Happy Face 29 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Reluctantly gave the mail the click (because.... what difference does it make now) and I'm struggling to find how Piers Morgan liked the child rapist loving McGregor before he refused the interview and the child rapist loving aspect only became an issue when he turned down the interview. It suggests Piers Morgan has no issue with Child rapists or the people who love them. Monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4964 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 (edited) While that article is unbelievable, I think that's his point. He's saying that McGregor has damned him (Morgan) by his associations with Trump, and that he is in turn suggesting that McGregor should apply the same logic to his own personal life. He can make this argument without being a hypocrite on the grounds that he himself hasn't suggested that damning by association is a viable position. Edited January 24, 2017 by Rayvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30718 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Christ, talk about toys out the pram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30718 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 While that article is unbelievable, I think that's his point. He's saying that McGregor has damned him (Morgan) by his associations with Trump, and that he is in turn suggesting that McGregor should apply the same logic to his own personal life. He can make this argument without being a hypocrite on the grounds that he himself hasn't suggested that damning by association is a viable position. I suppose that's the benefit of being amoral, lacking in principle and being primarliy concerning yourself with arselicking whichever set of cunts is in power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4964 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 (edited) All true, I'm just saying that we can't really call him a hypocrite on this one EDIT - while, disconcertingly, he actually can (with some justification) make that accusation about McGregor. Edited January 24, 2017 by Rayvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 3989 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Can't get twitter URL links at work - what's the child rapist bit about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4258 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Can't get twitter URL links at work - what's the child rapist bit about? Mcgregor willingly working with Polanski but not going on piers show cause he likes trump. many people responding with pictures/article extracts of piers talking in glowing terms about the likes of Savile, Harris and max whatshisface. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 3989 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 I think his main reason was Morgan's shitty women's March comments rather than his Trump worship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 27370 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 I think his main reason was Morgan's shitty women's March comments rather than his Trump worship.If his main comment on the matter, when finding out Morgan was on the show was, 'FFS, not that cunt, his patter's fucking shit', then surely that would be reason enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 While that article is unbelievable, I think that's his point. He's saying that McGregor has damned him (Morgan) by his associations with Trump, and that he is in turn suggesting that McGregor should apply the same logic to his own personal life. He can make this argument without being a hypocrite on the grounds that he himself hasn't suggested that damning by association is a viable position. Morgan's strapline should be "Piers Morgan - Unhypocritically Paedophile Loving and Proud" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26738 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Him and Trump share the same mental age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 12863 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Did Morgan release a book that bombed recently or something? Seems particularly starved for attention recently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4964 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Did Morgan release a book that bombed recently or something? Seems particularly starved for attention recently I think he's just blundered onto the wrong side of the SJWs. His comments wouldn't be attention worthy at all without the twatterati giving him oxygen. Apparently he has indeed retreated into his safe space to deal with it. The warm bosom of the Daily Heil. Made for each other, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14132 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 The distinction between "SJW" and "normal decent human being" is a blurry one sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4964 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 (edited) The distinction between "SJW" and "normal decent human being" is a blurry one sometimes. I'll concede that Piers Morgan is likely to cause the two groups to combine more often than many others. I think the line more or less follows on this premise though: normal decent human beings can be offended at things others say through no fault or will of their own, based on their own sensibilities. SJWs cultivate a victim complex that predisposes them to take offence at as much as they can because, like Morgan, they live off the attention. Edited January 24, 2017 by Rayvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30718 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30718 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14132 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Fair point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30718 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20039 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 makes my batting look good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6058 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Brett Lee wasn't even looking for the stumps the first 5 balls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20039 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 The plight of him trying to charge down the pitch to Lee's first delivery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30718 Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 That was after he'd questioned the courage of the English batsmen facing Johnson. Ended up with cracked ribs. The stupid fucking cunt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6058 Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Mitchell Johnson's stats in yesterday's BBL semi final 4 overs 3 wickets 3 runs 2 maidens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30718 Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-38748373 Sounds like a bright lad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now