Ted Maul

He's proved this year he'll never be a consistant, top centre back. No more chances, just get rid.

Did Steve Harmison's doctor tell you that aswell?

No, I live in the Indian subcontinent

Bit of an overstatement tbh. There's barely a Newcastle fan that wouldn't have named Parker as our best player last season so no I don't think it's an overstatement at all. Though I'm sure you'll disagree. I wouldn't have named him our best player last season. I've never rated Parker and never will. I really don't see why everyone wanks themselves stupid over him for. Parker's a good player imo. I don't really see that that's in question. What I'm more concerned about is what works as a partnership, but I can't understand anyone trying to claim Parker is a poor player, because he just isn't. My personal view of Parker is that he does alot but with very little end product. I'm impressed with the way he throws himself into tackles but it annoys me when he either turns on the ball and passes it back to the other side or runs a few yards and takes a wild shot at goal. Oh, and he runs like a knob too. I think Emre is potentially a bigger asset to the side than Parker because he creates much more. Alongside Parker he's not at his best but alongside Butt he looks much more confident. We need someone to ping the balls forward to Dyer and Martins, Emre can do that.

Whats the chances of 25 of them, pilled off their knappas, banging out some shitty New Monkey on their phones while bopping about underneath these big pink fuckers?

Bit of an overstatement tbh. There's barely a Newcastle fan that wouldn't have named Parker as our best player last season so no I don't think it's an overstatement at all. Though I'm sure you'll disagree. I wouldn't have named him our best player last season. I've never rated Parker and never will. I really don't see why everyone wanks themselves stupid over him for.

Dont drink? There's always one loser isn't there... More of a loser if you can't have fun without drinking heavily, to be honest. Oi, J69. Sit down!

I've started to relisten to the earlier ones. They're comedy gold

disgracefull comment tbh!! Parker didn't have a great game yesterday and went off injured, very good player who gives us everything he's got and then some most of the time and imo our joint best player with Given atm!! People seem to mistake giving everything for class.

It's windy, cloudy and humid. Looks like a storm's acoming

Damien Rice - 9 Crimes Fooking class.

Clearly, as he told you. GREAT doctor. 3 or 4 years later. yes. You don't half talk some shite marra I bet you drink and take smack aswell!

The way Parker plays has a detrimental effect on whoever's beside him. As I was saying to one of the lads at work today i'd much rather have Butt and Emre partnering each other at this current moment in time.

I got up to where it said 'HTT' and gave up.

I really don't mind people with a little bit of flab here and there but when people get like this... ...that's when I want to run over and start lacing into their flaps of fat and call them every name under the sun.

Apparently the Australian media have already been knocking him for his decision, they'll lynch him if we manage to draw this test.

Thunder storms forecast for tomorrow afternoon in Brisbane according to SSN. If the weatherman has got it right then it looks like Ponting's decision not to enforce the follow on could be costly.

Hello, you

Doesn't Harmy have a reputation for getting homesick?

Which begs the question why the fuck wasn't Panesar chosen. We're relying far too much on our tail end being good with the bat. KP and Freddie are meant to be two of the best batsman in the world but Fletcher isn't confident enough in them to put a specialist bowler like Panesar in for fear of losing 10-20 runs. I personally reckon if we had Monty in we'd only have been aiming for a score in the mid to high 400s rather than 600+. I think it's difficult to know how Monty would have performed in his first Ashes test. Plus it was our pace attack that won us the last Ashes, not the spinners. They've failed to perform and look at the result. I agree it's difficult to know how he'd perform but he's arguably our best bowler but because he's not capable with bat and in the field he's been overlooked, that's what annoys me.

aka 50 Cent

Where did he get that photo of me from?

Which begs the question why the fuck wasn't Panesar chosen. We're relying far too much on our tail end being good with the bat. KP and Freddie are meant to be two of the best batsman in the world but Fletcher isn't confident enough in them to put a specialist bowler like Panesar in for fear of losing 10-20 runs. I personally reckon if we had Monty in we'd only have been aiming for a score in the mid to high 400s rather than 600+.

Amen

Fake tbh