Jump to content

LeazesMag

Legend
  • Posts

    20312
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LeazesMag

  1. In reply to the earlier comment about Lee's achievement of finishing 5th, it was Dinnis who finished 5th and got us into Europe on the last game of the season. Before anyone says that it was Lee's team, it could be argued that part of it was Joe Harvey's team. 13924[/snapback] Partly true. Lee left in February, on course for that european spot. Dinnis carried on until the end of the season, keeping the momentum going, that is all. Thing is, the point you make about Lee taking over Joe Harveys players is more relevant than you thought. He did better than Joe Harvey with the same players ! , in fact much better, after he sold Macdonald. You can't argue with results. It was as big a rise up the league as last seasons fall. Jackie is right about Dinnis though, when he later stood on his own two feet he was just the same as Ardiles. However, the real disaster came when we appointed McGarry to clear up the "lack of discipline". If HTT wants to draw a comparison between this era and that one, this is the one he should keep an eye on.
  2. Pretty much the answer I would have gave. But to add a few things : Gordon Lee decided to sell MacDonald 1. For playing reasons, as Jackie says, he thought we were too much of a one man team, and saw the ability in others that if encouraged and allowed to blossom more would do so. Plus the injury record of MacDonald was such that the club knew he wouldn't finish his career so they took the money while it was on the table. For playing reasons, he was right. The team jumped from being 15th in the league for 3 seasons running, to 5th. This is the direct opposite to Souness, there is nothing similar about it, they were miles and miles and miles apart. 2. Lee then went on to achieve top 3 - 4 places for Everton for the next few years ie what is now Champions League places, beat their neighbours for the first time in years, and bought 3 England internationals for Everton, Colin Todd, Mike Pejic and Dave Thomas, in addition to Asa Hartford, a Scottish international. So much for him not liking stars. Can anyone explain why he didnt' buy these players for Newcastle ? Answer = the board wouldn't back him. Which is of course why he left. Simple. [People who think Shepherd doesn't back his managers could do with a reality check compared to this] It is true the Lee eventually lost his way and the team slumped and he was replaced by Howard Kendall, in fact only half a season I think after 3 good ones, but a fact not mentioned too often is he overhauled the clubs youth policy, which eventually produced Neville Southall, Gary Stevens, Trevor Steven, ? Ratcliffe, Kevin Sheedy ie the bulk of the team which won the league, FA Cup and Cup Winners Cup under Howard Kendall. 3. To those who say they were glad Lee left Newcastle, his last game was against Man City in the FA Cup, and news had leaked that he was on his way. The 40,000 plus crowd were chanting "gordon we love you", in all ends of the ground. I know because I was there. So I'm afraid they are guilty of a selective memory loss, but we see the same thing now regarding current players and managers just the same. I expect when fuckwit is out the door everyone will deny they ever supported him. When we played Ipswich in a game that was abandoned due to snow in november/december time, we were 2nd in the league, and Bobby Robson was raving about the way the team was playing, the confidence, spirit and the fact they were passing, moving, playing with intelligence and everyone played their part in a team performance. It was all true, and Lee's team and the way this team played had a profound effect on me, we were going places, we were playing like a quality side does. It wasn't until Keegan came that we saw it again. Souness or Lee ? Don't make me laugh. Gordon Lee brought Newcastle into the modern football world, they were still clinging to the 50's. He was ahead of his time.
  3. Come in, expose yourself. Your number is up. http://av1611.com/kjbp/kjv-bible-text/Eze-25.html
  4. The BBC website's articles resemble those of the Sun more every day. 13347[/snapback] and what paper do you read, clever clogs ?
  5. management pygmy tries to make himself look clever and good by winning arguments or ranting in the press like a hard man to disguise his ineptitude
  6. Gordon Lee, Keegan and Bobby Robson are the only managers at NUFC to finish in the top 5 in nearly 50 years mate.
  7. I was tempted to say bricks, but then thought there's no point in knocking them out we want to keep them awake and suffer complete and well deserved utter humiliation.
  8. both if you like. I've always thought we should do this to scumbags, muggers etc who beat up old people, kids, women or anyone really. Although [without getting back to earlier deliberately, just to emphasise the difference] a killer, murderer, terrorist is a different ball game.
  9. Should be entirely irrelivent, you should get the same sentence whether your a smackhead and a piece of shit or a drug free piece of shit. And the sentence should naturally be about 10 times what the fuckers will get if they're even caught. 13249[/snapback] absolutely matey thats what I meant. After a public flogging, stick them in stocks in the local high street where they can be pelted with rotten eggs, hockled on and let everyone see who they are for a few weeks too. They want to be big boys, and noticed, give them what they want. A lesson they wouldn't forget.
  10. hmm could have added a lot more stereotypes than that my experience of a fair few of our scottish brethren is that they do indeed. Not know when to stop would be a good expression. And my father in law is Irish .....
  11. what's dishing out a well deserved punishment to scumbags got to do with terrorists ? Terrorists should be executed....
  12. you mean comments like jocks are pissheads, and welsh are sheepshaggers ?
  13. this is what I was on about when i posted the scumbags thread earlier. Going back to last week when we had a thread about national service too..... No good saying the law will deal with them, the law is an arse, and if it doesn't work, it has to be changed.
  14. The law is a tool for justice, not revenge. I'm glad you don't make these decisions. 13086[/snapback] Yes the justice system works beautifully now. So you wouldn't like to see the smack head that took it upon himself to drag a 86 yearold woman off her feet, smashing her face on a wall in the process all for the measly sum of £20 given a few lashes of the Birch,because i know i would, infact i would like to do it myself. 13095[/snapback] spot on. I'll give you a hand
  15. aye definitely that one !
  16. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4156350.stm
  17. does it mean that all our posts will be held in the bloody google machine for 20 years !!!
  18. Why are women scared of spiders ??? Yep I know if it is sudden it makes you jump, but when they just run along the floor, or are in the bath.... Used to get my dog to eat them. One time I lifted up an old garden shed when I got a new one, and nearly dropped the old base because there was some HUGE ones underneath though......
  19. John McCririck ?? I had a ornament of him a few months ago won in a John Smiths promotion and left/lost it in a pub down pink lane.....then found out a few days later it was the most difficult one of the set and collectors were paying a few quid for it. Even less time for him now...... So if anyone found it, it's MINE !!
  20. Nail on the head Ally without realising. The yanks [and others] have nuclear weapons but can be trusted not to just fire them indiscriminately...because they haven't. I've met and worked with yanks, one or two can be a bit paranoid or hyper but basically they aren't going to use them unless they are fired at first. Do you think some middle eastern countries, or organisations, would adopt such a stance ? 11981[/snapback] thats a good idea,measure a countries policies by those people you know from that country(in my experience......france is a slut,the US is ok till put with others from the same place,denmark is mental,india is an america wannabee,turkey is paranoid) 6years for some...4 years for others 12221[/snapback] eh ? I said Then added Please explain, which of the above do you disagree with. Do you think they are all trigger happy, despite not using the nuclear weapons they have - FACT, or do you think I have met the only few who aren't - despite the others not using the nuclear weapons they have. Sorry, I haven't a clue what you mean by . You're not one of those who think if we lay down our arms in a gesture of goodwill , all the despots and terrorists of Al Queida etc are all going to say, "fair enough we'll drop ours too and join hands with the western brothers". The loony lefties said that about the Russians for decades while they continued marching on eastern europe....
  21. what I meant is what happened in 1945 .. presume this is what was meant ... is totally different to the world now. That bomb in 1945 ended a 6 year long war. Whoever fires the first one now will start one. Different reason ?? Where do you start .....
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.