Ketsbaia 0 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Luke Edwards is on 5 Live, just said that he's heard there was a blow up between Keegan and Llambias and Ashley stepped in to reassure Keegan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9065 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Stevie man, she's a tiny wee pig dog. turned you down didnt she? she looks like the only thing she wouldn't turn down is another drink. You're the one who's been taking photos of strangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GafferTape 0 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 I haven't managed a read since I left work at about 6pm. Has much else happened apart from the club statement that neither her nor there since? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Luke Edwards is on 5 Live, just said that he's heard there was a blow up between Keegan and Llambias and Ashley stepped in to reassure Keegan. Is he the one from The Journal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 How has this thread only had 3,300 views? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Luke Edwards is on 5 Live, just said that he's heard there was a blow up between Keegan and Llambias and Ashley stepped in to reassure Keegan. Is he the one from The Journal? Aye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 6441 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 is everyone fucking ignoring me or is it old news that KK has not resigned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 How has this thread only had 3,300 views? Fuck knows. It's longer than the 'Bizarre' thread but with about a twentieth of the views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9065 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 is everyone fucking ignoring me or is it old news that KK has not resigned? I think everyone is waiting on confirmation mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 is everyone fucking ignoring me or is it old news that KK has not resigned? Who said that? ( ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 is everyone fucking ignoring me or is it old news that KK has not resigned? It goes back to my.... Stevie, Glen, GafferTape, Mr Lahey, Ketsbaia, OzToonFan, trophyshy, ewerk, zico martin, ChezGiven, ElmptGeordie, Happy Face, IceMag ....theory I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9065 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 What theory was that Stevie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 6441 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 is everyone fucking ignoring me or is it old news that KK has not resigned? It goes back to my.... Stevie, Glen, GafferTape, Mr Lahey, Ketsbaia, OzToonFan, trophyshy, ewerk, zico martin, ChezGiven, ElmptGeordie, Happy Face, IceMag ....theory I reckon. rightio then, that's that cleared up everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 How has this thread only had 3,300 views? Fuck knows. It's longer than the 'Bizarre' thread but with about a twentieth of the views. Its got me wondering like, considering theres over 1600 posts it would seem logical that the author of each of those posts had to view the board twice, ie once prior to posting and once when it refreshes, that would only leave 100 views for everyone else????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 6441 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 How has this thread only had 3,300 views? Fuck knows. It's longer than the 'Bizarre' thread but with about a twentieth of the views. Its got me wondering like, considering theres over 1600 posts it would seem logical that the author of each of those posts had to view the board twice, ie once prior to posting and once when it refreshes, that would only leave 100 views for everyone else????????? Clocked it tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 How has this thread only had 3,300 views? Fuck knows. It's longer than the 'Bizarre' thread but with about a twentieth of the views. Its got me wondering like, considering theres over 1600 posts it would seem logical that the author of each of those posts had to view the board twice, ie once prior to posting and once when it refreshes, that would only leave 100 views for everyone else????????? Clocked it tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaser 1071 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Well i must have refreshed this page about 800 times today at least so that doesnt give much room for others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Did anyone see these charva's drinking cider live on Sky its all over all the other teams messageboards. What gans through a charvers heed? There's a camera I'll look good drink cider if I get on telly I need to see this on youtube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Lahey 0 Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Did anyone see these charva's drinking cider live on Sky its all over all the other teams messageboards. What gans through a charvers heed? There's a camera I'll look good drink cider if I get on telly I need to see this on youtube. The best thing about it was that at the exact same time, whoever was on SSN was reading out an email saying that these people were not represantitive of all Newcastle supporters, the camera panned away and the cock managed to get back in frame and proceeded to pour the rest of the bottle on some other mongs. Makes you proud really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12494 Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 What a daft cunt he was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 Take this how you will, I know ITK bollocks is all usually useless. I work at the England Cricket Board, and my manager, the director of corporate communications, used to do the same job at the FA, and basically at the request of Paul Collingwood and Steve Harmison he put a call into some people over there to try and find out: Keegan went mental re: the attempted sale of Barton and Smith behind his back. Nobody tried to sell Owen, that was never on the agenda, we were simply waiting until after deadline day to sort that out. He was furious as he'd said we shouldn't sell either with lack of adequate replacement. However, Ashley, Vetere, Jimenez and Wise considered Xisco and