Fulham away, I hate this fixture. If Dummett starts I'm deleting the thread when I get up so don't get too attached to anything you post.

[Andrew 7467]

3-1 to us.

[Guest MrRaspberryJam]

Just now, Andrew said:

3-1 to us.

Dummett hat trick and all is forgiven. 

[Monkeys Fist 50724]

Ah well, back to reality with a bang after the scouse mackems. 
 

 

5-0 to us.

 

6 from Wilson. 1 from Trips, 2 from Kurt Vonnegut ( the Tears for Fears gadgie), brought in as a lookalike for Tino. 
 

[Tdansmith 3260]

We win 4-0 with our 100 Million signing Excile scoring all 6 goals.

[The Fish 12573]

[Dr Gloom 26337]

Andrew out

[Monkeys Fist 50724]

35 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

Andrew out

Out or out out? 

[Andrew 7467]

52 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

Andrew out

Sounds like you want us to lose. fake fan.

[RobinRobin 14502]

6-7 or 7-6

Dummett with all of them after coming on in the 93rd minute

 

[Ayatollah Hermione 17238]

Their fans are quite angry at the moment so everyone bring your quinoa to throw on the pitch after 24 minutes 

[Dr Gloom 26337]

8 hours ago, Andrew said:

Sounds like you want us to lose. fake fan.

I’d be embarrassed to start a thread after overseeing a home draw to Gemmill’s relegation picks. 
 

Like a lot of the miserable old season ticket holders in the Milburn paddock, it’s time to step aside. 

[Andrew 7467]

10 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

I’d be embarrassed to start a thread after overseeing a home draw to Gemmill’s relegation picks. 
 

Like a lot of the miserable old season ticket holders in the Milburn paddock, it’s time to step aside. 

 

You seem to think I want to be starting these, are the titles too subtle?

[Toonpack 15584]

Radical musing:

 

Gordon's back for this, so obviously comes in. I'd give Murphy a shot in Longstaff's role and play either Gordon or Barnes on the right.

 

I think Murphy could do that job, he can hold the ball, beat a man and is way quicker than quicksand Sean.

Edited April 3, 2024 by Toonpack

[Dr Gloom 26337]

2 hours ago, Andrew said:

 

You seem to think I want to be starting these, are the titles too subtle?

need more hostility 

[Dr Gloom 26337]

8 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

Radical musing:

 

Gordon's back for this, so obviously comes in. I'd give Murphy a shot in Longstaff's role and play either Gordon or Barnes on the right.

 

I think Murphy could do that job, he can hold the ball, beat a man and is way quicker than quicksand Sean.

he’s not dropping Longstaff. Seems to be one of Howe’s blind spots. Along with persisting with Burn at left back 

[Gemmill 63171]

52 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

Radical musing:

 

Gordon's back for this, so obviously comes in. I'd give Murphy a shot in Longstaff's role and play either Gordon or Barnes on the right.

 

I think Murphy could do that job, he can hold the ball, beat a man and is way quicker than quicksand Sean.

 

You'd play Anderson there before you thought about putting Murphy there. 

 

You need to start doing jigsaw puzzles or something, keep that mind active, or these suggestions will start getting worse. 

[Dazzler 16172]

Fuck it, 2-1

 

Dummett to score both, and then stick another hole in Jimenez's skull, hockle in it, and gift them another pen - which will be scored by the spectre of Jimmy Hill's chin. 

 

[Toonpack 15584]

25 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

You'd play Anderson there before you thought about putting Murphy there. 

 

You need to start doing jigsaw puzzles or something, keep that mind active, or these suggestions will start getting worse. 

Ok for the slow amongst us:

 

From last nights starting XI, you take Murphy and slot him into Longstaff’s position (who is rested). Gordon takes the open slot. Anderson is still in the side, in a position he’s done well in, don’t want to mess with that.

 

It’s not that difficult a concept to grasp. Perhaps I should have tabulated my thoughts in a spreadsheet.

[Dazzler 16172]

3 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

Ok for the slow amongst us:

 

From last nights starting XI, you take Murphy and slot him into Longstaff’s position (who is rested). Gordon takes the open slot. Anderson is still in the side, in a position he’s done well in, don’t want to mess with that.

 

It’s not that difficult a concept to grasp. Perhaps I should have tabulated my thoughts in a spreadsheet.

[Dr Gloom 26337]

I’m going to this one too. Two games in a week. Reckon we’ll win this one. We’ve got a good record there 

[Alex 42149]

15 hours ago, Monkeys Fist said:

Ah well, back to reality with a bang after the scouse mackems. 
 

 

5-0 to us.

 

6 from Wilson. 1 from Trips, 2 from Kurt Vonnegut ( the Tears for Fears gadgie), brought in as a lookalike for Tino. 
 

It’s a mad world 👍🏻

[Dr Gloom 26337]

29 minutes ago, LongTimeAdmirer said:

I’ve already seen us win once there this season 

 

[The Fish 12573]

Isak in the middle, Gordon on the right, Barnes on the left. Stick with the same midfield through necessity. Hall at LB, stick with the rest through necessity. 

 

The only big change I'd make is bringing on kids instead of Ritchie or Dummett. In a season where our intensity has been exhausted, the very least you can expect from kids is an over abundance of enthusiasm.

[Isegrim 11894]

[Dr Gloom 26337]

I’d be tempted to put Murphy at right back ahead of krafth. He’s looked alright there at times this season. Then we could go with Barnes and Gordon in the flanks. I’d bench longstaff and play willock and Anderson in midfield with Bruno - Howe won’t do this of course. Hopefully Lewis Hall is okay to continue at left back. Fuck all on the bench yet again.
 

We’ll need early goals as we’ll be hanging on after 60-70 minutes when they freshen up and won’t want to rely on Dummett and Ritchie off the bench. I’d rather throw the kids on - at least they’ll be able to run