Dazzler

The unfunny one from the Hebburn series years ago and his even less funny missus. Comedy for housewives, so in 2024 it’s comedy for no one.

Both of them are comedic geniuses compared to the Ramsey’s who were both on as “celebrity” guests. They also ruined a Scottish woman’s (who I believe was terminally ill) evening twice because they are both thick as whale spunk. The Jock wife absolutely idolised them too and strummed herself to their podcast. I reckon them days are done now

That would be fair, in the truest sense of the word - which is exactly why it would never be afforded to us. This whole thing is about stopping the gate crashers not enabling them. How dare Nottingham Forest and Villa (both objectively and historically bigger clubs than Spurs) show a shred of ambition - and don't get me started on those state owned bastards in the north east.

Because they desperately need the rule to not be applied retrospectively. Which this vote kind of sorted (albeit temporarily - and could easily be reversed by the tribunal anyway).

Brighton are probably going to struggle too, they owe £300m+ in shareholder loans. This is the one that fucks me off. They got to "do us a favour" by taking a promising youngster off our hands and help us beat a points deduction and were only able to do that because their owner has funded them interest free. Brighton wouldn't even be in this league had the loans been fairly treated from day dot.

Aye, but only the 11 pages so it's not like a big deal or anything.

Mentally disabled is the answer you're looking for, marra.

I don't think it is, because effectively all of them have had the benefit of those loans already - either the loans replaced external debt saving them X% in interest charges or they used those 0% loans to fund infrastructure improvements. Their PSR calcs were improved by those loans in many cases, which by their very existence makes them unfair. If the point of the tribunal is that it was illegal to exclude the loans, I don't think amending the rules to only include future shareholder loans will pass the sniff test, personally. I still think there is scope that the interest charges could be back dated which fucks quite a few of the clubs that have them.

We already have it:

The poor parent getting it in the head when he’s “fed up with briiiiiiick”

Tell that to all of the women who loved a bit of sausage until you turned up with a flip pad full of home made pie charts.

So turn complete gay rather than the standard repulsion? Sounds about right tbf.

Properly LTAdYP

Sounds like something the birds do whilst us men are spending our wages down the labour club.

Russell Brand is looking rough.

She doesn’t help herself when it comes to people calling her thick