking before VAR ruled on it, it was indeed a goal !!!!
  13. “You’ve got to be worth a lot to lose $500 Billion in a few weeks”. 🙄 https://www.businessinsider.com/jensen-huang-market-nvidia-quarter-meeting-2025-11?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=insider-nvidiastock-sub-post
  14. Nah, Exeter, tasteful ground name.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.