Generic small time football blather thread FOREVER

[Gemmill 34622]

 

I haven't been able to read the whole thing but even just the intro to this would seem to suggest Everton would somehow be in even worse shape if they get taken over by 777 than they are currently.

 

[RobinRobin 9249]

1 hour ago, Gemmill said:

 

I haven't been able to read the whole thing but even just the intro to this would seem to suggest Everton would somehow be in even worse shape if they get taken over by 777 than they are currently.

 

[Gemmill 34622]

 

Villa sailing close to the wind.

 

[The Fish 9015]

21 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

Villa sailing close to the wind.

 

If I've read that right, we've made around 85m loss in the last two reporting years? If so, surely we need to make a profit of 60m+ to stay compliant?

[ewerk 26456]

PSR allows losses of £105m over a three year period so you really couldn’t be much more wrong.

[Gemmill 34622]

Honestly I didn't even spot we were on there til you pointed it out. I've tried looking around to see what our current FFP/PSR position is after that last set of accounts, but I've given up.

 

Let Dazzler or Howay work it out and explain it.

[ewerk 26456]

2 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

Honestly I didn't even spot we were on there til you pointed it out. I've tried looking around to see what our current FFP/PSR position is after that last set of accounts, but I've given up.

 

Let Dazzler or Howay work it out and explain it.

 

[Gemmill 34622]

Listen I wasn't going to say anything, but seeing as you've begged me to notice you, YOU'VE MADE A MISTAKE.

 

What Dave was saying that it looks like our combined loss for the last two financial years is £160m+, because the graphic shows us making a loss in each of the last two financial years of £80m+.

 

Not a combined loss of £85m, which I believe is how you've interpreted his post.

 

Consider yourself scolded by a genuine, bona fide, ICAEW Member.

 

I'm gonna include this in my CPD declaration.

[Gemmill 34622]

 

Hope he loses and drowns in legal costs.

[ewerk 26456]

23 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

Listen I wasn't going to say anything, but seeing as you've begged me to notice you, YOU'VE MADE A MISTAKE.

 

What Dave was saying that it looks like our combined loss for the last two financial years is £160m+, because the graphic shows us making a loss in each of the last two financial years of £80m+.

 

Not a combined loss of £85m, which I believe is how you've interpreted his post.

 

Consider yourself scolded by a genuine, bona fide, ICAEW Member.

 

I'm gonna include this in my CPD declaration.

 

The £160m loss won't be a £160m loss by PSR criteria, it will be less. So welcome to Wrongsville.

[Dougle 2864]

6 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

Hope he loses and drowns in legal costs.

 

He looks fucking ancient in black and white

[Gemmill 34622]

Ugh look at this. Trying to divert from his own stupidity.

 

I'm WELL AWARE that those figures won't be the ones we use for PSR. That's why I didn't respond to Dave and say "well fuck Dave, looks like you're right".

 

It's why I instead went looking for details on our latest PSR position. But I couldn't find anything definitive and gave up.

 

Now please. Stop challenging the professor.

[Gemmill 34622]

1 minute ago, Dougle said:

 

He looks fucking ancient in black and white

 

That's maybe why he sold us.

[Gemmill 34622]

 

Arrogant cunt latest. Build a new ground for Man United with taxpayer money? That'll be a no, dickhead.

 

[Ayatollah Hermione 12767]

Manchester has a stadium built with public money so why don’t they ground share with Man City?

[Kid Dynamite 5941]

2 hours ago, The Fish said:

If I've read that right, we've made around 85m loss in the last two reporting years? If so, surely we need to make a profit of 60m+ to stay compliant?

Champions league and Adidas money should

cover that? 

[spongebob toonpants 3606]

2 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Hope he drowns

Fyp

[Dazzler 5541]

3 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Honestly I didn't even spot we were on there til you pointed it out. I've tried looking around to see what our current FFP/PSR position is after that last set of accounts, but I've given up.

 

Let Dazzler or Howay work it out and explain it.

 

I may be an accountant but I never once claimed to be a good one

 

[aimaad22 3472]

3 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Listen I wasn't going to say anything, but seeing as you've begged me to notice you, YOU'VE MADE A MISTAKE.

 

What Dave was saying that it looks like our combined loss for the last two financial years is £160m+, because the graphic shows us making a loss in each of the last two financial years of £80m+.

 

Not a combined loss of £85m, which I believe is how you've interpreted his post.

 

Consider yourself scolded by a genuine, bona fide, ICAEW Member.

 

I'm gonna include this in my CPD declaration.

 

Besmerching plain old accountants on here wasn't enough, lets drag the ICAEW into it!

 

[sammynb 2929]

1 hour ago, Dazzler said:

 

I may be an accountant but I never once claimed to be a good one

 

 

Modesty, a self-awareness old mate @Gemmill will never know. 

[Gemmill 34622]

 

Pretty radge that this bloke was hired to manage women's teams despite having a known reputation. In this day and age.

[The Fish 9015]

16 hours ago, ewerk said:

 

The £160m loss won't be a £160m loss by PSR criteria, it will be less. So welcome to Wrongsville.

Is the loss reported on there a sum total of all costs incurred each year? So it would include any works done on the infrastructure, facilities, backroom staff, youth and women's teams etcetera?

[MMXXVIII 1042]

1 hour ago, Gemmill said:

 

Pretty radge that this bloke was hired to manage women's teams despite having a known reputation. In this day and age.

 

[wykikitoon 16734]

UEFA closed the Legia Warsaw ultra’s section for tonight’s game over “offensive banners”

But the ultras have just taken over another section of the ground and responded with this

 

 

[RobinRobin 9249]

2 hours ago, Gemmill said:

 

Pretty radge that this bloke was hired to manage women's teams despite having a known reputation. In this day and age.

Frightening in any day and age.