ewerk 26360 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 FA to probe new Emre race claims The Football Association is to investigate claims Newcastle midfielder Emre racially abused Bolton forward El-Hadji Diouf in a Premiership match. The incident allegedly took place at St James' Park on 15 October. "We will be contacting El-Hadji Diouf to see if he wishes to provide us with a statement," said an FA spokesman. Emre, 26, already faces a personal hearing after denying a charge of using racially-aggravated language in his side's defeat at Everton in December. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t...ted/6368207.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottish Mag 3 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 FA to probe new Emre race claims The Football Association is to investigate claims Newcastle midfielder Emre racially abused Bolton forward El-Hadji Diouf in a Premiership match. The incident allegedly took place at St James' Park on 15 October. "We will be contacting El-Hadji Diouf to see if he wishes to provide us with a statement," said an FA spokesman. Emre, 26, already faces a personal hearing after denying a charge of using racially-aggravated language in his side's defeat at Everton in December. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t...ted/6368207.stm He'll be gone come the end of the season tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26360 Posted February 16, 2007 Author Share Posted February 16, 2007 If its true than he can fuck off but why has this taken so long to come to light? Its not like the camel humping wife-beater would be the shy and retiring type who'd be afraid to cause a fuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34495 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Out of order imo. Contact Diouf privately and ask him if he wants to make a statement. There's no need whatsoever to announce to the media that you'll be contacting Diouf to ask him whether Emre racially abused him. The FA are fucking thick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 is he still suspended ? sorry "injured". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13857 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Bandwagontastic! Who's next like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaser 1055 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Out of order imo. Contact Diouf privately and ask him if he wants to make a statement. There's no need whatsoever to announce to the media that you'll be contacting Diouf to ask him whether Emre racially abused him. The FA are fucking thick. Good point well made. Typical of the FA looking for scapegoats early doors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34495 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Out of order imo. Contact Diouf privately and ask him if he wants to make a statement. There's no need whatsoever to announce to the media that you'll be contacting Diouf to ask him whether Emre racially abused him. The FA are fucking thick. Good point well made. Typical of the FA looking for scapegoats early doors If he's guilty then I've got no sympathy for him at all, but unfounded allegations where you haven't even spoken to the alleged victim should be handled on the quiet until you have something concrete. Mud sticks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaser 1055 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If he is guilty then good riddance to him but like you said, he's going to be branded a racist now for the rest of his career and any such accusation in the future will hold due to this. Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17784 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Out of order imo. Contact Diouf privately and ask him if he wants to make a statement. There's no need whatsoever to announce to the media that you'll be contacting Diouf to ask him whether Emre racially abused him. The FA are fucking thick. Good point well made. Typical of the FA looking for scapegoats early doors If he's guilty then I've got no sympathy for him at all, but unfounded allegations where you haven't even spoken to the alleged victim should be handled on the quiet until you have something concrete. Mud sticks. No smoke without fire. Everyone ought to know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26360 Posted February 16, 2007 Author Share Posted February 16, 2007 Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? No, apparently tearing up a Mc Donalds because you don't want to be served by a "fucking Paki" isn't classed as a racist offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34495 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Out of order imo. Contact Diouf privately and ask him if he wants to make a statement. There's no need whatsoever to announce to the media that you'll be contacting Diouf to ask him whether Emre racially abused him. The FA are fucking thick. Good point well made. Typical of the FA looking for scapegoats early doors If he's guilty then I've got no sympathy for him at all, but unfounded allegations where you haven't even spoken to the alleged victim should be handled on the quiet until you have something concrete. Mud sticks. No smoke without fire. Everyone ought to know that. In a situation where it looks like they haven't even spoken to Diouf, I don't think "no smoke without fire" stands up as a good enough reason to make a public announcement before you've spoken to the "victim". