TheInspiration

Reading between the lines, everything Roeder has said suggests he hasn't got a huge amount of faith in Bramble. Then again, it wouldn't be the first time that Roeder has maintained a position in what he says then does something totally different. The second statement is most deifnitely true, but I haven't heard/read enough fo what he's said about Bramble. I did however recall him saying something like "it should be well known that one bad game doesn't mean you're not a good defender" about Bramble, when about to select him for the next game. Too right Roeder, but a shedload of bad games might...

You'd hope so, but Roeder is still foolish enough to believe he is still a decent defender, and the fact he doesn't know how to attract defenders would suggest he'd offer him the contract in a panic to not lose another defender. Then play him regularly next season.

Okay, I did mean it's the parents' decision, provided the child likes the school and wants to go there. If they are sent there against their own will, but the parents think it's right, then that is wrong.

Think he played last season and got injured. Playing left-wing also, btw.

Future Premiership champions tbh. Two goals from Luque also, both from 30+ yards out. Excellent. No clue how well he's played that aside though. Ability to score from range is probably a good thing though, seeing as such a good midfield on paper can't get the ball to the forwards.

Interesting how more people are talking negatviely about Martins, then Duff, who has been extremely average at best.

To be honest, I am against the idea of faith schools as such, though simply a church school for example I do support. I was only saying it's the parents' decision, so it should be left entirely up to them whether they want their child to go there, and it's their right to if they feel it would help. As a Christian I would want people to become Christian simply because I feel it is the true religion, though I would never attempt to convert people, so I dislike the way people are indoctrinated, in such a way. However if they are taught lightly about the specific religion from an early age, say at church, they can learn about the religion, then when they are old enough to think for themselves they may do so. That has been my way of going about things, and the fact I haven't had a strict Christian upbringing has no doubt been a good thing. For the second point, I mentioned both science and religion, because of Bizza's comment that religion and school should be kept seperate. I was a bit unsure as to what it exactly meant. Did it mean people cannot even have their own religious unions, where people go at wish? Or did it simply mean there should be no indoctrination? But anyway, there could be religious followers in school, whose religion is kept seperate, but are taught views which they may disagree with. Not that evolution should not be taught in schools, but this could annoy them. For example, I used to go to a school which was very non-religious, and we had the odd assembly or lesson with the teacher saying "I know there could be some Christians here, but as far as I'm concerned this is what is true...", which was not nice to hear as there was no alternative theory spoken out.

As has already been said, it's the parents' decisions to send their child to that school, and if they think that's going to benefit them because they want them to grow up under the specific religion, then so be it. In my local area there's Christian schools, which aren't much different to standard schools. They aren't run by any Christian organisations, just run on Christian principles. These are fine surely. Also, despite what people may say about evolution being proven, people still may not agree with it, and that is taught in schools but that is deemed fine, whereas religion should have no place in schools?

Took them 31 passes to get nowhere tbh.

In Flames - Ordinary Story

Does Parker strike you all as a great captain?

We are too good to go down, but we won't get very far with Roeder in charge. Mid-table medicocrity.

What happened to our England future centre-half? Not his normal outstnading self.

Young wankers like us can't play three at the back as the defence is bad enough with four.

No success with top clubs makes him a crap manager.

and Gemmill will put it in his sig and share it with everyone else I did wash them thorughly, mind.

Yes. Speaking of which my aiming practice was all over the place this morning. Ended up getting urine on my feet. Had to be when pissing of all times that I kept sneezing. Just thought I'd share that with you.

I love how there's always doubts over new players at this club, so quickly also. There's always people who aren't content with something. He's just settling in and he's done pretty well imo. He should have scored at least twice against Everton, and I think with more games he'll be putting those chances away - the important thing is he's getting the chances.

To be fair, they were 3-0 down at half-time, so Benitez hardly masterminded the final. Wouldn't have won it without Gerrard's inspirational second-half performance. However he's obviously partly responsible for getting them to the final in the first place.

On what evidence? Umm, gets his players playing really well and he seems to have improved most of the player's games quite a lot since arriving.

In terms of managers in the Premiership, Benitez is probably the best coach, but his decision-making and in particular team selections can be awful at times.

Thought that had at least seven other players who can play there tbh.

Needs Lylat Wars and Zelda tbh. Goldeneye seems so outdated now.

Seriously considering getting a Wii now. Bit unimpressed with the Gamecube though, especially after such a great start to its life. I hope the Wii doesn;t go this way.

Can't remember ever not washing my hands after the toilet tbh.