Dazzler
-
Posts
6054 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
45
Everything posted by Dazzler
-
Bailey has changed the game for them. He's been class since he come on and got Burn on strings. It's a shame like coz Burn had been class up to that sub. -
We've got another Miley, Joe White and some young Man City kid we've yet to announce - none of whom Howe will play What will be fun is when Bruno gets a straight red (which he's overdue IMO) and we're fucked for three games instead of the two he'll get for picking up a yellow.
-
They only have so much time in a single day. Aside from bribing low level people within the sport they also have to murder journalists, treat women to the occasional stoning and throw the LGBT community off roofs. They do this every day, with zero exceptions. There's just no time to bribe the PL, UEFA and FIFA to turn a blind eye to our dodgy FFP deeds.
-
So then I can presume one of the following is true 1) You either have the stretchiest trousers in the world to be split that far at the ankles without tearing or; 2) You wear pants with a trap door
-
"Or did they both?" This misses the distinct and most likely possibility that both clubs are losers here.
-
Which situation is correct? 1) You shit straight into your pants. 2) You remove your foot from one pant leg and strategically place the pants to the outside of the other leg and shit straight onto the grass 3) You have a particularly high arsehole so when you shite it shoots away from you at a 90 degree angle clearing the dropped trousers (and hitting the piss police like a poo missile)
-
-
But there are people that will still confidently claim that FFP isn't real and that the owners have failed badly
-
At this point the Sunderland 'model' is more like the 'model' in that Netflix documentary who murdered kittens by putting them in vacuum bags than it is an actual business model.
-
He gets away with it because he immediately stands up and wipes his crack with a dock leaf. So they think he's mentally deficient.
- 1265 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- News
- ridiculous
- (and 5 more)
-
It's the people employed to catch them I feel sorry for. Imagine having to stash yourself in the bushes on the dales and wait for someone to go for a slash. Jump out on them, flash your badge, give them a fright and end up soaked in piss.
- 1265 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- News
- ridiculous
- (and 5 more)
-
Why couldn't they just piss themselves like the average person who stays/lives in a tent?
-
-
You're going to be suicidal in the summer when he 100% leaves, aren't you?
-
I think the definition of HG is simply playing for a club between ages 15-21 at the minute isn't it, so if you bring in a future star from overseas they'd count. I think I'd only ever bring it back to a national level otherwise you'd end up with a load of teams suing each other - Mackems taking a kid from south Gateshead and claiming him as Durham or some shite and that would be a fucking bureaucratic nightmare. Just say if he's a British citizen then he counts as home grown and signing him comes down to the contract offer from you and whomever else. Extend it so you're also allowed a handful of youth players from overseas who'd also qualify as HG, but you need to allocate a specific space in your academies and are only allowed a definitive amount. That way you a) don't lose out on class young players from abroad to some big club overseas with different rules and b) you encourage promoting these players / selling them for profit to free up spaces for the next batch of talented foreigners.
-
Madness that three goalies, two inexperienced teenagers, and a handful of finished squad players haven't brought us any points. Madness I say.
-
Lewis Miley - He’s one of our own (Stanley)
Dazzler replied to Anorthernsoul's topic in Newcastle Forum
According to this website he was already on £5k a week Lewis Miley Contract, Salary Cap Details & Breakdowns | Spotrac Fuck knows if this is accurate, but assuming it is I reckon he's on at least £10k per week now. -
According to one of the mackems at work it's something their DOF has been blagging since he joined. The model of buying young players at bargain prices and selling them on at a massive profit, but in his eyes just means they buy shite and get stuck with shite because so far all they have bought is shite The 'model' is just the Mike Ashley 'model' in reality, and unless you have capable people in post it's likely to lead to disaster. It works at Brighton because they have a mint scouting network that they spend fortunes on. Sunderland have a director of football who plays fifa once a week
-
It just needs to be something easy to find on the stat accounts and inarguable really, a metric that applies to a simple figure(s) on the audited accounts. A universal monetary cap could (and should) be deemed unfair. As it stands it's unfair to the smaller clubs, or those with ambition. A transfer cap would be deemed unfair by the clubs capable of comfortably spending above it (us included).
-
I've been working my way through Loudermilk on Netflix. It's cracking so far, a sitcom about a recovering alcoholic who leads a support group for a rag tag group of recovering addicts.
-
Aye but my way of say: Revenue less debt funding + player sales would mean Man Utd would have a negative transfer budget every year and they'd die, and all their fans would die, and SAF would die (he's probably teetering now anyway tbf). I much prefer my way.
-
Even if they had factored in inflation down the years it's a mental figure - £105m of losses to Man City are poles apart to £105m of losses for a team like Luton. Man City lose £105m over three seasons and it just means they didn't do a cup and league double one year, but will make it back by selling 3 academy players to Southampton when they are promoted. Luton are in administration. Even losses as a % of revenue over three years would make more sense, then it's scalable depending on the size of the club. You want to increase the threshold for losses? Make more money, boost revenues, sell players at huge profits etc.
-
Doesn't that simply maintain the status quo though? E.g. if all clubs are only allowed to spend £120m then none of the teams beneath the elite will ever catch up. We need the ability to spend within our own capacity, same as the other clubs. It would need to factor in things like revenues, profit from player sales and how much of the company is funded through debt financing (inc. instalment obligations to other clubs for transfers) IMO. That way clubs that increase revenues and sell on a few players at massive profit, whilst having a low gearing ratio can spend more than heavily debt funded clubs - That is sustainable and actually fair, it doesn't penalise clubs with ambition, and encourages clubs to invest in their academies etc.
-
I pulled out three fingernails as punishment, but fair is fair and it had to be said.
