Ketsbaia

Louise Taylor was obviously flicking her bean with delight when writing it.

-Heroes: Series 1 -A pair of boots -Reverend and the Makers album (No accounting for taste ) -Bride of Chucky and The Seed of Chucky My lass is weird. She doesn't like any of the romantic bollocks, she prefers practical things. It makes my job easier, like.

Bollocks. If we'd been playing pish and getting results there'd be a collective tug-a-thon on here. If we'd been playing well and losing just as many people would be picking holes in the side. As for the last part then you need to stop talking to these 'many people' because they're quite clearly nutters. I'm not suggesting folk would be happy, but they'd be showing damn sight more patience, of course you'll always get the boo boys, but no one was baying for Sir Bobby's blood in those first couple of tentative seasons in the manner that they have under Allardyce, mainly because fella wasn't taking the piss out of the fans with his team selection, and players clearly wanted to play for him, do our rabble look like they are playing for Sam ? They did against Blackburn. You honestly can't claim that half the side that Allardyce has brought in have decided they don't fancy playing for him anymore. It's a load of fantastical bollocks drummed up by the papers. Funny how when we were doing well the likes of Martins were coming out saying they'd "Stay as long as Sam stayed" yet today in the paper I read a drummed up bit of shite from Oba, originating from an interview months ago saying he was going to up sticks. Get behind the side and the manager rather than helping L.Taylor and her pals from the Sunday papers stoke the fucking flames.

It's not much of an argument is it ? Who could possibly argue against the fact that shepherd had a £38 million surplus when he became chairman yet left almost £100 million debt and had spent all of the money from Northern Rock and Adidas prior to the takeover ? Shit, it should be said that £44 million was spent on ground re-development. Who could argue against the fact that Shepherd sacked Bobby Robson and replaced him with Souness because he thought Robson was going to take us down and Souness would take us to another level ? No, it's hardly an argument, more like Desperate Housewives than anything. Shepherd did all this on his own ? You mean the majority shareholders said to him "just go ahead and make all the major decisions Freddie lad, put our fortune at stake and we'll see you on the golf course later." Wey aye. Of course. Your comment that I've highlighted shows what little you know - never mind understand - because it was Dogless Hall who came out in the press and said that. Which sort of backs up my first sentence. Don't let the obvious truth change your opinion though Sorry mate, but you seem to be just another person who when you are told about the position the club was in prior to the Halls and Shepherd taking over, falls on deaf ears. The people on the board, the ones who made the decisions were all Fat Fred's mates. 'Course they said that. Anyway, didn't Shepherd stamp his feet and act like a bairn because SJH wasn't taking enough interest in the club? Leazes, you're a fucking fantastic poster when you want to be, just let go of the past. Fat Fred has fucked off and there is nothing you can do to change people's minds about him.

Bollocks. If we'd been playing pish and getting results there'd be a collective tug-a-thon on here. If we'd been playing well and losing just as many people would be picking holes in the side. As for the last part then you need to stop talking to these 'many people' because they're quite clearly nutters.

not so bad after all ? It would seem that six other premiership clubs - so far - have also made ill - timed, rash judgements and decisions Ally I don't want them to sack Sam just yet, but it depends who they would replace him with, personally. I don't really have any idea who they would replace him with at the moment ie who is available, but thats not to say that I think he should be kept on if we continue to struggle, because we don't. Quite simply, if he seriously loses the plot he has to go. Oh no, he was still a complete and utter fucking cleft

Care to name names?

I'm surprised you've got an axe left to grind

I was drunk far too early last night

Keegan could have been an unmitigated disaster too, he hadn't proved himslf anywhere before he came back to us as manager. Liken to Shearer he had only proven himself to be a great player on the domestic and international stage but as it turned out he did quite well. you appear to be unaware that we were facing the biggest disaster in the clubs entire history when Keegan walked through the door though. Basically, he had absolutely nothing to lose, and would never have got the blame among people who were there at the time and knew this. And it actually took more bottle than anyone else had, which makes me laugh out loud at people who say he walks away when the going gets tough. I agree whole heartedly with Leazes. I can't believe i've just said that

If that happens i'm going to strap on an AK47 and fire rounds into the family of every moronic fucking spacker that has not only made a mockery of this club by going on SSN and saying "Why aye! Shearaaaaa needs to be tha managa like!" but those who have acted so fucking childishly over the past few games because things haven't went right. If Shearer becomes manager it could and probably will be an unmitigated disaster. He needs to prove himself first before coming anywhere near this club again.

Indicative of our luck that we put in a stellar performance yet still failed to get anything from the game. Hopefully we'll go into Wednesday with a bit more about us and the fans will use their voices to put the shits up Arsenal rather than our own players. I'm not expecting a result but a decent performance would keep me happy.

Start speaking shite again, I fucking hate having to agree with you

Happy birthday marra

RIP One of those names that never dies. I'm too young to remember seeing him but as far back as I can remember the name Evel Knievel was in my head.

I know what you mean abouts sportswear. I see JD Sports has actually dropped the sports from it's name.

+1 whenever i hear him speak i get excited and I'm proud we've got someone in charge who knows what he's doing for once. Then on match day though.... Same here. And he swears I like a manager that swears. I think he's totally deluded. Every word he says there about the players applies to him.... "'Nobody wants to hear your own fans giving you abuse or telling you what you're not doing and what they expect you to do but you have to strive to make sure it doesn't happen again. You've got to accept it when you play here, it's a special place when things are going well and it's a tough place when they are not. We will find out if we have the players who can cope with it." It's Allardyce who's making the same tactical balls up game after game. In that article he does acknowledge that some of the abuse was directed at him, it's in the bit you've quoted.

+1 whenever i hear him speak i get excited and I'm proud we've got someone in charge who knows what he's doing for once. Then on match day though.... Same here. And he swears I like a manager that swears.

I can remember hearing a story about how he superglued Bellamy's brand new trainers to the dressing room floor.

It was a bloody weird game like. Not only did Griffin score a tap-in but Bramble played like bloody Beckenbauer

Anyway, technically shouldn't it have been a Buffon own goal?

I can now see one of two things happening. This loss knocks the stuffing out of them, we actually perform well and get a result with Alan Smith getting yellow carded in the process, thus kick starting our season. The second and more likely option is that they're spurred on and demolish us. With Alan Smith getting a yellow card in the process.

Can anyone remember his waist high scissor kick on one of the diving, cheating Inter players when we got beat 4-1? I'm very surprised he didn't get red carded for that.

Didn't Ferdinand score the 10000th?