Meenzer

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8339647.stm Good.

They're Turkish. Truly, God's chosen people singing in God's chosen language.

Seek comfort therein.

Inspired by alex's post earlier today, to the "tune" of Jimmy Nail's "Ain't No Doubt": He says: "I'll accept a reasonable bid that's broadly consistent with my asking price range" He's lying "I'll put an additional £20m into the club this week" He's lying "Keegan has the final say on all incoming transfers and loan signings" Why does he pretaay-ayyy-ayyyyyynd? Should catch on in a flash.

http://www.vhemt.org/ It's all sustainable.

Is this not the problem in the first place?

I'd have said "How long it would take to prise off your fingernails one by one" and see if that shut her up.

"at least 2 months" as of mid September - so most likely Decemberish He'll be sold in Jan. Playing for Palace at SJP counts as being "back", doesn't it?

I suppose there's a certain amount of overlap in the funny/laughable/pathetic Venn diagram.

I told you to keep away from the Facebook Fuglies thread I couldn't resist.

A stonking erection.

"Ghoulish"! Marvellous.

To paraphrase DJ Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince, "click click click click BOOM!".

Some cracking retro stuff on the red button on BBC at the minute, by the way - "title deciders" is the theme.

I'm reliably assured that there's a significant group of men who are Into That Kind Of Thing. I didn't bother to find out. A couple of years without meaningful sex until I decided it was time to trim the fat seemed preferable to the prospect of a whole life being pursued by bearded bears.

That's the other big gay lie, the idea that there are strictly defined roles. I'm sure some people feel that way, particularly with regard to casual sex, but if you're into the idea of having a healthy and varied sex life with one person in particular then you'll be into most ideas that come your way. We're not that different to you lot really.

I like Trulli, but he's acting like a fucking idiot over this one.

I bet you do, I bet you do. It's a fair enough question actually. Sometimes it's obvious from behavioural cues - more effiminate gay men are often (though by no means exclusively) "bottoms", and vice versa. Sometimes you have to ask outright (directly or otherwise), which I imagine is one reason why gay men in particular are much more forward in seduction terms than their straight counterparts - no point in wasting your time pursuing someone over the course of an evening only to find that you're incompatible, after all. Plus there's an awful lot of gays who aren't into bumsex at all and are quite happy to settle for an expertly delivered blowjob. Since you ask. But yeah, I suppose there are times when you don't know until you actually get down to it. Hankie codes aren't as common as you might think, despite the flagrant behaviour of some of the Trent meetup regulars over the years.

Worst ones for abusing fat fuckas. Just like the closet cases are the ones who fire out the most vicious homophobic abuse, eh?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8327753.stm I'd be the first to admit I have inherent flashes of prejudice whenever I see someone grossly overweight, despite being a former fattie myself (albeit never properly obese), and I do find incidents like the one described to be fundamentally deplorable, but the attitude of the victim and the other people quoted in the article - i.e. repeatedly insinuating that the only reason fat people get abused is because the offenders are permanent dieters who hate anyone who isn't on a steady daily intake of porridge, soup and raw vegetables - is utterly pathetic. But that might just be me. Is it?

What camera did you use ? The one... in my mind.

Taken in the Harburg branch of Karstadt. Fact!

38. Most notable miss was .

Everyone, yawn and look bored when you see the 273rd posthumous 2Pac album.

Thanks Nick We'll save the planet by sending the buggers back. ....to Neptune!