Gonzalez to be adequate replacement for both so went ahead with it, without consulting KK, and thus a complete fiasco ensued - in the end they said they wouldn't sell either but KK being a man of principle refused to back down, especially as Milner was essentially sold behind his bacl - despite public utterings to the contrary he was almightily unhappy about it. The current state of affairs: Keegan acte dout, heated arguments ensued in the meetings with him threatening to walk and the others threatening the sack. Keegan then said he was leaving and walked out but the rest have since realised his value to the club and are now doing their utmost to bring him back/persuade him that this wasn't done over his head, this is what they thought he wanted. He's let down as he does not have complete control over transfers, doesn't know the two new players and feels players are being offered to other clubs behind his back, and thus, as a man of principle, feels his position is untenable. Club reiterated they wouldn't sack him, but are now in the process of convincing him not to leave. From Theregulars on NO. Makes sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2188 Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 Take this how you will, I know ITK bollocks is all usually useless. I work at the England Cricket Board, and my manager, the director of corporate communications, used to do the same job at the FA, and basically at the request of Paul Collingwood and Steve Harmison he put a call into some people over there to try and find out: Keegan went mental re: the attempted sale of Barton and Smith behind his back. Nobody tried to sell Owen, that was never on the agenda, we were simply waiting until after deadline day to sort that out. He was furious as he'd said we shouldn't sell either with lack of adequate replacement. However, Ashley, Vetere, Jimenez and Wise considered Xisco and Gonzalez to be adequate replacement for both so went ahead with it, without consulting KK, and thus a complete fiasco ensued - in the end they said they wouldn't sell either but KK being a man of principle refused to back down, especially as Milner was essentially sold behind his bacl - despite public utterings to the contrary he was almightily unhappy about it. The current state of affairs: Keegan acte dout, heated arguments ensued in the meetings with him threatening to walk and the others threatening the sack. Keegan then said he was leaving and walked out but the rest have since realised his value to the club and are now doing their utmost to bring him back/persuade him that this wasn't done over his head, this is what they thought he wanted. He's let down as he does not have complete control over transfers, doesn't know the two new players and feels players are being offered to other clubs behind his back, and thus, as a man of principle, feels his position is untenable. Club reiterated they wouldn't sack him, but are now in the process of convincing him not to leave. From Theregulars on NO. Makes sense to me. Whether or not it's genuine ITK, it sounds about right. If KK has no say in who comes and goes, I can't see him tolerating that situation for long and why should he? It's his head on the block and he should at least be able to shape the squad as he sees fit. How he's expected to achieve things after that transfer window is beyond me, and he's been so undermined it's no surprise to me he's threatening to walk away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 I had a dream about the Hull match last night were KK wasn't our manager but commentating for Sky on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Roberto 0 Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 I had a dream about the Hull match last night were KK wasn't our manager but commentating for Sky on it. How did we do,did we win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoog 0 Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 Take this how you will, I know ITK bollocks is all usually useless. I work at the England Cricket Board, and my manager, the director of corporate communications, used to do the same job at the FA, and basically at the request of Paul Collingwood and Steve Harmison he put a call into some people over there to try and find out: Keegan went mental re: the attempted sale of Barton and Smith behind his back. Nobody tried to sell Owen, that was never on the agenda, we were simply waiting until after deadline day to sort that out. He was furious as he'd said we shouldn't sell either with lack of adequate replacement. However, Ashley, Vetere, Jimenez and Wise considered Xisco and Gonzalez to be adequate replacement for both so went ahead with it, without consulting KK, and thus a complete fiasco ensued - in the end they said they wouldn't sell either but KK being a man of principle refused to back down, especially as Milner was essentially sold behind his bacl - despite public utterings to the contrary he was almightily unhappy about it. The current state of affairs: Keegan acte dout, heated arguments ensued in the meetings with him threatening to walk and the others threatening the sack. Keegan then said he was leaving and walked out but the rest have since realised his value to the club and are now doing their utmost to bring him back/persuade him that this wasn't done over his head, this is what they thought he wanted. He's let down as he does not have complete control over transfers, doesn't know the two new players and feels players are being offered to other clubs behind his back, and thus, as a man of principle, feels his position is untenable. Club reiterated they wouldn't sack him, but are now in the process of convincing him not to leave. From Theregulars on NO. Makes sense to me. Whether or not it's genuine ITK, it sounds about right. If KK has no say in who comes and goes, I can't see him tolerating that situation for long and why should he? It's his head on the block and he should at least be able to shape the squad as he sees fit. How he's expected to achieve things after that transfer window is beyond me, and he's been so undermined it's no surprise to me he's threatening to walk away Sounds very plausible tbh, if it is true I hope that Kev sees clearer this morning and agrees to come back and the club make sure he's happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now