BigWalrus

If Remy only has half an hour in him, it's pointless bringing him on now as we'll need to take him off again later on. Strikers aren't the problem at the minute. The issue is the lack of support from midfield. We need more bodies forward when we've got the ball near their box.

Aye, either that or rubbing the inside of a banana skin on your bell end in public.

Bonjela helps numb it a bit, but I've never found it helps get rid any quicker. Red wine seems to boost my chances of getting mouth ulcers about 10 fold.

Aye I know, who even uses google to find porn anyway?

I better get building my porn archive. Need to have a lifetime supply ready and waiting for when the big switch off comes!

A wise man once told me, "all you need is three inches - one in, one out and one going in and out"

And he drinks beer. Regularly.

Old I know, but it never gets tired:

Married and have separate accounts. However, we both know each others online passwords to log on and transfer money between the two, and most of our spending is done on a shared credit card, so it's effectively shared.

Sports Biscuits are canny for simplicity and dunking.

I'm sick of the "Cisse is always offside" quip. His entire game is based around playing on the shoulder of the last man. I'm surprised he isn't ruled offside more often.

Rumoured swap deals are guaranteed to be complete and utter bollocks.

Snap.

People wrongly assume. If he thinks there's no hope of recouping his losses and his cash can be better invested elsewhere, he would be more than happy to pull out at a loss.

My view is that the debt to Ashley is effectively part of his purchase price. I can't remember the exact figures offhand, but let's say he paid £100m to S&H and then immediately paid off £140m of the Barclays loan. If S & H had paid the loan off themselves prior to selling, the purchase price would then have been £100m + £140m = £240m, except the whole lot would have been equity. Ashley will almost certainly view the loan repayment as part of his original consideration, regardless of what the accounting treatment is.

As sole shareholder, his loans are bottom of the chain when it comes to preference. Previously, the Barclays loans were secured on the stadium, meaning the club was at risk if repayment didn't take place. From a going concern standpoint, the current position is hugely preferable.

That's your opinion, but I don't agree. We were technically insolvent before Ashley bought us. If Shepherd had stayed in charge we were facing almost certain administration.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23078746

Doesn't make any difference whatsoever. If he hadn't paid the loan off, any buyer would pay £x but know that they're also inheriting a whopping big debt. With the debt being wholly MA's, there's room for negotiation with any buyer. Let's be honest, if a buyer can't afford to pay the loan off in one go, they probably shouldn't be looking to buy a PL club. Make no mistake, NUFC is in a far stronger financial position from not having the massive Barclays loan.

Can't argue with any of that.

Meh.

Still to be confirmed by NUFC. I live in hope that Kinnear was just giving an interview on the way to be sectioned.

Bizarre decision. Can't quite get my head around it. And to think I thought Ashley was beginning to learn!

Look closely - it has no ballsack, which is even more disturbing

Aye I agree. Regardless of what anyone thinks about the idea of purple players, Cabaye is proper, unquestionable purple.