Jump to content

Remy Cabella - signs from Montpellier


Monroe Transfer
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 408
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So does Ben Arfa. I hope Pardew doesnt play hoof-ball or him and De Jong will look like fishes out of water.

Well I've said for a long time that Pardew is fucking hopeless so this is certainly a possibility but that doesn't mean we should go looking for negatives in our new signings at this stage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a short arse as well. Might struggle with the physicality of the PL as well.

 

That can also be a plus point, lower centre of gravity which gives him better balance which in turn allows him to glide past players like they aren't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We don't play hoof-ball under Pardew. That is a complete fallacy.

 

I've seen it with own eyes. He has specifically played Shola up front to miss out the midfield. Especially after Cabaye left and we didn't have any creativity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've seen it with own eyes. He has specifically played Shola up front to miss out the midfield. Especially after Cabaye left and we didn't have any creativity.

Funny because we played the 4th least amount of long balls last season (only more than Arsenal, Man City and Liverpool).

 

I think it's called confirmation bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny because we played the 4th least amount of long balls last season (only more than Arsenal, Man City and Liverpool).

 

I think it's called confirmation bias.

 

They only get counted as a long ball when they're accurate, and I can think of many a time when we've just pumped it long to nobody at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They only get counted as a long ball when they're accurate, and I can think of many a time when we've just pumped it long to nobody at all.

 

False.

 

We attempt 56 long balls per game. 12% are effective.

 

As opposed to Arsenal who attempt 55 long passes per game with 9% succession rate. Liverpool who attempt 56 with 10% succession rate. Man City 55 completing 9%....

 

http://www.whoscored.com/Teams/23/Statistics/England-Newcastle-United

 

You think we have 56 successful long balls per game? LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I didn't say successful. I said accurate. So pumping it upfield to nobody doesn't count. Check the glossary on that site.

 

Long Ball- An attempted/accurate pass of 25 yards or more

 

I assume the margin is pretty wide for what is considered "accurate". And how many terrible long balls do you think we play? Even if you think we play significantly more "non accurate" long balls than other teams (but I'm guessing you don't watch every other team enough times and close enough to estimate how many non accurate long balls they play), we're still going to be near the bottom of the list. It's no coincidence that Arsenal, Liverpool and Man City, three teams known for playing on the ground have played the least "accurate" long balls. But then we're the anomaly? Like I said, it's just confirmation bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simply looking at long ball statistics doesn't tell the true story either btw, as the stat isn't exclusively for defenders pumping the ball up to forwards. The limited range of passing in our midfield (after Cabaye left, which I mentioned in the summers transfers thread) will have contributed to keeping our long ball statistic down, whereas other teams probably have more capable long passers in other areas of the pitch. The stat doesn't tell you, for example, whether 80% of our long balls were Mike Williamson pumping the ball up field from the back and whether 50% of Liverpool's were Joe Allen spraying balls about from the centre of the park.

Edited by ClubSpinDoctor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also a bit ropey using those stats in comparison with Arsenal, yes they attempt a similar amount of long passes but they also have a significantly higher amount of passes per game then us. We sit at around 14% of our passes being long ball compared with Arsenals 10%, from what it looks like we're about middle of the road and play a mix. I feel CSD is right about the difference in long ball as a lot of ours do come from Williamson which bypass the midfield and often fail which is frustrating and stands out more, but I think when the ball is played to midfield we tend to keep it on the deck more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in the slightest. Where has anyone said we don't need a new striker and CB? Where has anyone said all is forgiven with Ashley?

 

What's been said is we have signed some exciting players and we are excited to see them. The two things are mutually exclusive.

 

Give it a rest telling everyone how wrong and fickle they are, it's boring now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.