Isegrim

84730[/snapback] I can just imagine you doing that, you pompous tart. 84734[/snapback] Oi fatty, for you it's still Dr. pompous tart. 84741[/snapback] Dr. Wolfie tbh. Poor man's Dr. Fox. 84743[/snapback] I think your antipathy towards doctorates stems from the fact that you failed with Dr. Atkin's diet... 84749[/snapback] Doctor Doctor! Give me the news! I've got a bad case of pickled cabbage poo! 84752[/snapback] And bad eyes as I am a lawyer not a proctologist...

84730[/snapback] I can just imagine you doing that, you pompous tart. 84734[/snapback] Oi fatty, for you it's still Dr. pompous tart. 84741[/snapback] Dr. Wolfie tbh. Poor man's Dr. Fox. 84743[/snapback] I think your antipathy towards doctorates stems from the fact that you failed with Dr. Atkin's diet...

84730[/snapback] I can just imagine you doing that, you pompous tart. 84734[/snapback] Oi fatty, for you it's still Dr. pompous tart.

I'd heard they were hardly EVER used to kill people in Switzerland..................... 84644[/snapback] Yep, there was a huge upyodel down in the south when a lunatic stormed a local parliament and shot a few people by using his compulsory weapon. The holding of guns was discussed afterwards and they changed their gun laws. 84661[/snapback] surprised they haven't invaded you lot TBH - they spend more on arms than you do, they have a big army ......................... 84666[/snapback] No reason, they already have "our" gold...

I'd heard they were hardly EVER used to kill people in Switzerland..................... 84644[/snapback] Yep, there was a huge upyodel down in the south when a lunatic stormed a local parliament and shot a few people by using his compulsory weapon. The holding of guns was discussed afterwards and they changed their gun laws.

This thread cries for a gardening advice... Horse manure is for stiff and cold ground; sheeps for hot and dry; ashes for cold, stiff and moist; old woolen rags for poor and dry; lyme is most excellent for moorish and heathy land; hair of beasts for dry and stiff ground; pigeons and poultrie-manure for cold and moist; rotten saw dust for dry; rubbish of buildings for stiff cold grounds; salt for cold and moist but use it moderately, for it destroys vegetables on dry ground, especially at first, but when melte by winter rains, it fertilizeth. - John Reid, The Scot's Gardener, 1600

An excellent example of good old fashioned, well rounded, vicarious living. 84497[/snapback] In all honesty (and with the greatest of respect to Pedro, who is a true legend) the only way that gormless muppet could succeed in making himself look more gormless is by having Little Peter's physog tatood onto him! By the way it seems to be lost on everyone that apparently, although he can't afford a season ticket HE CAN AFFORD TO PAY 700 QUID FOR A TATTOO!!!!!!!!!!!! 84500[/snapback] Everyone did mentioned that!! 84508[/snapback] Jesus Wept on a bike tbh! 84509[/snapback] He got 36 on that test tbh. 84520[/snapback] What he even new how many books are in the new testament. The man is a genius. I think about getting his weeping face tattooed on my chest.

Well, ok I am jealous. I admit it because I only got 24. So I might struggle in an English mensa test, but at least I know how to spell latin words correctly... 84478[/snapback] Res ipsa loquitur tbh 84491[/snapback] [Classical scholar joke mode] Whoever writes millennium with only one 'n' makes an arse out of himself. FACT tbh.[/classical scholar joke mode]

Well, ok I am jealous. I admit it because I only got 24. So I might struggle in an English mensa test, but at least I know how to spell latin words correctly...

Hardly earth shattering news is it? The managers keep their jobs because they get better results. 84459[/snapback] Or vice versa??? http://sport.independent.co.uk/football/ne...ticle337749.ece 84461[/snapback] What is vice versa? Crap managers who don't get results get sacked. And which clubs most often sack their managers? Those underachieving, especially those in relegation fights. Latter is excatly why we should sack the manager now by the way... 84462[/snapback] Vice versa meaning its entirely possible that those clubs that dont constantly sack their managers get better results. 84464[/snapback] IMHO it only says successful managers don't get sacked. The reverse logic doesn't work . Just have a look which teams in the Premiere League have changed their manager less times than Newcastle. Ok, ManUre. But Chelsea for example even had more managers. Liverpool still had four, the only one staying despite more or less no success was Evans. Though, after Souness had destroyed the clubs expectations were lowered. Arsenal don't constantly sack their manager because they found the right man in Wenger.

Hardly earth shattering news is it? The managers keep their jobs because they get better results. 84459[/snapback] Or vice versa??? http://sport.independent.co.uk/football/ne...ticle337749.ece 84461[/snapback] What is vice versa? Crap managers who don't get results get sacked. And which clubs most often sack their managers? Those underachieving, especially those in relegation fights. Latter is excatly why we should sack the manager now by the way...

The whole stability thing is absolutely nonsense IMHO. Successful managers who match the club's ambition stay, those who are not doing what they are expected to do get the sack. Just one example from Jormany. Bayern München between 1991 and 1998 had nine (!) managers. They tried it with success and experience (e.g. Rehhagel), youth (Lerby) or the foreign bloke (Trapattoni). Whenever they noticed that it does not worked out the manager got the sack. The same is with Newcastle. It isn't just the trophy everybody is lasting for that is making the club difficult to magage. Those managers who find it difficult are just shifting the blame because they were crap. That's why Keegan and Robson staid for several years. Both were successful. On the other hand Dalglish, Gullitt and now Souness were/are disasters. It's not a sign of instability to sack crap managers or managers who doesn't fit in.

Hmm, no Anal O. stories since Monday...

84396[/snapback] As I understand it the lack of certain key words should have given the hint that it wasn't the GREAT Anal O. who wrote this excellent piece of work ... notice also the lack of mentioning that Brett Emerton will be a Newcastle player by the end of the week...

Hey, clique-iness doesn't mean we have to post the same thing... btw - I heard that as a life long Sounessfan Gemmill wants the picture of his idol tattooed on his genitalia...

I never wanted him in in the first place. But I was prepared to give him time etc etc. 84350[/snapback] Boo. SLP apologist tbh. manc-mag out! 84352[/snapback] I've had literally dozens of PM's supporting me tbh. 84354[/snapback] I literally have PMS reading other people getting dozens of supporting PM's...

I never wanted him in in the first place. But I was prepared to give him time etc etc. 84350[/snapback] Boo. SLP apologist tbh. manc-mag out!

Boo. SLP out!

My major concern about Fat Fred not acting right now is that it isn't only because he is anxious about the money but also that he is unwilling to accept that he made a string of terrible decisions. He probably really thinks that he can still be proven right by sticking with the tosser.

Not sure why you're having a pop to be fair. 84229[/snapback] It's a cliquey-thing. And as I am Jorman I always do what others do ... and you're nearly as annoying as Graeme S.

Now THAT is a title for a crap song ... or jingle. 84213[/snapback] CLIQUE tbh 84218[/snapback] Genuinely jealous tbh. 84224[/snapback] He should have a look at www.dramaqueen-online.com. There he probably would find his only little clique. I heard the tosser and his friend Hansen are already registered there...

But you aren't ignoring his posts at all. If you did it wouldn't drag on and on.

Now THAT is a title for a crap song ... or jingle.