Mac-Toon

David Schwimmers dead?

They'll set off with good intentions but we should have more than enough to kill them off by half time. Expect Ferguson to grab at least 3.

Pissing myself at the 'obsessed' crack. It's a passive comment but I can sense the agression hidden underneath it. I've know doubt if Leazes ever met you's in a bar on the off chance he'd be takin' his jacket off and removing the watch. Beer sunk and offering yous outside whilst you's laugh and shout things about Souness.

Inherited an ailing shite squad who didn't play for him. They should be ashamed of themselves, to a man. Hope Dagleish goes and they crash and burn.

So , did you pick me then ?? No. Women generally have shite taste in music anyway, I was thinking about blokes. If you're under 25 and like KOL fair enough you're young impressionable, you're just forming your personality and the media influences you. If you're over 25 and still like them oh dear. It's personality deficiency disorder, you have little opinions on life and are a generic nobhead who holds no real views and opinions of your own. I really believe that, based on how utterly shite they are. A fuckin' love yee like. Cheered me up no end reading that after a thoroughly wankstain of a day at graft.

So you're going to ignore all the advice about the red light district then! I meant with my woman. ... She said she'll come in with me.

I'm most certainly upper class, daaahlings. Actually, am I fuck. Working class salt of the earth Geordie upbringing.

Fifa 11 is 59p. Absolute bargain. Stick Cricket's unreal aswell.

Flights all booked this morning. Go early February, the 5th actually so going to miss the Arsenal game. Can't wait to fuck off for a few days, child free aswell. May even get my annual

I've been watching a series called 'Still Game'. Two actors wo made it are Ford Kiernan and Greg Hemphill. Set in Scotland, it's about too old codgers who are, as the title states 'Still game'. It's fucking hilarious.

They don't like The Flinstones in Iraq. But in abidhabi the do.

Typical, bet you need it now tonight? And you need it more than ever?

And that they have lied in the past which means even if Pardew says he's staying, no-one believes it. I dont blame anyone for that either. Thnking back, part of the KK saga was 'them' trying to communicate by proxy (before it went to shit). ... by lying.

come on then lad....meat on the bones Just something I heard from Twitter. Will see what else I can find out It's on the back page of the journal in his aftermatch comments last night. Saying along the lines of 'We're short of bodies and looking to strengthen ahead of the weekend'

Common sense at last. I would be interested if PP would link to these so called statements saying we were going to buy young future stars and then sell them when they come good. I can't recall it. Your selective memory is unlikely to tbf. I'll hunt them out but they refer to the purchasing criteria that Llambias drew up which clearly referred to future resale value. I look forward to seeing said club statements. Likewise, I look forward to seeing those to contrary. .... Baited breath. Pleased you said that, I think Bob must have me on ignore or something. Why are people believing club statements anyway. Take for example Hughtons vote of confidence, Derek Llambias saying 'Shearer was the best decision they made' etc etc

Common sense at last. I would be interested if PP would link to these so called statements saying we were going to buy young future stars and then sell them when they come good. I can't recall it. Your selective memory is unlikely to tbf. I'll hunt them out but they refer to the purchasing criteria that Llambias drew up which clearly referred to future resale value. I look forward to seeing said club statements. Likewise, I look forward to seeing those to contrary. .... Baited breath.

Common sense at last. I would be interested if PP would link to these so called statements saying we were going to buy young future stars and then sell them when they come good. I can't recall it. Well, where are the statements and actions to back up what Brazilian Bob's saying? Edit: Plus, he didn't say what the statements were, he basically said 'Brazilian Bobs perception doesn't fit with that of the club'

That may be your perception however it doesnt fit in with the statements made previously by the club. As Ive said earlier you cant impose a tight wage cap and expect to hold onto players that other clubs are valuing at £20m. That is why we would sell him. Should that not be that it does not fit with your perception of statements made previously by the club? Well you're going on your perception of statements made by the club. In fairness to PP, there's more evidence to be a non believer than a sympathiser like yourself. I'm not going to get into a argument over this because it is patently obvious I am right, some of you clearly subscribe to the chinese whispers interpretation of club statements, so believe what you like pal ok! To who? You? What are you right about? It's not an argument flower, it's a discussion. What you believe is that our policy is to groom youngsters and if they don't make the grade ship them out to lesser clubs? That's an unwritten policy at every club throughout the land, patently. On the flipside, anyone who we groom and makes the grade and attracts offers from bigger clubs then I've no doubt in my mind that he'd cash in if the price is right. If someone bids £30m for Carroll he'll be gone. No if's, no but's, he'll be gone. To place Ashley as some footballing mastermind who'll sacrifice his own pocket to build a successful club is laughable to be honest.

That may be your perception however it doesnt fit in with the statements made previously by the club. As Ive said earlier you cant impose a tight wage cap and expect to hold onto players that other clubs are valuing at £20m. That is why we would sell him. Should that not be that it does not fit with your perception of statements made previously by the club? Well you're going on your perception of statements made by the club. In fairness to PP, there's more evidence to be a non believer than a sympathiser like yourself.

link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here and don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at? You won't know what I'm laughing at like, being new on here. Am I echoing the sentiments of another TT member? For the record, I didn't like Souness but the point about backing your man is valid. Aye, Leazes. Then he's right. A board I'd like to see is one of conviction who will back whoever they have in charge and bullet a manger who they don't fancy. Not keep a manager they don't want and not back him. He is, aye. Don't see how he can have a pop at Gemmill for having virtually the same view though. Even worse when it's been gone over about 500 times at least since then. Not having a pop at you or owt. That's where my confusion lies. It seems that their view is the same. Gemmill saying he should be back as he was FFS man and Leazes saying the same bar he should've been sacked sooner.

link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here and don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at? You won't know what I'm laughing at like, being new on here. Am I echoing the sentiments of another TT member? For the record, I didn't like Souness but the point about backing your man is valid. Aye, Leazes. Then he's right. A board I'd like to see is one of conviction who will back whoever they have in charge and bullet a manger who they don't fancy. Not keep a manager they don't want and not back him.

link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here and don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at? You won't know what I'm laughing at like, being new on here. Am I echoing the sentiments of another TT member? For the record, I didn't like Souness but the point about backing your man is valid.

link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here and don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at? you'll have to ask him that, he didn't say this at the time, he just said he should be allowed to build his team despite letting valuable assets go for next to nowt and buying inferior replacements for a fortune. Anybody could tell you that in an accountants world, that can't continue. In a footballing sense, you back your man that you appoint as best you can until it is obvious he is not doing the job successfully anymore or is showing himself to be the wrong man, yes I agree completely. Unfortunately, Souness showed he was the wrong man long before the end and should suitably have been sacked long before he was. Fully agree. I just expect a board to back whoever they have as their manager. Souness was awful for us and was deservedly booted out. I wouldn't have given him a penny to spend, but as Shepherds man he should've been supplied with the bucks to improve the squad. That's on a simplistic level, obviously.

link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here and don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at?

Pardew said this last night: "Like all strikers and players from the Championship there’s sometimes a snobbish opinion that they’re not going to be good enough and as Charlie Adams proved at Blackpool and Leon has tonight that there are players in that division who can play at this level if they have the belief." That to me says we're going to continue signing championship players. Obviously got our eyes set on the dizzy heights of the europa league.