Eddie Howes Champions League Chasing, Six Pointer Winning Mags vs absolutely not still a russian asset, no sir not us, make america great again comrade...Chelsea

[OTF 8902]

11 minutes ago, Holden McGroin said:

Funnily enough the on field decision was yellow card so he clearly wasn't influenced enough.

 

 

He's not the best interview, don't think his Emglish is very good, though he still managed to politically sidestep answering the question about the Jackson red card instead moaning about other decisions. Pretty absurd if you watched the game as Chelsea had the better of the calls especially in the second half. It was as though the ref was trying to even up the red card even though it was an indisputable legitimate red.

[Holden McGroin 8145]

Just now, OTF said:

He's not the best interview, don't think his Emglish is very good, though he still managed to politically sidestep answering the question about the Jackson red card instead moaning about other decisions. Pretty absurd if you watched the game as Chelsea had the better of the calls especially in the second half. It was as though the ref was trying to even up the red card even though it was an indisputable legitimate red.

Yeah. He could have just been alluding to the fact some refs are homers in hostile atmospheres. 

[OTF 8902]

2 minutes ago, Holden McGroin said:

Yeah. He could have just been alluding to the fact some refs are homers in hostile atmospheres. 

Just classic deflection. I think he genuinely believed it though as he was whinging excessively much of the game. Just as entitled and delusional as the players and the club in general. Hope Forest have their best game of the season and destroy them in the final game.

[Dazzler 12794]

9 minutes ago, OTF said:

Just classic deflection. I think he genuinely believed it though as he was whinging excessively much of the game. Just as entitled and delusional as the players and the club in general. Hope Forest have their best game of the season and destroy them in the final game.

Hopefully Nuno didn't take their fat cunt chairman coming down and berating him on the pitch the same way I would - otherwise he's out of work today and Chelsea steamroll Forest under their caretaker.

[Gemmill 53116]

8 minutes ago, Dazzler said:

Hopefully Nuno didn't take their fat cunt chairman coming down and berating him on the pitch the same way I would - otherwise he's out of work today and Chelsea steamroll Forest under their caretaker.

 

He was unbelievably diplomatic in the post match interview. Nuno, that is. Just said that football is a game of emotions and everyone in that crowd would have been feeling emotions, and basically that's fine. 

 

I would have said I've never seen the fat cunt move so quick and he should have stayed in both of his seats. 

Edited 7 hours ago by Gemmill

[RobinRobin 13039]

2 hours ago, Dazzler said:

He's not wrong tbf - the sound of forearm on jaw makes a sort of cracking sound if you catch it sweetly enough.

Didn't think you could reach. 🙂 

[David Kelly 1408]

Stephen Warnock: "The centre-back does not jump. If the defender jumps, Jackson's arm goes into his chest.

"I just think it is mistimed from Jackson and it's very unfortunate."

 

I'm only getting this form the Sky Sports website so there may be context missing and he may still have said the red was correct, but this is one of the most ridiculous takes on a foul I've ever heard.  

 

 

[Gemmill 53116]

5 minutes ago, David Kelly said:

Stephen Warnock: "The centre-back does not jump. If the defender jumps, Jackson's arm goes into his chest.

"I just think it is mistimed from Jackson and it's very unfortunate."

 

I'm only getting this form the Sky Sports website so there may be context missing and he may still have said the red was correct, but this is one of the most ridiculous takes on a foul I've ever heard.  

 

 

 

Russell Martin was on MOTD and he reckons it was def a red but that, when Jackson glances at Botman he's standing up straight, and in the time that he looks away and leads with his arm, Botman dips down. 

 

He was basically arguing that it was a red but he didn't think there was an intent to get Botman in the face. 

 

Maybe he's right I dunno. 

[Toonpack 12290]

When you look at a player and then still clatter them in the head the interpretation can only be you meant it.

[Gemmill 53116]

Well, no. Because you can not intend to make contact with their head. 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 4430]

14 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

Russell Martin was on MOTD and he reckons it was def a red but that, when Jackson glances at Botman he's standing up straight, and in the time that he looks away and leads with his arm, Botman dips down. 

 

He was basically arguing that it was a red but he didn't think there was an intent to get Botman in the face. 

 

Maybe he's right I dunno. 

I think anyone claiming there is/isn’t intent are thick cunts who should be gelded, blinded and tongue ripped out. It is impossible to prove intent unless someone confesses to it. Nobody knows what someone is thinking when they do something.

Edited 5 hours ago by Kevin Carr's Gloves

[Gemmill 53116]

Telling it like it is. 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 4430]

1 minute ago, Gemmill said:

Telling it like it is. 

I ran out of prozac last week and there’s a shortage apparently.

[Toonpack 12290]

1 minute ago, Gemmill said:

Well, no. Because you can not intend to make contact with their head. 

 

True but I looked at him, jabbed me arm/elbow into his mush but I didn't mean it is a less likely explanation than "I did him".

 

If you're not looking, fine.

[Rayvin 6586]

It's not like it even hurt Chelsea, they were better without him. In the end he's a bellend, playing for a bellend club, whose suspension will only sadden bellends. That's all that really matters.

[Toonpack 12290]

5 minutes ago, Kevin Carr's Gloves said:

I think anyone claiming there is/isn’t intent are thick cunts who should be gelded, blinded and eyes gouged out. It is impossible to prove intent unless someone confesses to it. Nobody knows what someone is thinking when they do something.

Intent is irrelevant tbh, serious foul play occurred.

[Dr Gloom 24420]

Just now, Toonpack said:

Intent is irrelevant tbh, serious foul play occurred.

 

yeah. you can argue over whether there was intent but you can't argue that botman took an elbow to the face and that is an automatic red. it also looks like he sized it up before the contact was made, which didn't help his cause. 

[OTF 8902]

46 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

 

yeah. you can argue over whether there was intent but you can't argue that botman took an elbow to the face and that is an automatic red. it also looks like he sized it up before the contact was made, which didn't help his cause. 

Plus at no point was he going for the ball, or even aware specifically where the ball was. Text book violent conduct.

 

VIOLENT CONDUCT

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

[Craig 7611]

Bruno blowing Enzo Fernandez a kiss

 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJjWeOJi3H-/?igsh=MXA3MnRsMnVoYWEwcg==

[Holden McGroin 8145]

10 minutes ago, Craig said:

Bruno blowing Enzo Fernandez a kiss

 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJjWeOJi3H-/?igsh=MXA3MnRsMnVoYWEwcg==

Love it.