Jump to content

Paolo Di Canio Hounded out by the mackems


Tooj
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 852
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If Mincer is genuine, he'll have no problem posting the following, word for word,

" I , Mincepie, am not a six fingered, sister-fucking, inbred, mouthbreathing, sad mackem bastard"

Will he :lol:

Bump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laughing at people with nothing to say or posting blind idiocy makes someone a macken does it?

 

I said it was a bad appointment - explained why - and you didn't respond. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mincer is genuine, he'll have no problem posting the following, word for word,

" I , Mincepie, am not a six fingered, sister-fucking, inbred, mouthbreathing, sad mackem bastard"

Will he :lol:

That's the first time somebody has ever called me a mackem Monkey Brain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to football focus Di Canio is going to play 4-2-4.

 

You're not Brazil. It's not the 50's.

 

With what attacking force? Wickham who could only score once in Championship, Graham who hasn't hit the target yet, Sessegnon/Johnson who seem to have shut down.

 

Play that against us :wank:

Edited by loonyTOON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah and that's what I've read about him. 442 one inverted winger, one full back one wingback - very direct.

 

But they definitely said 424 which is why it was worthy of mentioning I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm feeling a bit supportive of Di Canio which is a bizarre feeling given my hatred for the team he's managing.

 

Maybe it's just an underdog thing following the political kicking he's had.

 

Naturally I wish him no good will against us and hope he soon does / says something which will diminish my supportive nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm feeling a bit supportive of Di Canio which is a bizarre feeling given my hatred for the team he's managing.

 

Maybe it's just an underdog thing following the political kicking he's had.

 

Naturally I wish him no good will against us and hope he soon does / says something which will diminish my supportive nature.

Or it's because you're contrary? ;)

Edited by The Fish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.