Craig

Where's that Graeme got to ? 104291[/snapback] You blaming this one on Souness then? Tell me LM, if he gets time for assault, and lets face it, this is hardly the first time he's been involved in something like this, are you still going to maintain we should have kept him?

Angelic Craig Bellamy in trouble with the law?? Surely not!

Cue posts from the usual suspects who'll claim Owen has replaced Shearer, not Bellamy! 103491[/snapback] Owen - Out and out goalscorer/striker Shearer - Out and out goalscorer/striker Bellamy - Support striker to an out and out goalscorer type You can tell me where I'm wrong and we can have a debate about it, or is it going to be a silly one-liner? I'm open to alternative opinions Craig, I know I may not be right but this is what I believe as I sit here right now. Convince me I'm wrong. 103714[/snapback] Shearer is still here, Bellamy is not. I think it's fairly self explanatory who he was bought to replace! So if we buy a striker of the Shearer mould this summer, are you going to claim he's a replacement for Bellamy?? 103862[/snapback] Hope in your job you have nowt to do with forward planning. 104038[/snapback] Plenty to do with forward planning - still doesn't make Owen Shearer's replacement...

Only thing that jumps out at me is that we'll both have caretaker managers - wonder when the last Tyne/Wear derby had that (if at all). Don't think there's any history between the two. Roeder had moved to Watford by the time the Mackems had signed Ball and the only 'needle' I remember in a game where they were both involved is when we played Pompey in 1987 but that was Peter Jackson and Kevin Dillon having a ding-dong, nowt to do with Roeder and Ball...

You dirty old man! Travel safe! 103659[/snapback] What's that in his hands? 103661[/snapback] If it's the episode I think it is, it's a brillo pad!

Aye, but you're nearly 17 so it doesn't bother you anyway!

Remake of 'Hunchback of Notre Dame' tbh!

Cue posts from the usual suspects who'll claim Owen has replaced Shearer, not Bellamy! 103491[/snapback] Owen - Out and out goalscorer/striker Shearer - Out and out goalscorer/striker Bellamy - Support striker to an out and out goalscorer type You can tell me where I'm wrong and we can have a debate about it, or is it going to be a silly one-liner? I'm open to alternative opinions Craig, I know I may not be right but this is what I believe as I sit here right now. Convince me I'm wrong. 103714[/snapback] Shearer is still here, Bellamy is not. I think it's fairly self explanatory who he was bought to replace! So if we buy a striker of the Shearer mould this summer, are you going to claim he's a replacement for Bellamy??

They should increase the ban for having the audacity to challenge the decision IMO. They should introduce some sort of punishment increase for losing appeals in a similar way to how they do in F1. Would stop a hell of a lot of time wasting that's for sure.

Sunderland 'fan' according to Courtney on Talksport this morning.... Surely he won't even consider it?

Cue posts from the usual suspects who'll claim Owen has replaced Shearer, not Bellamy!

I'm going on the betting shortlist? However will I cope??

Fucking hell, can you give it a rest with the N-O obsession??

Let him Actually I think he'll agree with the most of it, he might reckon that Wallwork should have walked as well but I reckon that wasn't as bad as it was only one footed... Something has to be done about players hounding the ref though...

Drogba wants his fucking knackers lobbing off for that dive like - what the fuck, the bloke went down like he'd been shot! Finding it hard to understand why they're (Bryan Robson including) suggesting Robben's sending off was harsh. He went in with two feet off the deck, straight forward red card IMO!

35000 miles a year! Bloody hell, that would drive me mad, man. 102928[/snapback] That's about what I do as well... And it's about to get a lot worse!

And there we have it 102927[/snapback] with NO Souness lovers... 102932[/snapback] can't say we've seen any Souness lovers on here like...

The cunt* got the minimum sentence - how the hell did he manage that one?? Should have done us all a favour and put him before the firing squad (and stick Jonathan King alongside him while they're at it!!) * - I appreciate this word offends people, but I can't think of anything else that is appropriate to describe that scum!

what the fuck do you mean by that?

It was indeed my idea... Although others (including Gol) though it was a good idea!

...if you're going to photograph something you're going to sell on ebay, remember to be dressed when taking the picture....

J69 is a soopanurse though - goes to all the resuscitations!

He'll be claiming he wasn't boasting about how he was gonna shag Mags next 102446[/snapback] already proved that it was in fact mags who was trying to get into my pants, i notice mags and gol have gone strangely quiet on the subject since mags pms were posted 102514[/snapback] Has she?? Or has she just decided to keep it away from the forum? Jilted tbh.

Same IP range as well and he's using a different IP with each post - wonder which other poster is doing that?

He'll be claiming he wasn't boasting about how he was gonna shag Mags next