Gemmill 35203 Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 Just to be clear though, you understood the complex ranking system and didn't for a second think I intended to murder them all with a gun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 3989 Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 Yeah the gun was obviously coercive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14118 Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 Hang on, is that what you think we think you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4964 Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 (edited) Just to be clear though, you understood the complex ranking system and didn't for a second think I intended to murder them all with a gun? That ranking system was utter balls and entirely counter intuitive. I thought the exact same thing as Ant, and it took me a long time to work out why anyone would come up with a system that superfluously created an entire second set of assumptions (i.e. they had an obvious order, which you initially used in order to assign priority, and then abandoned to convey your preference, choosing instead an entirely different ordering system for no reason whatsoever). Even describing it makes no sense Edited December 18, 2015 by Rayvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catmag 336 Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 "Let's take this slowly" "urrr durrrrr but I fort you waz holdin dem at gunpoint" Good lad NJS, I'm glad there's at least one more intelligent bloke on here. Yes, because that's exactly how I sound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2188 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 That ranking system was utter balls and entirely counter intuitive. I thought the exact same thing as Ant, and it took me a long time to work out why anyone would come up with a system that superfluously created an entire second set of assumptions (i.e. they had an obvious order, which you initially used in order to assign priority, and then abandoned to convey your preference, choosing instead an entirely different ordering system for no reason whatsoever). Even describing it makes no sense I agree. The system was utter balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 38990 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 rankergate Typo? Because, let's be generous here, the Ginger Ninja was obviously typing out his preference list one- handed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 38990 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Are a couple of these lasses the same as the ones who were in that photo from a few years ago? All in fancy dress in the freezing bastard cold. And, to answer this, no. This is a whole new level of Bushpiggery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 12836 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 I would suggest that Gemmill's performance over the last two pages was terrible, shambolic, in fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17962 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 (edited) Rayvin's spot on. Took me a while to even understand Gemmill's system, and even now I have to do mental gymnastics to translate it. Utterly shambolic performance. Edited December 19, 2015 by Renton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 35203 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 The more of you morons that disagree with me, the more right I feel. Please keep them coming. Your subservience to the moderator team is second only to your stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6025 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Sorry to go all contrary tree but I knew what he meant immediately. Likely cos I'm a pervert that subconsciously puts every female I meet into a yes/no pile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 35203 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Another member of the Toontastic Elite Club. Could we have a private forum please, where we can discuss things without having to constantly explain them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 35203 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Just for if we need to discuss basic concepts that will be beyond the rest of you. Like simple number tasks and rankings. You all understand how the league table works, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17962 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Sorry to go all contrary tree but I knew what he meant immediately. Likely cos I'm a pervert that subconsciously puts every female I meet into a yes/no pile All men are a bit like that though, if they have a libido. It doesn't explain the need to devise a retarded system like that when it clearly makes much more sense to rank them according to the picture, so you can visually see it without the need for further calculation. Btw, am a bit surprised with you anyway J69, what with you being so right on and quick to label everyone as some kind of "ist", that you're so happy to objectify women in this way. Just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 12836 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 I didn't even read the last two pages, I just wanted to stick the boot in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6025 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 All men are a bit like that though, if they have a libido. It doesn't explain the need to devise a retarded system like that when it clearly makes much more sense to rank them according to the picture, so you can visually see it without the need for further calculation. Btw, am a bit surprised with you anyway J69, what with you being so right on and quick to label everyone as some kind of "ist", that you're so happy to objectify women in this way. Just saying. Having safe consensual sex with lots of ladies = fine Hating Muslims = not fine I might write a guide to life one day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 27337 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Having safe consensual sex with lots of ladies = Hating Muslims = I might write a guide to life one day J69'dYP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6025 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Much better thanks x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17962 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Having safe consensual sex with lots of ladies = fine Hating Muslims = not fine I might write a guide to life one day You've entirely missed my point, which is your happy to objectify woman and rate their sexual desirability (including strangers on the internet), which is canny sexist really, but you have the most right on politically correct persona going. It's hypocritical. But how the holy fuck is having safe consensual sex relevant to anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 27337 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 (edited) Well it's not relevant to rating strangers on how much you'd shag them, it IS relevant to not catching STDs or getting arrested for rape, however. Edited December 19, 2015 by Howmanheyman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6025 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Exactly, can you miss anymore points in this thread Renton. GOD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19967 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 (edited) There isn't a straight man with a cock that doesn't objectify women. Some might not like to admit it but deep down, we all do it, whether it's in the safety of our own mind or on a public forum. Edited December 19, 2015 by Dr Gloom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 12836 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 There isn't a straight man with a cock that doesn't objectify women. Some might not like to admit it but deep down, we all do it, whether it's in the safety of our own mind or on a public forum. aye, it's a constant struggle that we don't get enough credit for battling. The growing understanding that we should be more aware of women's issues versus absent mindedly staring at their arses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17962 Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 aye, it's a constant struggle that we don't get enough credit for battling. The growing understanding that we should be more aware of women's issues versus absent mindedly staring at their arses. I once had a job interview with a beautiful woman with the most magnificent chebs ever. It wasn't until after the interview I realised I had been staring at them the entire time. I didn't get the job. You wouldn't catch me rating the desirability of women on the internet though, and hypothetically working out which one I'd do at gun point first, oh no...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now