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Out of order imo. Contact Diouf privately and ask him if he wants to make a statement. There's no need whatsoever to announce to the media that you'll be contacting Diouf to ask him whether Emre racially abused him. The FA are fucking thick. Good point well made. Typical of the FA looking for scapegoats early doors If he's guilty then I've got no sympathy for him at all, but unfounded allegations where you haven't even spoken to the alleged victim should be handled on the quiet until you have something concrete. Mud sticks. No smoke without fire. Everyone ought to know that. Here's me thinking it was innocent until proven guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8870 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Good riddance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smooth Operator 10 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Surely abusing El Hadj "spitter" Diouf isn't racist, it's just common sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoog 0 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Fucking witch-hunt tbh, look out for whinging lefties ahead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Fucking witch-hunt tbh Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Cos he's a dirty muslim tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16667 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If its true than he can fuck off but why has this taken so long to come to light? Its not like the camel humping wife-beater would be the shy and retiring type who'd be afraid to cause a fuss. Why is he a camel humper? also Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? No, apparently tearing up a Mc Donalds because you don't want to be served by a "fucking Paki" isn't classed as a racist offence. Thats not the reason why he was in court and he ripped McDonalds up because of some people in McD's not the workers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Given the acknowledged seriousness and offensiveness of racism, surely Diouf would have SAID something at the time? As far as I'm aware, the issue of abuse over skin colour is an incredibly sensitive one and one that will always provoke a very marked response. I don't buy this Diouf thing one bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If its true than he can fuck off but why has this taken so long to come to light? Its not like the camel humping wife-beater would be the shy and retiring type who'd be afraid to cause a fuss. Why is he a camel humper? also Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? No, apparently tearing up a Mc Donalds because you don't want to be served by a "fucking Paki" isn't classed as a racist offence. Thats not the reason why he was in court and he ripped McDonalds up because of some people in McD's not the workers. The alleged comment which emerged during his court appearance was "I don't want to be served by no Paki" in reference to one of the members of staff in the McDonald's iirc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16667 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 (edited) If its true than he can fuck off but why has this taken so long to come to light? Its not like the camel humping wife-beater would be the shy and retiring type who'd be afraid to cause a fuss. Why is he a camel humper? also Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? No, apparently tearing up a Mc Donalds because you don't want to be served by a "fucking Paki" isn't classed as a racist offence. Thats not the reason why he was in court and he ripped McDonalds up because of some people in McD's not the workers. The alleged comment which emerged during his court appearance was "I don't want to be served by no Paki" in reference to one of the members of staff in the McDonald's iirc. If thats so I stand corrected, I thought he was in court for allegedly hitting the asain chap (cant remember his name) /Edit found it:- Sarfraz Najeib /Edit again, found the McD's incident here:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Bowyer Edited February 16, 2007 by wykikitoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoog 0 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If its true than he can fuck off but why has this taken so long to come to light? Its not like the camel humping wife-beater would be the shy and retiring type who'd be afraid to cause a fuss. Why is he a camel humper? also Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? No, apparently tearing up a Mc Donalds because you don't want to be served by a "fucking Paki" isn't classed as a racist offence. Thats not the reason why he was in court and he ripped McDonalds up because of some people in McD's not the workers. The alleged comment which emerged during his court appearance was "I don't want to be served by no Paki" in reference to one of the members of staff in the McDonald's iirc. If thats so I stand corrected, I thought he was in court for allegedly hitting the asain chap (cant remember his name) /Edit found it:- Sarfraz Najeib I was under the impression he wasn't charged on either occasion and both offences weren't proven... could be wrong though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If its true than he can fuck off but why has this taken so long to come to light? Its not like the camel humping wife-beater would be the shy and retiring type who'd be afraid to cause a fuss. Why is he a camel humper? also Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? No, apparently tearing up a Mc Donalds because you don't want to be served by a "fucking Paki" isn't classed as a racist offence. Thats not the reason why he was in court and he ripped McDonalds up because of some people in McD's not the workers. The alleged comment which emerged during his court appearance was "I don't want to be served by no Paki" in reference to one of the members of staff in the McDonald's iirc. Fuck court, he should have been up before the grammar police. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If its true than he can fuck off but why has this taken so long to come to light? Its not like the camel humping wife-beater would be the shy and retiring type who'd be afraid to cause a fuss. Why is he a camel humper? also Was Bowyer ever found guilty of racism? No, apparently tearing up a Mc Donalds because you don't want to be served by a "fucking Paki" isn't classed as a racist offence. Thats not the reason why he was in court and he ripped McDonalds up because of some people in McD's not the workers. The alleged comment which emerged during his court appearance was "I don't want to be served by no Paki" in reference to one of the members of staff in the McDonald's iirc. If thats so I stand corrected, I thought he was in court for allegedly hitting the asain chap (cant remember his name) /Edit found it:- Sarfraz Najeib The McDonald's thing was an earlier incident (when he was still at Charlton). I think that's what Ewerk meant. And despite the racial element of that attack, I think the conviction had nothing to do with that, i.e. just criminal damage etc. He was acquitted in the Sarfraz Najeib retrial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now