peasepud

I agree but we cant say that KKs a twat because of that. Whatever the reasons for going, he went. If it turns out that he was wrong then he should rightly get the blame for our current position. Like I say though Im fairly certain that will not be the case.

How many times have you used the word cunt in this thread? Dont stop, I like it you like cunt yes, yes I do, dont you?

I disagree. I think he might have considered it were we a top half side with KK here etc. It's not like that's not his level these days, much as a I rate him still. No I honestly thought I would have a chance but since all this shit she is too worried about whats going on at NUFC to consider an affair Cheryl would love you imo. She likes Southern dark-skinned types you forgot "gay".

How many times have you used the word cunt in this thread? Dont stop, I like it

hmmmm an extract from Zahavi's wikipedia... In 2005 the English Football Association recommended that Zahavi be investigated for his part in the Ashley Cole 'tapping-up' affair. He was also present when then-England manager Sven-Göran Eriksson met with Chelsea owner Abramovich; Eriksson later issued a statement denying his meeting was for business reasons. Following the Lord Stevens 'bung enquiry', Zahavi was reported to be involved in "making illicit payments" on a deal involving Fabio Rochemback and fellow agent Barry Silkman. "Agent Pinhas Zahavi has failed to co-operate fully with the inquiry . There was an initial failure to disclose his involvement in a number of transfers but, more seriously, he has failed to provide the inquiry with complete bank statements due to the confidential nature of them. There has also been a lack of responsiveness by Zahavi. There remains questions relating to his relationship with, and payments to, licensed agent Barry Silkman, and with Silkman's failure to initially disclose his involvement in all the transactions in which he has received fees." Ahhhh good old honest football just what we need.

More than likely. Keegan: Newcastle - resigned Fulham - offered England job England - resigned Man City - contract expired Newcastle - constructively dismissed? Bruce: Sheff U - resigned Huddersfield - sacked Wigan - resigned Crystal Palace - resigned Birmingham - resigned Wigan - ? Whether he left Fulham for the England job or not he still resigned, in the same way Bruce left Birmingham to sign for Wigan. He also left Man City before his contract expired because he'd lost the dressing room, he was planning on leaving when his contract expired in the Summer though. Ahhh so resigning because you have a new job is now bottling it eh? Where did I say that? Because the conversation is about him "bottling" the jobs, thats why Dr Ken put the list up to disprove the claims however on that logic I can see that the Birmingham one wouldnt count for Bruce either.

More than likely. Keegan: Newcastle - resigned Fulham - offered England job England - resigned Man City - contract expired Newcastle - constructively dismissed? Bruce: Sheff U - resigned Huddersfield - sacked Wigan - resigned Crystal Palace - resigned Birmingham - resigned Wigan - ? Whether he left Fulham for the England job or not he still resigned, in the same way Bruce left Birmingham to sign for Wigan. He also left Man City before his contract expired because he'd lost the dressing room, he was planning on leaving when his contract expired in the Summer though. Ahhh so resigning because you have a new job is now bottling it eh?

Surely no established top billionaire businessman would be stupid enough to do that?

I hope Keegan is shown up as a quitter and all of Ashley's claims are proven correct. It won't happen, but it would be FAR better for the future of NUFC. Alternatively it all comes out that it's the other way round and Ashley's position becomes untenable which would be best for the club in the long term. There still wont be a buyer though and maybe after that they will be harder to find, would you buy a football club off a man who was proven in a court of law to have lied?

Actually I dont think it is, Appears to be int 'Uddersfield.

Meanwhile heres the Newcastle version.

I agree with the sentiment however we all know that the £8million will not be spent on players regardless. It will sit in Ashleys pocket so for that reason I would be more than happy to see KK win. Regardless however I want to see whoever is telling the truth win, that for me is more than likely to be KK therefore he deserves his cash.

Jesus wept

Do we have the only manager in the country that believes its a good idea to warn the rest of the footballing world who we are looking to buy? Do we hear Ferguson coming out and saying "Im going to buy x"? No, no we dont and why? because when Ferguson gets his eye on a player then he knows he has a chance of buying him. We have reverted back to the days when the board would make outlandish claims to be buying top players just to keep the masses happy.

Im resigned to the fact Ashley will just see him staying as a loss of money.

I don't. Me neither, there are people within the club that actually are fans, they hate whats going on as much as the rest of us.

Yeah it was but it is time though that we recognised Owen as the striker he is. Not permanently having this "he doesnt care about us and will be off" attitude, yes he will be off but anyone who thinks they can blame him for that has a screw loose in my opinion.

I know, it amazes me how much adoration Martins gets, dont get me wrong I think he can be good but frankly its a bit weird that Owen scores two and theres a few muted "one Michael Owen" chants drowned out by "Oba Oba Fe" to be honest I think its because as fans we havent got the nous anymore to come up with chants and songs, so people end up looking for reasons to sing the same old shite.

Nope I'll give him this one, Ashley doesnt appear (yet) to be down at this twats level.

Not just ball "people" but doing everything you can as a club to win games. I've moaned about this before but today I think it will be extra noticeable. Our ball balls are crap, they are basically kids whos parents pay for the priviledge of having little Dwayne or Tanya sitting at the side of a freezing cold pitch and making a tit of themselves if the ball comes near. Balls go out for a corner and some kid gets it then passes it to Given, goes for a throw in and (as was witnessed last season) some 14 year lass in huge hoop earings totters over gets it and then giddily walks it over to Given and hands him it. A few times Ive witnessed Given having to go running and vaulting over the hoardings to retrieve the ball himself, how much would that cost us if he broke his leg???? No attempt to keep the game moving when we so often need it to and more importantly no spoiling tactics with the opposition. Seemingly Boltons kids were told not to wipe the ball dry before giving it to Delap at throw in time. Man U's will regularly take their time collecting the ball and have been seen to comically drop it at the last second before giving it to the opposition. All things that in a multi million pound business such as this we should be doing. I say (yet again) that we stop this pointless money making scheme and employ the juniors to be proper ball boys, know what they're doing, recognise who needs the ball and where, it should be placed on the corner spot ready for a player to take the corner. It should be thrown directly to a player for a throw in, nice and clean and dry for our players, wet and slippy for the opposition. As for other things, seemingly Man U moved their advertising hordings in for the Stoke game to stop Delap getting a good run, Bolton had players warming up behind him to put him off, we will probably remove the first two rows of seats to give him extra room Rant over, take heed of what I say today, just watch what happens every time the ball goes out of play.

I can hardly bring myself to believe anything he says, good or bad My view is he makes up what he thinks we want to hear and dumbs down the bad news, this statement basically means in real terms that the entire first team, reserves, juniors and catering staff have thrown transfer requests in.

I think it's a goal kick if it goes in directly. totally off topic, I think 2Js just nearly slipped outside my kitchen window! if it wasnt him then hes got an Adidas clad double!

0 - 3 Delap to get a hat trick with his hands. Serious question, (highly unlikely to happen I know) but does it stand if he throws it directly in without touching anyone? Or is a throw in the equivalent of an indirect free kick?

Jesus wept. Why is it that I never believe a word the bloke says when its positive but know its true when he talks the opposite?