Dazzler

Where have I heard this before? Oh that's right, another absolute bellend already tried to pull this one. Ferguson: RVP "Could Have Been Killed" | Scoop News | Sky News

Hasbulla is looking well in the background, mind.

Here man officer ah was just tekkin me hoose forra wairk.

Mother dear, after we’ve eaten our pheasant may we ask the driver to take us up to Waitrose for some kets? I'm not having it. It’s not on.

There's an overhyped boxing event on this evening and you haven't even given us a load of unnecessary posts about it, what's the craic?

Staveley commenting on cabbage heed

My dad says kets and bullets for sweets as well and he is from Elswick - so am I like, but I only ever said kets. My dad also uses gypsy slang a lot so a dog is a juggle, a horse is a gallowah, monkeys are jakeys etc.

That's how it works for most asset sales, so I can't see it being any different tbh. Unless there is some specialist accounting treatment used in football that would differ. Effectively the difference between the net book value and proceeds of the sale is written off to the P&L at the point the sale is finalised - so a player with a NBV of £90m being sold for £40m would lead to a £50m hit in that year's accounts - . Which makes their approach even more stupid when you think about it as it was hinging on immediate success and/or somehow the value of these players (which were already inflated) increasing. They are quite literally going to be stuck with these players until the NBV is at a point it's worth selling for a lower fee which will be years down the line.

That's a shit hero name. You'll never get a comic named after you at this rate.

I think it's the pain of any dad with daughters tbf. It'll be sound, kids are all the same deep down - but are they fuck. You just end up with a clone of the mam and get ganged up on - but also gain a shadow that says hilarious and often quite offensive things about the appearance of someone stood in front of you in a queue at Sainsbury's.

That's what I said when we were having the second. Then we had a daughter and you realise that as a man you are so fucking out of your depth it's unreal. It would be so much easier bollocking two brothers who are kicking the shit out of each other on a daily basis. I'm lucky if I get a full sentence out of my son each day - he's much more my sort of people. That being said my daughter is fucking hilarious, and has zero filter. She's like one of the kids from that film Mama - a fucking caveman in a little girl's body

See my previous post - I did this exact thing (not on the same day like)

We had one of each so it became easier to agree on that being it. I was then instructed to get the snip which I had no issue with whatsoever, as I was fully done with having more kids . But even that doesn't stop the "I wish we'd had another one" coming up every once in a while, but it's fairly easily shot down with a bit of gentle gaslighting "well you shouldn't have made me get the snip then should you?"

If they haven't had an argument over who's idea it was to even have a second kid within 2 years of their birth then they are definitely going to be stupid and have a third

Never finished Tsushima - I did enjoy it though and have it on the PS plus membership so can pick it back up whenever I fancy it. I have AC Mirage on the go at the minute, so far so good - not as good as Odyssey but definitely better than Valhalla. Not long finished Death Stranding which was a fucking masterpiece filled with Kojima weirdness and the ending nearly fucking killed me.

It would have to have been c-section at 10lbs. She'd be in a wheelchair now if it wasn't Good luck with the bairn though, it'll turn out to be worry over nothing I'm sure and I can't see them saying anything other than that which is what's best for the baby and your wife.

Nah that cunt probably thinks we should abolish the government as they're all the same, and we can all live hand in hand in a Mad Max style utopia.

This is the bit I am not certain of (due to not working in football) - the standard process for selling an asset would be that the £50m would be written off in the year you sold them as you can't depreciate an asset you no longer own. There may be different accounting procedures in football that means you can still amortise the fees even after a player is sold though but it seems to be an odd one as you'd be recognising a physical asset (a player) that now also sits on the balance sheet of another club. In my plant and machinery brain it goes: Purchase for £100m - Fixed Assets depreciated over five years (assuming the limit is applied retroactively) Depreciation - £40m - Assuming the player has been with the club for two full seasons at point of sale. NBV - £60m after two seasons Transfer fee £40m - That leaves a balance on the fixed assets of £20m and this would be written off at the point of sale to the P&L as one hit. I suppose in the above example at the start of year three it's cost neutral (from an accounting perspective) as you're going to amortise that £20m anyway, so suddenly £40m isn't so bad and after year 3 starts to actually become profitable in the P&L - if the amortisation limit is not applied retroactively then Chelsea are stuck with these players for much longer before it becomes even close to viable to sell for realistic fees.

In player sales, do the accounting entries not work as they would selling any other asset? E.g. Profit/Sale of asset - so the amortisation would cease at the point the sale is recognised in the accounts as the value is written off the balance sheet. I suppose the above only works with players purchased within the last five years, which Chelsea will find increasingly difficult to do, given the inflated fees and contracts they've dished out. I'd say they have a tonne of kids on their books that could fetch upwards of £5m each though, which seems like it's never ending - similarly with Man City. They will always need a handful of those to fetch £20m-£30m+, and unless they start bringing some through they could be royally fucked in a year or two. They have (I would think) five years at around £200m in amortisation costs just from the Boehly spunkfest to cover.