Toonpack

Wrong - Not me. This is Newcastle United playing a competitive game, there is NOTHING above that.

Definitely City preferred for me too.

Worked in the mailroom at Norgas House in Killingworth, died evidently and sadly not very old.

FYP

As we could have as well tbh.

Murphy's shirt, Thiaw's pocket.

For someone who is supposedly so zen, he needs a good helping of self reflection although he also needs to be playing with Hall in the team for a fair comparison, the FB's add so much to the wingers.

So evidently on Twatter you can (could) look at a profile and see where a user is posting from, turns out a load of big MAGA influencer accounts are based in (drum roll) 😂😂😂

Immense talent, zero application, makes you wonder if he ever works at his game, Root/Stokes are notorious for working on their game but I suspect Brook just relies on his god given gifts and his attitude/demeanor sucks. When he comes off he's frighteningly/destructively good but the Aussie bowlers will get him worked out, if they haven't already, bowl back of a length outside off or in-line short with legside boundary fielders and you're sorted, he can't resist it.

Only to ignorant cunts 😘

Daniel Whelan, Packers punter (Fucking heathens)

Good lad is Daniel

One of those days 😞

As I said it’s simply a matter of typing efficiency (laziness) for me with zero premeditated thought behind it, I just do, if I was writing (a dying art) I’d write Man City and I say Man City when/if speaking of them.

Always Man City to me BUT when typing I’ll just use City - everyone would know who I mean, given they’re the only currently relevant one, in conversation I’d use/say Man City. For Man Utd I usually use “red manc cunts” never the U word.

But it's the rule, stupid or not, all else is utterly irrelevant.

Straw/camels back

Planet killing AI whore 😘

The rules state it wasn't a penalty, therefore it wasn't an infringement, therefore no it wouldn't, what more do you need 🤷‍♂️ Outside the box if a player hits a shot and his follow through makes contact with a defender is that a defensive or attacking free kick or play on ????

I was worried during the game at the time of the incident but I now know the rule, so I wouldn't claim an injustice in future, that would be illogical (captain).

But knowing the rule, why ?? If it was standing leg fine, but making contact with the foot that's following though after a shot nope, an argument could be made he kicked Scharr. I know I'm being a tad facetious but the rule was (amazingly) correctly applied so I see no grounds for angst.

The lass kicking rapist plays for them, cunts. Most dangerous city in mainland Europe 0 - Eddie's vichy bashers 3

But it wasn't, as per the rules, so how can you get wound up by a correct decision 🤷‍♂️ Foden's follow through from his shot caused the contact. What would be annoying would be inconsistencies when/if it happens again.

Tino, canny interview, gives Murphy a lot of love